[LARTC] Multiple Internet links - routing traffic to the correct one.

Hi all, I have the following configuration: ___ ++/ diginet link || | +-+

[LARTC] Qdisc stops responding

Hello lartc I wrote a scheduling qdisc that works on a per-flow basis. It dequeue packets according to a flow interval. But as it turns out there is a problem with it. The qdisc loads just fine and is working correctly. The problem is that if the qdisc is removed and loaded again, it stops

[LARTC] Qdisc stops responding

Naturally I forgot to attach the code, as I was rushing to get to lunch. R.harper p.s why do my messages end up as a reply to someone else's message in the archive? _ Log på MSN Messenger direkte fra nettet

[LARTC] I'm leaving this list ....

Hi, I'm subscribed to this mailing list for a long time. During that time, I enjoyed reading all posts and try to understand them :) LARTC started as a something I could use to impress my boss. After a while it became clear to me that my boss was not impressed ;(, but I kept following this

Re: [LARTC] Starting from scratch w/ multiple uplinks

Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 14:56 schrieb Markus Schulz: Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 09:33 schrieb Rafael A Barrero: Thanks for the link! At the beginning of the document it states that it will not work with two modem connections. What if both my ADSL lines are pppoe? Will this still work?

Re: [LARTC] I'm leaving this list ....

Stef Coene wrote: Hi, I'm subscribed to this mailing list for a long time. During that time, I enjoyed reading all posts and try to understand them :) LARTC started as a something I could use to impress my boss. After a while it became clear to me that my boss was not impressed ;(, but I

Re: [LARTC] Packets going to default class iam having still the problem

hareram wrote: Hi all Its been long time i have sending this message to this news group but i could not get proper responce from the authors or any experts that, is that bug or only the problem with my ssytem iam tryin this config with FC iptable 1.3.0 and latest TC tc utility, iproute2-ss050330

Re: [LARTC] Help with PRIO qdisc and filters

Pavan Kumar wrote: Hi, Sorry to bother you all. I have a typical problem sharing DSL upstream bandwidth with users. I have 3 types of traffic high-priority, medium-priority and low priority. My upstream rate is 960kbits. Traffic (any priority) can vary in bandwidth from 0 to 960kbits. I have a

Re: [LARTC] Waiting queue size

PRETI wrote: Hi everybody, My config is two RED waiting queues and I would like to know if it is possible to have the size of the waiting queue in real time with the tc command or whatever. tc -s qdisc ls dev eth0 or whatever dev you shape on will give a packet count as backlog. Andy.

Re: [LARTC] individual connections

richard lucassen wrote: Is it possible (one way or another) to guarantee or to limit bandwidth of 1 session? E.g.: RDP: 750kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil default: 250kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil max bw per RDP connection: 100kbit guaranteed bw per RDP session: 20kbit R. If you can't make a rule to match each

Re: [LARTC] Incorrect params

S.Mehdi Sheikhalishahi wrote: Does tc understand irregular configurations? For example in a configuration that parent class has ceil and rate parameters less than child classes? How can I limit output traffic of an interface? I test it by limiting parent class traffic but it does not work. I

Re: [LARTC] vlan traffic shaping.

Robert Denier wrote: I couldn't find anyone who had actually made it work via google so I guess I'll ask here. My setup is a VPN point to point link. The VPN is a modified version of Openvpn where I'm using zlib compression to improve the compression a bit. The goal is to shape traffic coming

Re: [LARTC] tc/htb QoS script

Ulrich Pöschl wrote: hello folks, this is my first post to that list. so I hope I am not completely OT here :-) reading the (excellent!) lartc and then writing my own qos-script I have still some open questions which I will try to formulate now: - Now we can optionally attach queuing

Re: [LARTC] Broken filters?

Pan'ko Alexzender wrote: Hi! By iptables I set marking (-j MARK) just before -j IMQ. There are only three marks. Exectly all of them are ditected to 1:20 What are the rules. Why I see 3 pkts in default 1:30? How explain it? Maybe there was traffic flowing when you ran the script. Andy. ###

Re: [LARTC] how to guarantee 1/numflows bandwidth to each flow dynamically

Scott Mcdermott wrote: I am looking for a simple way to guarantee to each flow going through my traffic control point 1/numflows of bandwidth. I thought using SFQ would do this effectively but it appears to be quite unfair: a very high speed download that fills the pipe easily starves smaller

[LARTC] Setting up split access

Hi, I have a question concerning the configuration of multiple uplinks as described in the lartc howto, chapter 4.2: I have a scenario as described in the lartc in Chapter 4.2 (Routing for multiple uplinks/providers), i.e. one linux router with two uplinks: * 2 Mbps low delay DSL connection on

Re: [LARTC] Broken filters?

On Wed, 11 May 2005 23:39:35 +0100 Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pan'ko Alexzender wrote: Hi! By iptables I set marking (-j MARK) just before -j IMQ. There are only three marks. Exectly all of them are ditected to 1:20 What are the rules. There was three tables. At the end of

[LARTC] wanted A tool to measure bandwidth....

Hello Everybody, I have configured a Linux box that does traffic shaping. Its working wonderfully fine, just as expected...Now i want to measure the bandwidth consumed by each of my hostsBut I dont want SNMP to run on all the hosts[as required by MRTG] I used iptraf on my linux box, but it

Re: [LARTC] wanted A tool to measure bandwidth....

U can configure MRTG to measure traffic counted by iptables FORWARD chain. This way u will measure how much each host is taking without installing snmp. On 5/12/05, KartheeK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Everybody, I have configured a Linux box that does traffic shaping. Its working wonderfully

Re: [LARTC] Packets going to default class iam having still the problem

Hi i have looked at this Classify its say This target is only valid in the POST_ROUTING chain of the mangle table. Usage: iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING .. -j CLASSIFY --set-class MAJOR:MINOR how about forward ?? hare - Original Message - From: Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]