[LARTC] upgrading iproute2

2004-06-13 Thread Leandro PatrĂ³n
Hi. I have Fedora core 1 (kernel 2.4.22) and I downloaded http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.7-ss040608.tar.gz Before upgrading, tc -V shows iproute2-ss020116, and after shows the same. I had a lot of errors during install (make and make install). Is this lastest

[LARTC] collisions on my eth0

2004-06-13 Thread Yemi Fowe
Hello all, i have been having problem with my LAN. The browsing speed went rapidly slow, expecialy yahoo.com(its not even opening). I new the problem wasnt from my ISP, because all other Networks are browsing fast! I did ifconfig on my Linux server, and discovered there were some collisions on

[LARTC] [Help] IMQ download traffic is duplicated !?

2004-06-13 Thread Yacine
Hi, I have a default class for my un-marked traffic (prio 5) and a prio 0 class for the important stuff, but I do not understand why my download traffic isduplicated inboth. It work fine for my upload traffic (same setting except the red class but I have the same result if I create an

[LARTC] Consider r2q change, why !?

2004-06-13 Thread Yacine
Hi,My system always complain with the warning below :HTB: quantum of class 10099 is small. Consider r2q change.I simply do not understand why...Below my tc commands :/sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth0 root/sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 99/sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent

Re: [LARTC] HTB theory?

2004-06-13 Thread Andy Furniss
Dmitry Golubev wrote: snip One think I do not understand neither for SFQ nor for HTB (please explain for both) - how can we maintain fairness in case of differently-sizes packets. As I understand, one packet is atomic unit, and interface is requesting not more and not less than one packet. I

Re: [LARTC] Consider r2q change, why !?

2004-06-13 Thread Clifford Payne
A little bit of searching brings up this page: http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/31.html I hope that helps, Cliff Yacine wrote: Hi, My system always complain with the warning below : HTB: quantum of class 10099 is small. Consider r2q change. ... Thanks, Yacine.

[LARTC] DSCP marking at core

2004-06-13 Thread Gunes Agar
Hi, I want to setup core routers to do both DSCP marking and to get the DSCP and forward packets based on DS field. I don't want to separate DSCP marking to be done only at the edge routers. I know that dsmark is both used for DSCP marking and for getting the DSCP and forwarding packets

Re: [LARTC] HTB theory?

2004-06-13 Thread Martin Devera
1. In order of priority, we satisfy all leaf classes' rates (while the class is ?green?) 2. When the leaf classes' rate is reached (all the leaf classes are ?yellow?), borrow the unused speed from parent classes if they have something to give (if they are not ?red?). In this case, each leaf

Re: [LARTC] borrowing

2004-06-13 Thread Stef Coene
On Saturday 12 June 2004 18:47, victor wrote: I have - HZ - recompiled to 1000 - class nr 1 - 2kbit ceil 1024kbit - class nr 2 - 16kbit ceil1024kbit - prio 3 to all classes But class 1 works with 20kbit/sec and class 2 with 60kbit/sec. The proportion does not seems right. This is still