Re: [LARTC] >10Mbit on HTB

2003-10-13 Thread Rio Martin
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 01:51, Stef Coene wrote: > On Monday 13 October 2003 16:17, Kristiadi Himawan wrote: > > Oh ok, it's working now. The script is fine. > > My test tool isn't accurate. > > Now i have test with iperf and get accurate result. > > Other question ...:) > > which ingress qdisc

Re: [LARTC] scripts posted to the list

2003-10-13 Thread drew einhorn
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lartc&w=2 On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 04:20, Steve Wright wrote: > Many scripts are posted to this list, and they are very interesting to > read. Often these scripts are very good solutions that have never been > seen before, and now that they are gone are unlikely to b

[LARTC] scripts posted to the list was: Mangaing uplinks

2003-10-13 Thread Steve Wright
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 02:04, Paras pradhan wrote: > hi all: > > my network is like this: > > Linux Router > Remote access server ( RAS) > Dialup users > (x.x.x.1) (x.x.x.11) (x.x.x.20 - x.x.x.100) > > Now i want to control bandwidth from Linux router. > What

Re: [LARTC] Linux bandwidth arbitrator

2003-10-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 13 October 2003 22:05, Robert Kurjata wrote: > Hi Stef, > > W Twoim liœcie datowanym 13 paŸdziernika 2003 (20:46:54) mo¿na przeczytaæ: > > SC> On Monday 13 October 2003 13:23, Lanre Eke wrote: > >> Hi, > >> i will like to use the linux bandwidth arbitrator so i downloaded > >> "arbitrator

Re[2]: [LARTC] Linux bandwidth arbitrator

2003-10-13 Thread Robert Kurjata
Hi Stef, W Twoim liœcie datowanym 13 paŸdziernika 2003 (20:46:54) mo¿na przeczytaæ: SC> On Monday 13 October 2003 13:23, Lanre Eke wrote: >> Hi, >> i will like to use the linux bandwidth arbitrator so i downloaded >> "arbitrator6.2.tar.gz" from their site unto my redhat 9.0 system but i dont >> k

Re: [LARTC] How to get router involved in QoS?

2003-10-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Saturday 11 October 2003 10:23, Vladimir Trebicky wrote: > Hi, > >I have a router which QoSes traffic for local network (both in and > out direction). I would also download traffic generated by router to > be involved in QoS. Link capacity is st about 800kbps and we shape it > with htb to 51

Re: [LARTC] newbie question

2003-10-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 13 October 2003 13:38, Muhammad Reza wrote: > hi All. > this my script for shapping with htb, to shapping my network subnet > > ISP--eth--eth1---lan with 4 subnet > > cat /etc/shorewall/tcstart > #!/bin/bash > /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 20 > /sbin/tc class add

Re: [LARTC] Mangaing uplinks

2003-10-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 13 October 2003 15:04, Paras pradhan wrote: > hi all: > > my network is like this: > > Linux Router > Remote access server ( RAS) > Dialup users > (x.x.x.1) (x.x.x.11) (x.x.x.20 - x.x.x.100) > > Now i want to control bandwidth from Linux router. > What

Re: [LARTC] >10Mbit on HTB

2003-10-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 13 October 2003 16:17, Kristiadi Himawan wrote: > Oh ok, it's working now. The script is fine. > My test tool isn't accurate. > Now i have test with iperf and get accurate result. > > Other question ...:) > which ingress qdisc that accurate like htb? None. Htb is an egress qdisc so it sh

Re: [LARTC] VPN-Masquerade

2003-10-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 13 October 2003 14:54, Vadiraj C S wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on VPN now, I need VPN-Masquerade patch for linux 2.4.22 > kernel. > Please give me the links that provide the above. This is a mailing list to discuss lartc : Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control (http://lartc.or

Re: [LARTC] Linux bandwidth arbitrator

2003-10-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 13 October 2003 13:23, Lanre Eke wrote: > Hi, > i will like to use the linux bandwidth arbitrator so i downloaded > "arbitrator6.2.tar.gz" from their site unto my redhat 9.0 system but i dont > know how to install it and run it. > > I will like to use it for traffic shapping and try it fo

Re: [LARTC] Redundant Internet connections [Updated]

2003-10-13 Thread Robert Kurjata
Witaj Seth, W Twoim liście datowanym 13 października 2003 (18:24:08) można przeczytać: SJB> Sorry, I really wasn't paying attention when I wrote this (i.e. I've had SJB> no sleep). SJB> I have the routing tables working properly for the internal network. SJB> What I need to do is have the routi

