Hello all,
I need information on source-based-routing, very specific not
policy routing, I need only source-based-routing information
please help me as soon as possible.
regads
Vadiraj C S
Deeprootlinux Ltd
___
Medicine meets Marketing; Dr.
Hi,
as I wrote in my last mail I had some troubles with running IMQ device, because
it caused Kernel panic.
SOLUTION: Of course it was MY mistake, because I forgot to apply IMQ NAT patch..
So if you are trying to run IMQ device on NAT box, don't forget to apply imqnat
patch (http://alfa.tailor.com
Stef Coene wrote:
>>Thank you for your advice.
>>I have checked link quality before I applied CBQ and after I applied CBQ.
>>And ... I have checked switch, cable, etc.
>>I confirmed they are 100 Mbps full duplex.
>>
>>
>It's not becaused they are configured as 100Mbps full duplex that you are
Sounds like you might have some lightly toasted hardware that's sending
bogus frames that are crashing your switch firmware.
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 06:07, David Ruggles wrote:
> Sorry for the OT post, but I'm starting to pull my hair out.
>
> We got hit with lighting about a month ago and after fi
Primary FTP site is:
ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/
Damion de Soto said:
> Daniel Horth wrote:
>> Hi - I've been going through the LARTC how-to and have successfully
used
>> the
>> sample scripts (and wondershaper) with my xDSL links.
> Are you using the cbq or htb shaping scripts ?
The cbq scripts...
>> I've been attempting to use the wondershape
Do I need any patches for setting up load balancing between 2 uplinks? I
don't need NAT, I just have a squid proxy server and on the same linux rh9
computer I have 2 uplinks (adsl+cable modem) and all I want is squid to use
load balancing on these links.
I have kernel 2.4.21 now and I have done the
Brian Capouch wrote:
I'm reading the LARTC HOWTO, and it talks about iproute2.
It doesn't talk about--at least the first one I found with
google--whether or not this program is still in development. When I go
to the .ru site that I find when looking for it the latest version I
find there is fro
I'm reading the LARTC HOWTO, and it talks about iproute2.
It doesn't talk about--at least the first one I found with
google--whether or not this program is still in development. When I go
to the .ru site that I find when looking for it the latest version I
find there is from January 2002.
Is t
No worries. Why does it work?
Every packet leaving an interface is up to MTU bytes in length. Let's
say that a byte is ten bits (8+ 1start+1stop). So a 1500byte packet is
15000 bits. On a 28.8K connection, that means a 1500 byte packet takes
0.52 seconds to transmit. Assuming that the queueing disc
Daniel Horth wrote:
Hi - I've been going through the LARTC how-to and have successfully used the
sample scripts (and wondershaper) with my xDSL links.
Are you using the cbq or htb shaping scripts ?
I've been attempting to use the wondershaper script with this PSTN
connection - but don't seem to be
Hello,
I curently have setup bandwith limiting by using cbq.init script to limit
about 100 workstations to a specific amount of bandwith, but I need to
change that to a dynamic bandwith allocation.
I'm using a rh9 router with kernel 2.4.21 and I want to setup bandwith
allocation dynamically betwe
Hello.
Catalin Petrescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So I set CBQ.init following like this.
> >
> >/etc/rc.d/CBQ.init
> >DEVICE=eth0,100Mbit,10Mbit
> >RATE=10Mbit
> >WEIGHT=1Mbit
> >PRIO=5
> >
> >When I set RATE=6Mbit,I can limit bandwidth 6Mbps.
> >But I set RATE=7Mbit,8Mbit,...
> > I can l
Sorry for the OT post, but I'm starting to pull my hair out.
We got hit with lighting about a month ago and after fixing all of the
obvious problems we are left with one nagging problem.
About every week to week and a half, our network shuts down. It's like the
switch reboots. The first time it h
>So I set CBQ.init following like this.
>
>/etc/rc.d/CBQ.init
>DEVICE=eth0,100Mbit,10Mbit
>RATE=10Mbit
>WEIGHT=1Mbit
>PRIO=5
>
>When I set RATE=6Mbit,I can limit bandwidth 6Mbps.
>But I set RATE=7Mbit,8Mbit,...
> I can limit bandwidth only 6.95Mbps everytime.
>Why?
watch your default tbf setti
On Monday 08 September 2003 21:02, Jay Wineinger wrote:
> Hey guys,
> Im going to be setting up a qos system for the college I attend and I
> had some questions. First, the box will be a transparent bridge and I
> would like to prioritize traffic (3 class/types only, [interactive,
> web+mail+e
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 08:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to make IMQ device to work... So I patched the kernel, patched
> iptables, made all the stuff, boot to new kernel was ok, module imq was
> there and it was ok to load it and 'ip link imq0 up' also worked and imq0
> was pre
> Thank you for your advice.
> I have checked link quality before I applied CBQ and after I applied CBQ.
> And ... I have checked switch, cable, etc.
> I confirmed they are 100 Mbps full duplex.
It's not becaused they are configured as 100Mbps full duplex that you are able
to get 10
>
> Message: 1
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Routing problem
> From: Ronny Aasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: lartc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Damion de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization:
> Date: 08 Sep 2003 08:41:46 +0200
>
> On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 01:03, Damion de Soto wrote:
> > gaston wrote:
> >
>So I set CBQ.init following like this.
>
>/etc/rc.d/CBQ.init
>DEVICE=eth0,100Mbit,10Mbit
>RATE=10Mbit
>WEIGHT=1Mbit
>PRIO=5
>
>When I set RATE=6Mbit,I can limit bandwidth 6Mbps.
>But I set RATE=7Mbit,8Mbit,...
> I can limit bandwidth only 6.95Mbps everytime.
>Why?
watch your default tbf setti
Hello everyone.
Rio Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2003 09:42, Mitsuru MIZUTANI wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > I am using CBQ.init to shape bandwidth but I have a problem.
> >
> > Linux PC2 (192.168.0.10)
> >
Hi - I've been going through the LARTC how-to and have successfully used the
sample scripts (and wondershaper) with my xDSL links.
I'm now faced with the challenge of providing 8 users at work an effective
remote access connection over a PSTN ppp connection. The critical traffic in
this case relat
Hi,
Not yet, but I will try soon.
Remus
> On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:09, Remus wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I would like to know if IMQ (http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/) is going to
be
> > ported to the 2.6 kernel or there is something else?
> I just took a quick look at the imq patch and
23 matches
Mail list logo
