It works fine on my system. Maybe try deleting qdiscs first.
On 12/04/06, pfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
Anyone got the same problem?
If I:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 4
set_tc_index
it works fine.
If I:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark
Nothing wrong with the official, my backbone is expanding quite alot
and we adding quite alot of businesses with cables in building, and we
use pppoe and radus to asign ip addresses, just looking for a block of
addresses that most companies will never use.
SewOn 4/12/06, Erik Slagter [EMAIL
Corey Hickey napisał(a):
Using jhash is a probably a good idea, the improved hash is broken
and will cause reordering in some circumstances:
return (h - q-dyn_min) * (q-hash_divisor - 1) / q-dyn_range;
dyn_min, dyn_max and dyn_range, as their name suggests, are adjusted
dynamically, so the
Hi installed Debian with bridging enabled then I install
squid.
Squid work if I manually enter proxy setting in firefox.
Then I ran the following to make it transparent:
echo 1
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
ebtables -t broute -A
BROUTING -p IPv4 --ip-protocol 6
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:33 -0400, Kurt Guenther wrote:
It looks like the reply to isn't set up on the list server?
No it's changed. In a nut shell. Hitting reply sends reply to sender of
email. Defaults to private.
Just about every mailer has a Reply To All, which does just that. So in
the
Wrong list, sorry, did not hit reply to all, and added wrong list in CC,
sorry.
--
Sincerely,
William L. Thomson Jr.
Obsidian-Studios, Inc.
http://www.obsidian-studios.com
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
