[LARTC] LoadBalancing on many asimetric different dsl's.

Hi, my company have just bought new network and I have question about one problem. As in topic we must use few completely different dsl's and balance traffic between them. 2M/0,5M 4Mb/0,5M 8M/0,5M M=Mb/s I've never done such thing before so I have doubts how it will work. If the links are

Re: [LARTC] LoadBalancing on many asimetric different dsl's.

Hello, I've done this some montsh ago, with a command like: ip route add default equalize scope global nexthop via $EXTGW1 dev $EXTIF1 weight 1 nexthop via $EXTGW2 dev $EXTIF2 weight 1 However, this is not the problem. While loadbalancing of simple requests worked fine, there where problems

Re: [LARTC] LoadBalancing on many asimetric different dsl's.

On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:03:21AM +0100, Jordi Segues wrote: Hello, I've done this some montsh ago, with a command like: ip route add default equalize scope global nexthop via $EXTGW1 dev $EXTIF1 weight 1 nexthop via $EXTGW2 dev $EXTIF2 weight 1 However, this is not the problem. While

[LARTC] routing patches seem to break output nat

Hi We have applied the routing patches from http://www.ssi.bg/%7Eja/#routes. To 2.6.15 this seems to have broken our output natting. Has anyone else experienced this or any advice on how to fix. Is this working on the newer kernel i.e. 2.6.19 ? Any help would be appreciated. -- Tim Haak

Re: [LARTC] LoadBalancing on many asimetric different dsl's.

the above is actually covered in the wiki howto. Bu tyou need to setup snat on each interface, then connection tracking takes care of sending each stream out the right interface, you need to use snat and not MASQ. Great news :) And thankyou for the details. But could you give the link to the

Re: [LARTC] LoadBalancing on many asimetric different dsl's.

On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Jordi Segues wrote: the above is actually covered in the wiki howto. Bu tyou need to setup snat on each interface, then connection tracking takes care of sending each stream out the right interface, you need to use snat and not MASQ. Great news

[LARTC] traffic shaping question

Hi list, I have read the lartc 9th chapter, the bandwidth management part. I think I understand the principle, but I have a question. So I have a firewall that has several different interfaces. The most important for my question is the Internet interface, which is a 2mbps leased line. I have an

Re: [LARTC] traffic shaping question

Nagy Gabor Peter wrote: So I thought that I will create a virtual interface, and route all traffic from the Internet through this one. So incoming on Internet interface, outgoing on virtual interface, and from there incoming on the firewall machine, or outgoing on the LAN or the DMZ

RE: [LARTC] HTB? (NEWBIE)

How the guide say I expect to see on router (with command tc -s qdisc ls dev eth0) that unclassified traffic, like ssh, get rounded to 20: but it doesn't happen. - Traffic just doesn't get rounded to a class. If you want traffic going to a class you need to specify a filter. Did you by

[LARTC] routing in tunnel mode

Hello, Looking here http://www.ipsec-howto.org/x299.html I've set up a vpn in transport mode with two linux boxes. I'm now trying to set it up in tunnel mode. After using the example keys, trying to ping, it doesn't work because the route network isn't routable. This mention is in the howto

[LARTC] ipip tunnel docs broken

Hello, Looking here http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.tunnel.ip-ip.html It says to load a new_tunnel.o module. There is no such module on 2.6.9, so where would I find up-to-date documentation on ip tunnels in the Linux kernel? Thanks, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED], 613-592-2122

[LARTC] aes unsupported algorithm for ipsec?

Hi all, I'm trying to create a IPsec tunnel from a Debian Etch machine to a Cisco PIX. Part of my config is the following: add x.x.x.x x.x.x.x esp 34501 -m tunnel -E aes-ctr abcdefghijklmnop; When I try to set this using setkey, it fails with the following message: line 9: unsupported

[LARTC] two internet providers

hello i have slackware installed and i have two internet connections , ADSL(2,5mbps) + CableModem(1mbps) i want to share the connections in a small network NAT for the ADSL connection, and a proxy server for the cablemodem connection i searched all over the internet (probably not where i was

Re: [LARTC] LoadBalancing on many asimetric different dsl's.

Thanks for all your answers. I ask my question in different way because I still don't get answer which will be satysfying for me. Did anybody set similar configuration in the past? Have someone any suggestions how to set it to configure loadbalancing to avoid situation when one link is empty or

Re: [LARTC] DGD patch not detecting dead gateway

Hi! Thank you. Manish Kathuria escreveu: On 1/19/07, Tom Lobato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all! I applied http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.8-10.diff patch to kernel 2.6.8.1 and it works fine, or almost fine. It does the load balancing well, but when one link is dropped it continues

[LARTC] determine internet connection duration

Anyone has idea of what would be the best way to track connection time some a particular user to the internet ? Imagine a wifi network where the users will connect to the system via DHCP ( there is no PPPOE session involved ). If there is a need to track internet usage based on connection time