[LARTC] failover-overload

2003-10-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all, curious if anyone can comment on the existence (or perhaps) non existence of an overload feature -- when one line to an isp is at its peek, the second line starts getting the new sessions? also, i noticed in an earlier thread the keepalive daemon for just failover (the first line is an a

[LARTC] Redundant Internet connections [Updated]

2003-10-13 Thread Seth J. Blank
Sorry, I really wasn't paying attention when I wrote this (i.e. I've had no sleep). I have the routing tables working properly for the internal network. What I need to do is have the routing tables update the gateways when a line is down. i.e.intranet - firewall - router1 - int

[LARTC] Redundant Internet connections

2003-10-13 Thread Seth J. Blank
I have a firewall with two redundant internet connections coming in (eth0 and eth1) and an intranet behind eth2. What I am trying to do is have data off of eth2 split evenly between eth0 and eth1, and if one interface goes down, to fully utilize the other. What I'm trying to do is have all data

[LARTC] Traffic shaping over two different lines

2003-10-13 Thread Jan Gerritsen
Hi all, I want to connect my LAN to the Internet over two different Connections. One is a static E1 (2Mbit) connection with a permanent IP, the other one is a so called DSL-Light connection (ADSL with 64kbit up and 384kbit downstream) with a dynamic IP. The reason is that I have to pay the traf

Re: [LARTC] >10Mbit on HTB

2003-10-13 Thread Kristiadi Himawan
Oh ok, it's working now. The script is fine. My test tool isn't accurate. Now i have test with iperf and get accurate result. Other question ...:) which ingress qdisc that accurate like htb? Thnx - Original Message - From: "Rio Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: M

[LARTC] Mangaing uplinks

2003-10-13 Thread Paras pradhan
hi all: my network is like this: Linux Router > Remote access server ( RAS) > Dialup users (x.x.x.1) (x.x.x.11) (x.x.x.20 - x.x.x.100) Now i want to control bandwidth from Linux router. What sud be done is: x.x.x.30 ( let's assume) sud not get uplink more th

[LARTC] VPN-Masquerade

2003-10-13 Thread Vadiraj C S
Hello, I'm working on VPN now, I need VPN-Masquerade patch for linux 2.4.22 kernel. Please give me the links that provide the above. Thanks in advance -- Vadiraj C S ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/l

[LARTC] newbie question

2003-10-13 Thread Muhammad Reza
hi All. this my script for shapping with htb, to shapping my network subnet ISP--eth--eth1---lan with 4 subnet cat /etc/shorewall/tcstart #!/bin/bash /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 20 /sbin/tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2mbit ceil 2mbit /sbin/tc class

[LARTC] MSN messenger 6 keeps disconnecting after a few minutes

2003-10-13 Thread GoMi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, i actually already told you about this problem, but i cant find a way to solve it. Let me explain my self again: - -I have 2 dsl connections, so i do load balacing. - -My QoS setup is based on htb on both ethernets: iptables -t mangle

[LARTC] Linux bandwidth arbitrator

2003-10-13 Thread Lanre Eke
Hi, i will like to use the linux bandwidth arbitrator so i downloaded "arbitrator6.2.tar.gz" from their site unto my redhat 9.0 system but i dont know how to install it and run it. I will like to use it for traffic shapping and try it for on my network. Please can anyone help me at this Thanks

Re: [LARTC] kernel panic with using IMQ - why?

2003-10-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 13 October 2003 07:36, Павел Мальков wrote: > Hi, All! > I have kernel panic with using IMQ on my linux router. > In archive of this mailing list i found reason of this truble: > i used PREROUTING -j IMQ and POSTROUTING -j IMQ in one time > but i don't understand why this configuration is

Re: [LARTC] Priorizing bandwidth share

2003-10-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 13 October 2003 08:07, Nguyen Dang Phuoc Dong wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have tested Priorizing bandwidth share feature of HTB and it results very > bad. > > My test environment is something like below. There only 2 PCs on my LAN > > Internet > > ADSL > > | eth1 > > Linux box (iptables

[LARTC] Bridge with load balancing

2003-10-13 Thread GoMi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have a question here, i am wondering if changing my setup. I have a linux firewall doing QoS and load balancing with 3 ethernets. I have to DSL connections running at 2Mbit each. So, i was wondering, can i change this setup to set up to bri