Hi.
Roy wrote:
Finaly I made imq driver stable [...]
This is completely diferent code than old imq.
May I then second the proposal to give the driver another name? How
about IMQ2, IMQng (next generation) or something like that?
Bye, Mike
___
LARTC mai
Seems I was to fast to declare success,
my version is not much more stable than the original one,everything depends
on dropped packets.
This is even not imq fault afterall, can be prowed in other way also:
atempts to police outgoing trafic it will be ok until you dont touch localy
generated packe
> Finaly I made imq driver stable it did not crashed for all 5 hours under
> high load, soo looks stable.
> (old one was crashing after 1-5 min for me)
It seems to capture ingress and egress traffic of all interfaces; wouldn't
this count packets twice ?
If the machine is doing SNAT or DNAT, wha
I need them both but POM fefuses to include them in kennes saying that they
are incompatible
what is that nonsense?
anybody have them both at once?
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://la
On Jan 26, Michael S. Kazmier wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> Perhaps I missed something below which ties eth0 and eth1 to the PPP pipe,
> or its just my unfamiliarity with PPP.
>
sorry I should of made it cleaner. If you read up on Advanced Routing HOWTO,
its hopefully easy to understand.
lets say:
Hello all,
I am having some trouble getting a firewall filter to work with TC. I am
actually setting the mark via EBTables (which is working as far as I can
tell, I am also logging the packet and my syslog reports lots of marks):
ebtables -t broute -A BROUTING -p ipv4 -i eth1 -s 08:00:46:60:B3:
I set up a little test to see what the behaviour of (e)sfq was - because
I couldn't work it out from the source :-) .
I wanted to see where from a slot the packets got dropped when the queue
was full. (e)sfq drops from the longest slot to make space for an
incoming packet, so it's not tail drop
Finaly I made imq driver stable it did not crashed for all 5 hours under
high load, soo looks stable.
(old one was crashing after 1-5 min for me)
no need to patch anything just compile and insmod, should work with any
kernel probably must be > than 2.4.20
This is completely diferent code than old
Hello again,
I need to change the R2Q for my script, as setting the quantum manually for
each class is painful. Can you tell me exactly where to set R2Q = x?
I get syntax errors all the time. Should it be specified for each class? I
do not know where to place this setting...
Thanks in advance,
./configure --no-tcsim
will make your life easier if you just want tcc (compiler) not tcsim
(simulator)
Rubens
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Help! I can't get TCNG to compile!!! It did this on 2 different machines!
> Here are the errors:
>
> --
Title: I can't get TCNG to compile!!!
Help! I can't get TCNG to compile!!! It did this on 2 different machines! Here are the errors:
Kernel: 2.4.22
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tcng]# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.22-1.2149.nptl #1 Wed Jan 7 13:08
Title: Help with a simple config
Here's the scenario:
- 4 NIC's; 1 Upstream, 3 subscribers each with different rates.
NIC-1: NO CAP simply 100mbit
I want to cap the traffic on each of the subscriber NIC's to a specific rate i.e.:
- NIC-2: 8mbit
- NIC-3: 5mbit
- NIC-4: 3mbit
Jus
> the new imq driver that i am developing will have unlimited posibilities
> it willbe fake interface wich passes all ip trafic without exception no
> mater which direction, destination and so on
> even localy generated and received trafic should pass it
May I suggest that if it's new code with
Hello Alex,
Perhaps I missed something below which ties eth0 and eth1 to the PPP pipe,
or its just my unfamiliarity with PPP.
Regardless, an interesting methodology. Do you think you could do the
following:
--
The reason I ask is that I would like to, at the PPP level, apply CBQ o
PROBLEM SOLVED!
I didn't have to bind the output to the mail server.
The problem was that I didn't have a SNAT rule for eth0 (the network
interface attached to the ADSL modem).
Thank god for that!
> iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 25
> ip rule add fwmark 25 l
Roy wrote:
even if imq is quite useless right now
I thought it was OK for inbound traffic.
What sort of load/traffic do you see crashes with.
I have an old P200 as a gateway and can run bittorrents on it, with IMQ
doing outbound for locally generated traffic (not that I really need
to) and can
> iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 25
> ip rule add fwmark 25 lookup mail
> ip route add default via xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx dev ppp0 table mail
>
> Running tcpdump it appears that port 25 traffic is be routed through the
> ADSL connection. However, the source IP address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, most of the p2p programs are bandwith wasters, because they open lots
of parallel connections.
I have 5 queues to prioritize traffic, but these p2p open thousands of connections and
my systems gets REALLY HIGH latence.
Does anyb
Hi Roy,
Excelent Roy!!!
Good job.
Where we can get your IMQ port to test?
Best Regards
Remus
- Original Message -
From: "Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 3:49 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ Stability
> Internet (eth0) <-> ppp0 - ppp
I have fixed half of the problem with:
iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 25
ip rule add fwmark 25 lookup mail
ip route add default via xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx dev ppp0 table mail
Running tcpdump it appears that port 25 traffic is be routed through the
ADSL connection. Howe
20 matches
Mail list logo
