Greetings all,
While I haven't given up on getting a dead gateway detection script a la
nano.txt to work on my T1/DSL router box, I have taken a break and played with
the mpath2.sh script that Robert Kurjata wrote back in 2001.
This shows more promise in that I can actually get it
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:50:03 -
Mark Lidstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've done a search through the archives but I can't find a
cause/solution to this.
I'm running a FC4 box with the stock 2.6.12 kernel and a FC2 box with a
stock 2.6.9 kernel. I'm obviously using
iproute2
Even more interesting details;
This seems to only happen when the packets are fragmented.
On 11/15/05, Ryan Castellucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit more detail.
I have the following htb classes set up...
class htb 1:356 parent 1:4 leaf 356: prio 4 quantum 1600 rate 12800bit
ceil
Hi Everyone,
Recently i am researching in the load balancing of multipath.someone tell me that if let the function of load balance basing per packet come true ,it must make use of the equalize'patch,so i downloadit and apply it to the kernel 2.4.20, it works well. the other day because of
Upon futher examination, traffic seems to flow at about 4x whatever
the ceil is set to.
On 11/14/05, Ryan Castellucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's going on here? I'm spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this?
class htb 1:613 parent 1:5
Mark Lidstone wrote:
Hi Andy,
The situation is this: there are a total of four companies represented
in our building. We've all been looking at upgrading our Internet
connections from ADSL, and as we're all owned by the same parent company
it made sense to buy our bandwidth in bulk. As such
sophana wrote:
Hi
I'm using wondershaper like script. But noticed imperfect scheduling.
By googling, I found some patches that takes the aal5 atm overhead in
the scheduling algorithms.
http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ADSL-optimizer/
Before trying it, has anyone tried these patches? they apply
Corey Hickey wrote:
In a recent thread on this list, Robert Kurjata provided me a patch to add
hashing by iptables mark to the Linux 2.4 version of ESFQ. Thanks to that
contribution, I was able to easily add support to the 2.6 port I maintain.
I found out, however, that the existing hash
Hi, I have 2 routers that are connected using 2 gre
tunnels over ipsec, and ospf. Ospf sets up the equal cost
route, but uses the 'equalize' in the route. Is
there a way to remove/disable packet based load balancing? I would
just like to do a flow based load
balance?
thx
On 11/16/05, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
What's going on here? I'm spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this?
class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit
ceil 103360bit burst
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
On 11/16/05, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
What's going on here? I'm spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this?
class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit
On 11/16/05, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
On 11/16/05, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
What's going on here? I'm spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this?
class htb 1:613
Patrick McHardy
* Fix ip command shortcuts
Hmm.. what's this change?
I've noticed that ip address no longer works, only ip addr works.
--
damjan | дамјан
This is my jabber ID -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- not my mail address!!!
___
LARTC mailing
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
On 11/16/05, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
On 11/16/05, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
What's going on here? I'm spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to
Hi, I have set up multipath routing using two gre tunnels.
The multipath routes are setup via (zebra/ospf).
I managed to modify zebra not to include the
'equalize' in the multpath route, and set theweights 1:2.
My question is that after doing 4+ ftp transfers I still do not see much traffic on
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:20:52PM +0100, Andreas Unterkircher wrote:
You could try to match on helper within iptables. Should be something like
iptables -A FORWARD --match conntrack --ctproto tcp --ctstate
RELATED,ESTABLISHED --match helper --helper ftp -j CLASSIFY
Perhaps this will
Hello!
I have a great problem!
I use the table mangle to classify the packages among two link, and also use
the mangle
to do band control, download and upload, they put the packages
marked in PREROUTING with I number him/it of the link it is also marked in
FORWARD (for band control) and the
Quoting Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jonathan Lynch wrote:
This was down to the tx buffer size on the network card i was using. It
was an Intel 82547EI gigabit Card using the e1000 driver and operating
at 100mbit. The tx buffer was set to 256 which caused this huge delay.
The minimum
A bit more detail.
I have the following htb classes set up...
class htb 1:356 parent 1:4 leaf 356: prio 4 quantum 1600 rate 12800bit
ceil 51680bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1663b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b level 0
class htb 1:357 parent 1:4 leaf 357: prio 4 quantum 1600 rate 12800bit
ceil
Hi Andy,
The situation is this: there are a total of four companies represented
in our building. We've all been looking at upgrading our Internet
connections from ADSL, and as we're all owned by the same parent company
it made sense to buy our bandwidth in bulk. As such we're hoping to
get a
I have the following scheme:
--
| router| eth0 -- eth0 | router|
| linux 1 | | linux 2 |
| | eth1 -- eth1 | |
-
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
What's going on here? I'm spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this?
class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit
ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b
Hi Stephen,
Many thanks for that information. I thought my iproute2 was up to date,
but I must have made a mistake somewhere. I'll go and grab it again.
I can see your point about prio or (p/b)fifo not being much slower, but
this will be running on an oldish Celeron box so I wanted to make
Lee Sanders wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a simple question but I don't understand why the below tbf is not
working as expected by throttling traffic to 5kbps
If I throttle a PC's traffic using the below when traffic exceeds 5kbps
packets start getting dropped (as they should) but all traffic
Hello,
I am writing a routing daemon that is able to assign different gateways to
a destination address for different classes of service. Multiple DiffServ
Code Point values are mapped into a single class of service. I have
accomplished this by using the iptables MARK target to label each
What's going on here? I'm spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil, (i watched it for a few minutes, it didn't slow
down). Anyone know how to fix this?
class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit
ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b
Hi,
I've a vsat internet link and I want
to know if I can make VOIP calls under it.
( Ping in the best case reach 900/ 100 ms
by sattelite effect )
Can with SIP protocol make voip calls ?
Thanks
andres
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
Hi,
I'm having an issue with changing the source address of packets
origininating from a specific user using a combination of iptables and
iproute2. We want to change packets originating from a specific
service so that they originate from that service's IP address, so that
we can move it to
Hey, everyone, I am kindda newbie to this subject, so I just post my problem directly, please let me know if anything is wrong.in my config file when I use tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:11 classid 1:11016 htb rate 512kbit burst 10keverything works correctlybut...when classid goes
From an Avaya switch documentation:
80 millisecond (ms) to 180 ms delay can give quality business
communication, which is much better than cell-phone quality. This range is
very well suited for the majority of businesses.
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) recommends 150
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:22:17 -0800 (PST)
weihua zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, everyone, I am kindda newbie to this subject, so I just post my problem
directly, please let me know if anything is wrong.
in my config file
when I use
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:11 classid
Hello all,
I have browsed archives and real all
available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts.
My set up is a router, as below.
LAN(100MB)-(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---WAN(2MB/512)
My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink
bandwidth.
For uplink control, I will
Chris Kloosterman wrote:
- We have two IP addresses assigned to this machine using aliases:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ip addr show
2: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
...
inet xxx.yyy.zzz.39/24 brd xxx.yyy.zzz.255 scope global eth0
inet xxx.yyy.zzz.16/24 brd
Damjan wrote:
Patrick McHardy
* Fix ip command shortcuts
Hmm.. what's this change?
I've noticed that ip address no longer works, only ip addr works.
This seems to be one of the things the introduction of
batch mode broke. This patch fixes it.
Index: ip/ip.c
34 matches
Mail list logo
