Re: [LARTC] linux bridging vlans?

Andraz Sraka wrote: but still no data is forwarded from one interface to another? Is there any sysctl stuff, that I need to set up like 'ip_forwarding' when doing routing? Is there something bridging parameter for forwarding or am I misconfigured things above? I think that the bridge device

[LARTC] packet marking: only a ratio, not all

Hi all! In short: Anybody wrote a patch for DSMARK to make it capable of marking only a ratio (a given arg to the tc command) of the packets it gets? Say, 20%? Or, do I have to hack into the source? Alternatives, like a filter spitting packets to 2 different DSMARK based on this ratio? In

[LARTC] rule fwmark desn't work for local packets (output chain)

Witam wszystkich After few days with yours help I've succeeded with setup of load-balancing. Now I have problem with next step. I want to mark some packets and than put them to the one of the routing tables to force them going via only one interface with only one ip. Easy?? Ofcourse, but not

[LARTC] ULOGD and Snort Inline

Hi All, I am facing a problem when using ULOG daemon and SNORT (inline mode) with iptables. My set up is like this. 1. I need ULOG daemon to log firewall logs to MYSQL database. 2. I need SNORT in inline mode for intrusion prevention. Both can work fine induvidually with iptables. But

Re: [LARTC] tcsim

hi! I can't answer to your question but I have another question on it. Why do you write I know that tcng is old ? I'm studying tcng, I'm loosing my time? Is there a better tool? Thanks, Fabio On Friday 31 March 2006 01:11, Larry Brigman wrote: I know that tcng is old but I have a question