Hi,
One of my customer needs per flow rate control, so I write one.
The code I post here is not finished, but it seems to work as expected.
The kernel patch is agains kernel 2.6.11, the iproute2 patch is against
iproute2-2.6.11-050314.
I write the code in a hurry to meet deadline. There are
Wang Jian wrote:
Hi,
One of my customer needs per flow rate control, so I write one.
The code I post here is not finished, but it seems to work as expected.
The kernel patch is agains kernel 2.6.11, the iproute2 patch is against
iproute2-2.6.11-050314.
I write the code in a hurry to meet
Hi Patrick McHardy,
HTB + SQF can only achieve part of funcionality.
Per flow rate control means per flow bandwidth assurance + bandwidth
constraint.
When we use HTB + SQF,
1. We can't achieve bandwidth assurance when flow count is higher than expected;
this often means we fail to meet the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Everyone
I'm new to tc. I'm trying to speed limit access to SSH/SFTP on my
external interface (eth0) without affecting any other traffic on any of
the other interfaces.
I've attached a script with my tc commands in. Can someone point me in
the
Hello list members,
Finaly I'm here after a week of trying to subscribe to this list... pfew...
Anyway... I have a rather strange problem with tc. I am trying to police the ingress traffic into my network using the iptables MARK feature (in mangle table, PREROUTING) but it seems that tc filters
On Sunday 27 March 2005 14:50, you wrote:
Lorin wrote:
I have some problem with traffic shaping on debian testing. I actually
posted a full config on the list a while ago but didn't get any answers.
The problem is that traffic doesn't get into the user classes (~150) when
I associate a
Wang Jian wrote:
Hi,
One of my customer needs per flow rate control, so I write one.
The code I post here is not finished, but it seems to work as expected.
The kernel patch is agains kernel 2.6.11, the iproute2 patch is against
iproute2-2.6.11-050314.
I write the code in a hurry to meet
Tim Churchard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Everyone
I'm new to tc. I'm trying to speed limit access to SSH/SFTP on my
external interface (eth0) without affecting any other traffic on any of
the other interfaces.
I've attached a script with my tc commands in. Can
Marcus Fritzsch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everybody!
I am wondering, whether it is possible to have qdiscs and classes as
childs of a class or not.
take the following example:
~ ,-
~ |class 1:1
~ | / \
~ | /
Adrian Turcu wrote:
Hello list members,
Finaly I'm here after a week of trying to subscribe to this list... pfew...
Anyway... I have a rather strange problem with tc. I am trying to police the
ingress traffic into my network using the iptables MARK feature (in mangle
table, PREROUTING) but it
There is alot of work going on with tc at the moment - There are/will be
lots more matches and the ability to run iptables commands from filters.
... Like matching the tc flows with iptables chains? that will be nice. I've
seen some similar options in the kernel, but not sure how they work
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:05:04 -0800 (PST)
js si [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i tried the example given on the examples page to
duplicate selected traffic like
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle 3: netem
duplicate 40%
tc filter add dev eth0
Le dimanche 03 avril 2005 21:55 +0300, Pan'ko Alexzender a crit :
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:54:15 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On this Fedora Core Devel (Raw Hide) system, if I boot on a distribution
kernel (based on 2.6.12rc1-bk2) the network is fine. If I build a
--
Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our system.
The following message will not be delivered:
From: [EMAIL
Hola,
I have a question in regards to ignoring traffic shaping for LAN side
that connects to a DMZ IMAP server through the WAN interface.
The DMZ and the WAN side are both on a 10/100 switch.
Is it possible?
Thanks.
~Andrew.
OS MDK 9.1 kernel-smp-2.4.21.0.33mdk-1-1mdk HTB; iproute2-2.4.7-7mdk;
I'm going to start a load balancing failover VPN over multiple
providers. It means we can not just have high availability tunnel but
also utilize the bandwidth of all providers. It'll be a part of newly
started linux
multihoming project
Is there any developer interested to join ?
Simon
hi,
I have a lan with internet conection, the gateway is a server linux. I
have a client (192.168.0.33) that i want limit his upload rate to
64kbit/s so I do:
tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: htb r2q 1
tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 64kbit
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:00:36 -0700
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:05:04 -0800 (PST)
js si [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i tried the example given on the examples page to
duplicate selected traffic like
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio
in the tc directory tc_util.h and tc_core.h use
pkt_sched.h which is stored in iproute's include
directory. is there any dependency between this
pkt_sched.h file and the ones that come with the
standard linux kernel source.
thanks.
__
Do you
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:31:52PM +0100, Andy Furniss wrote:
Adrian Turcu wrote:
Hello list members,
There is alot of work going on with tc at the moment - There are/will be
lots more matches and the ability to run iptables commands from filters.
Is there any doco on this functionality ?
--
Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our system.
The following message will not be delivered:
From: [EMAIL
21 matches
Mail list logo
