+1
-Original Message-
From: lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl] On
Behalf Of Russell Stuart
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2011 9:41 AM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] List fault?
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:24 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> All in favo
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:19:22AM +0100, Radek 'Goblin' Pieczonka wrote:
>
>>> Suppose, I have 3 mail servers @ DMZ zone with one real ip. the situation
>>> as before?
>>>
>>> in that case, What can I do?
>>>
>> your could use exim/postfix and route the mail to the right server, but I
>> gu
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:09:52PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > see cache_peer !!
> >
> > squid can load balance between 3 servers and cache it !!
> >
> > run squid on your box with real ip..
> >
> > Thanks for your quick answer. I know about reverse proxy. I wanted to know
> >
in period
of time as from 8:00am - 12:00pm bandwith 200kbps and from 12:00pm-16:00pm
100 kbps. And so on. Depend of the stadistic I assume.
And reload the script several time with crob.
Does anyone knows a better way?
Regards.
--
Alex Segura N.
Jefe de Proyectos Redes - VoIP
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunately not easy without doing local NAT (from the local interface
> > to another local interface).
Can you use marking, mark the packet in the mangle table, us iptables t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:07:10PM +1000, Tim Groeneveld wrote:
> Greeting all,
>
> I have a bit of a complicated question.
>
> I have two ethernet devices, eth1 and eth2.
>
> eth1 is where my internet comes from. It is in the form of
> 202.172.122.208/29.
> It has another IP range, 202.172.12
Hi
Currently I use snmp to scrap information from my router about its interfaces,
does any one have an easy way of scaping information from tc rules to place
into a rrd db ?
do I need to put together a perl script to extract it from the output ?
Alex
signature.asc
Description: Digital
sound like you need a routing protocol, if you have access to manage all the
routers
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:44:09PM -0600, Tony Hagans wrote:
> Currently I have a setup that involves connections from several different
> providers ranging from 6 mbit DSL's to 10 mbit fractional DS3 connectio
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:48:13PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Alex Samad wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:40:29PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Alex Samad wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:36:18PM -0700, D
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:40:29PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Alex Samad wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:36:18PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'm trying to create a routed VPN using OpenVPN - and having trouble with
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:36:18PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to create a routed VPN using OpenVPN - and having trouble with
> the routing concepts involved. Let me see if I can properly describe my
> current topology:
>
> Server -
> LAN, with both local workstations and
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:25:11PM +0500, Arman wrote:
> Thats fine but primary problem is that only one connection is used at a time
> but I want to utilize both at the same time. Please guide
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Jorge Evangelista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: lar
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:23:23PM -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 06/21/07 17:18, Alex Samad wrote:
> >sorry yep, just woken up, reading and answering whilst eating breakfast
>
> *nod*
>
> >okay then why not
> >
> >default via preffered path
> >default
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 04:24:19PM -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 06/21/07 16:01, Alex Samad wrote:
> >should something like this work
> >
> >default proto static metric 5
> > nexthop via 58.173.108.1 dev vlan2 weight 10
> > nexthop via 10.20.20.106 d
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:35:13PM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Grant Taylor wrote:
>
> >I need a way for the Linux kernel to try to use a default gateway and
> >switch to another one if it does not see any traffic.
should something like this work
default proto static metric 5 nexthop via
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:35:46PM -0500, Greg Scott wrote:
> > out of curiosity why would you want to bridge at the firewall. is
> this meant to be a drop in-line firewall appliance
>
> Long story but yes, it is essentially a drop in-line system. It's a
> mess.
>
> So will that Internet rout
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:54:46PM -0500, Greg Scott wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Still plugging away at my Linux bridge/firewall and thinking through the
> consequences. In a normal firewall situation, the Internet is on one
> side, the internal LAN on the other. Duh! But now, with a Linux bridge
> in th
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:50:30AM +0800, Salim S I wrote:
> I solved it, thought a bit ugly.
>
> Have two more rules now in ip ru
>
> 32150: from all lookup main
> 32201: from all fwmark 0x200/0x200 lookup wan1_route
> 32202: from all fwmark 0x400/0x400 lookup wan2_route
> 32203: from 10.20.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:48:01PM +0800, Salim S I wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Luciano Ruete [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 11:28 AM
> To: Salim S I
> Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Multihome load balancing - kernel vs netfilter
>
In http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/dgd.txt I read:
--
- key "gw" for ip_route_output used to select the right route for the
gateway
- key "lsrc" for ip_route_input used to find the best unicast route
between this IP and the destination address (similar to output routing
call but still makes t
I'm using a 2.6.20-15-ubuntu (shipped with feisty) kernel with
Julian's patches applied and it's my 3rd day with tc, ip, ifconfig and
the rest ;).
Got 2 ADSL uplinks. What I need is an ability to manually configure
uplink usage, so nothing like bonding by default. Failover is meant to
be provided
-m mark --mark 0 -j mymark
>
Hi
i know there was a thread on this methiod earlier, but has somebody put up a
howto, or a wiki page on it ?
alex
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:22:13AM +0530, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> On 3/2/07, Tom Lobato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Hi all!
