Hello,
I made some tests with HTB, and i usually set MTU to the default value of
TCP_WMEM (that is 65536 for me).
I have this case :
50 Mbits/s 10 Mbits/s
A--B---C
if A send to B,
On 10/10/07 22:44, Tony Hagans wrote:
Currently I have a setup that involves connections from several
different providers ranging from 6 mbit DSL's to 10 mbit fractional
DS3 connections tied together to provide multipath high availability
internet in our area for schools and businesses. We
Hi There,
We currently using iproute2 for load balancing. However we need more
upload speed as we load balance over 3 dsl lines.
I've been looking for a way to combine the upload speed to more
faster. Found a site called www.upstreaminter.net where these guys
bond the adsl channels to improve
On 10/11/07 10:17, the sew wrote:
We currently using iproute2 for load balancing. However we need more
upload speed as we load balance over 3 dsl lines.
*nod*
I've been looking for a way to combine the upload speed to more
faster. Found a site called www.upstreaminter.net where these guys
On 10/11/07 11:18, Grant Taylor wrote:
Another option you could look in to if you have access to a system
with high speed (read OC-1 or better) internet access somewhere is
tunnels. That is create an IP in IP or GRE tunnel from your external
IP to a co-located system and then load balance
Hi Grant,
Thanks for all the info, I like your SDSL option with the ospf,
exactly what I would like
Our situation is quite simple, Our ISP is telkom, one main Provider
for our Country, they will not touch anything other than the standard
services they provide. No SDSL, only ADSL. with standard
On 10/11/07 13:12, the sew wrote:
Thanks for all the info, I like your SDSL option with the ospf,
exactly what I would like
*nod* I like it too. :)
Our situation is quite simple, Our ISP is telkom, one main Provider
for our Country, they will not touch anything other than the standard
Thanks for the input Grant, we have kicked around the idea of BGP or a similar
method for the routing but the issue is that NAT takes place at the box doing
the multiwan. We only have a few external IP addresses and all of our
connections are from different vendors so they are spread across
On 10/11/07 14:07, Tony Hagans wrote:
Thanks for the input Grant, we have kicked around the idea of BGP or
a similar method for the routing but the issue is that NAT takes
place at the box doing the multiwan. We only have a few external IP
addresses and all of our connections are from
Hi all,
I have managed to setup a Fedora 7 box with 3 ethernet cards and two ADSL
modem/routers from different suppliers as LARTC recommends. I am able to
direct traffic for specific internal IPs either to one or the other ADSL
line. However, I am faced with two problems I am struggling for the
SIP is pretty easy. Normally it uses 5060 port. But prioritizing this
port traffic won't enhance the overall voice quality.
RTP ports are decided dynamically during SIP handshake. To filter RTP
protocol from packet pattern will delay the traffic. So using port
number is easier way, BUT, you need
Kostas Flokos wrote:
Hi all,
I have managed to setup a Fedora 7 box with 3 ethernet cards and two
ADSL modem/routers from different suppliers as LARTC recommends. I am
able to direct traffic for specific internal IPs either to one or the
other ADSL line. However, I am faced with two problems
Salim S I wrote:
SIP is pretty easy. Normally it uses 5060 port. But prioritizing this
port traffic won't enhance the overall voice quality.
RTP ports are decided dynamically during SIP handshake. To filter RTP
protocol from packet pattern will delay the traffic. So using port
number is easier
13 matches
Mail list logo
