Using fwmark would mean that packets have to pass two filter systems. First
iptables, where the got marked and then the tc-filter ruleset where the mark
needs to be matched again. And this is something I want to avoid because
this means worse performance, so I was wondering if there is a possible
William Bohannan wrote:
the classify command which only works in the postrouting.
I'd try it, I think it works everywhere now the even if old docs say
different.
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
Andreas Unterkircher wrote:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016774.html
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol all u32 match u32 0 0 flowid 1:1
That will match all. Someone told me once that the difference between it
working and not on a large rule set was the explicit
Many thanks for the reply.
sfq's default queue of 128 may cause you some pain. You could try a pfifo
10 or recompile after modifying sch_sfq.c in your kernel tree.
I tried the above (modifying to 10) but didn't notice much difference.
Also, using
the prio parameter with htb may not do what
On Monday April 17 2006 18:56, Cahyo Purnomo wrote:
Dear All,
I wanna to implement of bandwith shapingin my office using HTB, any
body suggest about the case ?
Below the acl ip range i want to limit :
1. staf (10.0.0.1 - 3) -- limit to 10kbyte/s
2. lab (10.0.0.4 - 6) -- limit to 5kbyte/s
