Title: Message
Hi,
Sorry to bother you
all. I have a typical problem sharing DSL upstream bandwidth with users. I have
3 types of traffic high-priority, medium-priority and low priority. My upstream
rate is 960kbits. Traffic (any priority) can vary in bandwidth from 0 to
960kbits. I have a t
Christian Schmid wrote:
nexthop via 80.237.244.1 dev eth1 weight 100
nexthop via 80.237.244.33 dev eth1 weight 100
I have read postings on the net but all of them are using huge scripts
because they are on different networks. My problem seems to be a much
easier problem but I ju
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:06:12PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 20:11 +0200, Markus Schulz wrote:
> > Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:05 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
> > > Hi guys;
> > >
> > [...]
> > > Here's what I want to know:
> > > 1. Does an updated guide exist for multiple p
Jason Bath wrote:
Thanks! Adding the filter to the root was the trick. From the various
documentation I was reading I had the impression that the filter needed
to be added to the sub-classes - 1:1 and so forth. I presume that's
only appropriate when you have leaves below 1:1.
Anyhow, the tri
Marcus Felipe Pereira wrote:
Hi,
I've migrated my tc configuration from CBQ to HTB.
One problem appeared. Htb seems to miscalculate the bandwidth for
classes with greater rates.
For rates below 2Mbit there is almost no difference between the
configured and the measured rate.
For large ones t
I am looking for a simple way to guarantee to each flow
going through my traffic control point 1/numflows of
bandwidth. I thought using SFQ would do this effectively
but it appears to be quite unfair: a very high speed
download that fills the pipe easily starves smaller flows to
the point where it
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 20:11 +0200, Markus Schulz wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:05 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
> > Hi guys;
> >
> [...]
> > Here's what I want to know:
> > 1. Does an updated guide exist for multiple providers?
>
> Look at this howto: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt
Indeed, and h
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:05 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
> Hi guys;
>
[...]
> Here's what I want to know:
> 1. Does an updated guide exist for multiple providers?
Look at this howto: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt
i've build based onto this howto a load balanced linux (kernel 2.6.11.8)
system with
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 16:05 +0200, Rafael A Barrero wrote:
> Hi guys;
>
> I'm sure you are all bored of hearing the same story over and over...
> but here it comes again. :) Yep, tomorrow I'm getting another ADSL
> line installed and I wanted my linux router to handle both providers
> (new a
netfilter.org is a alias for iptables.org :-)
I haven't tested it becouse I was using an other way which I forgot to mention.
You can MARK packets using iptables as comming from an interface and later route by this MARK using normal routing technics.
Its all described in lartc.org and took me hal
On Lun 9 mai 2005 17:14, Rafael A Barrero a écrit :
> Hey;
>
> I guess I should have included that aspect : what I want to achieve.
>
> I'd ideally like to use the new (faster line) as the default line for
> traffic, but be able to use the old line just as often depending on
> usage of the new line
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 17:14 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
> Hey;
>
> I guess I should have included that aspect : what I want to achieve.
>
> I'd ideally like to use the new (faster line) as the default line for
> traffic, but be able to use the old line just as often depending on
> usage of the new l
Hey;
I guess I should have included that aspect : what I want to achieve.
I'd ideally like to use the new (faster line) as the default line for
traffic, but be able to use the old line just as often depending on
usage of the new line. However, it wouldn't matter if traffic routed
randomly eit
Is it possible (one way or another) to guarantee or to limit bandwidth
of 1 session?
E.g.:
RDP: 750kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil
default: 250kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil
max bw per RDP connection: 100kbit
guaranteed bw per RDP session: 20kbit
R.
--
On Lun 9 mai 2005 16:05, Rafael A Barrero a écrit :
> Hi guys;
>
> I'm sure you are all bored of hearing the same story over and over...
> but here it comes again. :) Yep, tomorrow I'm getting another ADSL
> line installed and I wanted my linux router to handle both providers
> (new and old). I hav
Hi guys;
I'm sure you are all bored of hearing the same story over and over...
but here it comes again. :) Yep, tomorrow I'm getting another ADSL
line installed and I wanted my linux router to handle both providers
(new and old). I have my linux router (fedora core 2) setup to do NAT
for my
On Monday 09 May 2005 10:29, Anthony Letchet wrote:
> Im still reading the howtos on how to write my own rules but since the
> wondershaper script is doing exactly what i want i had hoped that
> someone would know the commands to implement this now :)
I did such a modification to wondershaper once
Well as near as I can tell you have at least a few options.
1) You could take a look at the shaping how to that I think is somewhere
linked off the gentoo.org documentation. That way you could
create/modify a script that would handle it.
2) Change your topology so all your equipment is connected
Hi all, ive got wondershaper working well with the highest download
while maintaing minimal latency but the problem is this:
ive got 2 nics in the linux router eth0 and eth1. eth1= internet
interface but this is connected to a router say 10.0.0.190, now off that
router there are other servers, mai
19 matches
Mail list logo
