Hi,
I just upgraded to kernel 2.6.2 patched with IMQ-NAT patch ESFQ from Jim
diGriz's QoS Script and now I need to patch iproutefor esfq and the latest
HTB patch. I grabbed iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz and I applied the
folowinf patches:
iproute2-2.2.4-now-ss001007-esfq.diff and
Hi,
I have more ethernet cards. Egress shaping with HTB over eth0 works
fine, ingress shaping with HTB over IMQ works also fine, but in both of
cases I use only one class of traffic.
Now I want to divide traffic to 3 classes on other interface (egress to
ineternal network). I try this command
Hi,
The machine has two ethernet interfaces: eth0 and eth1.
My LAN is connected to eth0.
The eth1 port is connected to a hub with two Internet routers. eth1 has
two IP addresses, one for each router.
Dynamic routing (or some other complex routing mechanism) is used. NAT
is not used. It is not
Thank you very much for suggestion. I added a static route for SMTP
server, and it works OK.
But what method should I use, if I want to tie for example all the
HTTPS (TCP 443) traffic to one line. Should I mark packets in mangle
PREROUTING table or somewhere else ? Maybe you have some
hi,
thnx for replying.
i've heard of ipt_p2p, and after a quick look at it decided i'd have to take
a much longer look at it :)
to tell the truth i'm not too worried about just limiting BT
The main issue comes with the bit i don't think i made clear in the post
the reason i limit eth0 is
mark ryan wrote:
If i use the following tc command, where do i set the speed limit for
the outbound ftp traffic?
Mark
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 02:35, Corey Hickey wrote:
mark ryan wrote:
Is there a way to apply wondershaper w/ htb to a port range?
I have a ftp server on port 65432 and
On Sunday 08 February 2004 10:44, Patrick Spousta wrote:
Hi,
I have more ethernet cards. Egress shaping with HTB over eth0 works
fine, ingress shaping with HTB over IMQ works also fine, but in both of
cases I use only one class of traffic.
Now I want to divide traffic to 3 classes on other
After few hours of looking, I couldn't find a way to combine (and)
different filters.
Example: I need to police ingress traffic coming from certain source IPs
(which are best expressed with u32 filter) and going to certain routes
(which are best expressed with route filter).
What I was trying
This is still not working correctly. Wondershaper + htb by itself
limits everything to the speed specified in the config.
I only want to limit my ftp upload speed.
I tried the suggestion below, but either I am not doing it right or it
doesnt work correctly.
I only want to limit ports
mark ryan wrote:
Or, ideally, I would like to limit proftpd itself...howeve there
doesn't seem to be a way to do that with linux. Windows can but I
guess Linux cant.
Proftpd does have plenty of ways to limit the bandwidth specifically
for certain commands only and directions wished and all
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how the wondershaper ACK match works. Can
somebody help me decode it?
|tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
| match ip protocol 6 0xff \
TCP.
Do these start from the start of the IP header, or the TCP header?
| match u8 0x05 0x0f at 0 \
Alan Ford wrote:
I'm trying to understand how the wondershaper ACK match works. Can
somebody help me decode it?
|tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
| match ip protocol 6 0xff \
TCP.
Aye.
Do these start from the start of the IP header, or the TCP header?
Ip
if you need only hardlimit ftp trafic then better find something about this
in proftp manual
But if you want it to depend on other trafic(if you have other servers) then
you will need to use htb anyway,
tc filters are very primitive and cant match port range well, but you can
adjust ftp port
13 matches
Mail list logo
