[LARTC] Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler

2004-07-07 Thread Catalin BOIE
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, jamal wrote: On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 22:49, David S. Miller wrote: I'm going to hold off on Stephen's patches until Jamal and he has a chance to fight it out :-) Actually i would be fine with it if Stephen gets rid of the new rate thing. I expect that duplicates of packet will

[LARTC] Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler

2004-07-07 Thread Catalin BOIE
On Wed, 6 Jul 2004, jamal wrote: On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 12:09, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Your examples made me think about this more. The netfilter seem best suited to things that effect the flow of packets (dropping, reordering, even corrupting), and the qdisc seems best when the timing needs to

[LARTC] ala gateway problems

2004-07-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi, I have very annoying problem.. First a simple diagram : x.x.1.0/24 -| x.x.2.0/24 -| (gw: eth0: x.x.1.1 eth1: x.x.2.1 eth1: x.x.3.1) x.x.3.0/24 -| now I have two machines x.x.3.10 (2.4 kernel) and x.x.3.11(2.6 kernel) AND they are

[LARTC] connmark+connbytes

2004-07-07 Thread Tomasz Chilinski
Hello! Maybe someone needs connmark and connbytes working together? See attached file compatible with pom-ng-20040621 (I called it connmarkbytes :)). Kind Regards, Tomasz Chilinski pom-ng-connmarkbytes.tar.bz2 Description: application/tbz

[LARTC] HTB Packet Scheduling for Linux 2.4.14 kernel

2004-07-07 Thread Reema.Bangar
Hi All, Can I backport 2.4.20 kernel version's HTB related changes to 2.4.14 ? Will this work w/o any issues ? Please consider this urgent and replay asap. Thanks in advance, Reema. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[LARTC] ESFQ patch problem

2004-07-07 Thread Anil Kumar
I applied esfq patch to kernel then I have applied iproute2-2.2.4-now-ss001007-esfq.diff to patch iproute2 (tc utility, iproute2-ss010824) source: http://www.ssi.bg/~alex/esfq/ But whenever I try to add esfq qdisc with parameter it says it donot know the qdisc i.e esfq. tc qdisc add

[LARTC] Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler

2004-07-07 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Ok, I'll bite how would you do: Rate limit packet egress on a ethernet device (eth0) so it looks like a slow DSL link (25 Kbps) by not dropping packets but by pacing the data. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[LARTC] Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler

2004-07-07 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On 07 Jul 2004 14:57:48 -0400 jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I seem to have hit the jackpot - all my emails to netdev are showing up and on time too. On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 14:10, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Ok, I'll bite how would you do: Rate limit packet egress on a ethernet device

[LARTC] Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler

2004-07-07 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On 07 Jul 2004 17:11:39 -0400 jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 16:58, Stephen Hemminger wrote: TBF works but since the sender (on the same local machine) may go over it's allocation, it will drop packets. As should any queue that gets congested. For example, if I

[LARTC] tutorial for Julian Anastasov's patches

2004-07-07 Thread Glen Mabey
I'm sure that I had found (and printed out ...) a really good tutorial that explain how to use Julian Anastasov's routing patch, but I can't seem to find it now. Any pointers? -- ** Glen W. Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED]