[LARTC] SQLiaison E-Mail Virus Alert

2005-05-03 Thread techsupport
SQLiaison Mail Server: GroupShield Alert The email server has discovered a problem with the following email. Please note that the sender of the email will not be notified with this message. More information : Date/Time sent: 03 May 2005 03:46:06 Subject line: [LARTC] Re: From: [EMAIL

Re: [LARTC] using tc as a function call

2005-05-03 Thread nuclearcat
Dear, js. You wrote Tuesday, May 03, 2005, 5:37:42 AM: By the way, try tc -b :) (batch mode) i wrote a C++ program that executes tc using the std::system call. this fairly reduces the performance if many tc calls are required. i want to be able to rename tc's main function to tc_main and

[LARTC] problem with filters - packets 'slipping' through them when they shouldn't

2005-05-03 Thread Marcin Kałuża
Hi! I'm trying to shape my internet connection traffic using hsfc and I've encountered the following problem (may not be connected with hfsc). on my lan interface I shape incoming traffic like this: tc qdisc add root dev eth1 handle 1: hfsc default 1003 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid

Re: [LARTC] problem with filters - packets 'slipping' through them when they shouldn't

2005-05-03 Thread Andy Furniss
Marcin Kaua wrote: Hi! I'm trying to shape my internet connection traffic using hsfc and I've encountered the following problem (may not be connected with hfsc). on my lan interface I shape incoming traffic like this: tc qdisc add root dev eth1 handle 1: hfsc default 1003 tc class add dev eth1

[LARTC] which RSVP implementation do you guys use?

2005-05-03 Thread Kelvin Chu
Hi guys, I was looking on the net for a version of RSVP to play with, and I seem to have come across 2 dominant ones: 1. ISI one, last release year 1999? 2. KOM one, last relase year 2004 So, what's your favourite RSVP implementation? What do people on the list usually use? Thanks, Kelv

Re: AW: [LARTC] urgent question about tcng!

2005-05-03 Thread Andy Furniss
Thomas Mandl wrote: Hello Everybody, I forgot to mention, that my HTTP traffic will not be handled by an apache web server, and the HTTP protocol can be replaced in the near future by a different protocol. Thus apache's mod_bandwith isn't an option for me right now. I'm not sure how Wang Jian's

Re: AW: [LARTC] urgent question about tcng!

2005-05-03 Thread Andy Furniss
Andy Furniss wrote: I don't know tcng, but the reason I suggested perflow is that you want each flow to have a ceil - unless you make a class and rule to match each flow I can't see how you can do this. Also iptables could limit the number of connections - tc can't, perflow can. Forgot to say

[LARTC] Re: [Netem] using tc as a function call

2005-05-03 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 2 May 2005 19:37:42 -0700 (PDT) js si [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i wrote a C++ program that executes tc using the std::system call. this fairly reduces the performance if many tc calls are required. i want to be able to rename tc's main function to tc_main and pass argv and argc. has

Re: [LARTC] LOADBALANCING+BRIDGING---is it possible on the same machine??

2005-05-03 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:16:55 +0100 (BST) KartheeK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, I have a linux box running with three NIC's, I have used brctl tool to configure this box as a bridge, i have given it ONE logical ipaddres, Every thing is working fine, but now i am required to

Re: [LARTC] How to read the TCP congestion window (cwnd) on Linux?

2005-05-03 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 02 May 2005 19:22:17 +0200 Antonio Pinizzotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody. Do you know about any way to read the TCP cwnd value (congestion window) on Linux? I have read that on Linux it is not possible to enable a socket option (to read to cwnd using the program

[LARTC] Unshapeable traffic

2005-05-03 Thread Tomasz Wrona
Hello, Could somebody explain following issue ? I set up htb class on outgoing external interface to shape p2p upload traffic. I limited it to 4Mbit/s. I also set up iptables counters chains in FORWARD chain to calculate traffic generated by p2p and others. While tc stats show that p2p shaping

Re: [LARTC] Unshapeable traffic

2005-05-03 Thread Andreas Klauer
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 23:34, Tomasz Wrona wrote: OK, but why traffic doesn't slow down due to shaping and still assail upload ? [I tried sqf and red qdisc attached to class]. You already found out that iptables counts packets which get dropped later by HTB. You kind of answered your own

AW: AW: [LARTC] urgent question about tcng!

2005-05-03 Thread Thomas Mandl
Sorry for the stupid question, but how would I rate limit connections using iptables? regards Thomas -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andy Furniss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. Mai 2005 16:43 An: Andy Furniss Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'LARTC' Betreff: Re: AW: [LARTC]