> >
> >
> >After that good thread "DGD patch not detecting dead gateway" I was
> >able to set up a Load Balancing with ping based DGD (without Julian
> >Ana
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:12:17AM +0700, Denny Zulfikar wrote:
> Hello korey,
>
> I don't think your configuration will work well, because there're
> balancing using "weight" connection. So, if you have
> connection-oriented-application that must sure passing their traffic
> only from one connect
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:23:42PM +0800, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
> From: "Luciano Ruete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This solution works in theory and in practice, so plz, get your hands dirty
> > before you post your next great idea.
> >
>
> I understand your explanation fully but believe me I
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:30:48AM +0100, Paul Viney wrote:
> > > I still seem to have much the same problem. I no longer get ICMP
> > > unreachable errors, but the packet just seems to disappear - I can't see
> > > it being forwarded on any interface, nor can I find any kind of reply -
> > > icmp
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:54:51PM +0100, Paul Viney wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, Alex. I've been able to add both default routes - I
> hadn't considered using the metric to avoid using the VPN link.
> I guess I wasn't very clear with my use of 64.233.183.103, wh
1.248.86 metric 20
default via 144.132.144.1 dev vlan2 src 144.132.147.156 metric 30
The difference for you should be in the default table, you will not need
default proto static metric 5
nexthop via 144.132.144.1 dev vlan2 weight 1
nexthop via 10.20.20.168 dev ppp0 w
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:17:03PM +0100, Fabio Muzzi wrote:
>
> Hi, this is my first post to the list.
>
> I have googled a lot, and still cannot find a proper solution. I hope
> someone here will be able to shed some light on my doubts.
>
> I have set up a firewall using kernel 2.6.15
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:14:56AM +0900, GodSharp wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Just wondering for some reason when I switched providers(DSL) IP aliasing
> stopped working. And, I am not sure what kind of modem this is, the previous
> one had some Ethernet ports at the back(it has a bult-in 4 port switch
This link below gives the details on how to setup a multi link connection
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
Alex
>
>
>
metric 5
> >nexthop via 144.132.144.1 dev vlan2 weight 1
> >nexthop via 10.20.20.230 dev ppp0 weight 20
> >default via 10.20.20.230 dev ppp0 src 60.241.248.86 metric 20
> >default via 144.132.144.1 dev vlan2 src 144.132.145.38 metric 30
> >
> >
144.132.144.1 dev vlan2 src 144.132.145.38 metric 30
This works fine for me, I have tracked packets with tcpdump on both the server
and the client.
Alex
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jordi Segues
>
> On 22 Jan 2007 09:49:28 +0100, sAwAr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &g
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 06:44:54PM -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 01/15/07 15:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Wow, that's a complicated solution. Nicely done:) But I think that's a
> >bit too complicated for my setup thx for the input anyway.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Indeed the set up is not simple.
to guess but this line
default via 10.0.0.1 dev eth0
costs less to use than
default via 10.0.0.1 dev eth1 metric 1
so it should never use the second. I say guess cause I don't know what the
default metric is if you do add one.
What you want it to look something like i
suggest using the latest, although beta version (0.8.1_rc1) of
ipp2p. But that's just me.
Alex
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
ed ips in the same subnet.
Maybe dividing into multiple vlans would be a better idea?
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Marek Kierdelewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] arp flood (offtopic?)
Hi guys,
H
Hi guys,
Sorry if this is a little offtopic, but I was wandering what can one do to
prevent/stop arp flooding ?
Thanks,
Alex
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by LG-Network(http://www.lgnet.ro), and is
believed to be clean
Hi all,
Short question: what happens with the mark on a packet once it's out of the
box? Is is usable in another computer in the network or the mark is only valid
in the same box you've marked the packet?
Thank you,
Alex___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mai
Hi,
Just a short question:
in documentation (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html) it appears
that "Also, with HTB, you should attach all filters to the root!" . Is it
older information or you can not attach filter to the inner qdiscs at all?
Thank you,
alex__
with aliases...
Anybody can help me here ?
Regards
Alex
technology that is
quoted with kbits meaning 1024bit/s.
-alex
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> A new version of the iproute2 utilities is available to handle the new
> extensions for 2.6.7.
> * Based on the last known good version of iproute2 from Alexy
>
would change all multipliers (for
input as well as output) to 1000 or 1024? That way, nothing existing will
be broken, and a warning should be placed in documentation that without -k
flag, results are misleading.
I'll leave the default selection for -k/-K up to you.
Alternatively,
(tc
Unfortunately, not that easy.
Look at ipt_ROUTE (from netfilter) to do it.
-alex
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Egon Eckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to mark locally generated packets in the OUTPUT chain and do
> policy based routing (selecting one of two default gateways) based on
a) this has nothing to do with Linux.
b) if you have to ask these questions, you will not be able to do it.
-alex
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Prajith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to port ALTQ(Alternate Queueing) software form the FreeBSD to QNX.
> It's more like a bandwidth manager.
test everything, setup test networks etc.
> for 300$.
Thanks to jamal's latest tc action patch, and some perl duct tape
(essentially polling the load per index, and modifying the "capacity"
based on incoming announcements), I'
ce_dump).
Adding external traffic to policer structures is somewhat tricky, but I'm
sure it is possible. At this point, I only care about EWMA, which isn't
all that hard.
Budget and bounty: 300$
Any takes?
-alex
___
LARTC mailing li
ixes this is probably 7000 addreses so on
> each packet 7000 tests will be done.
Incorrect. Linux route lookup is crappy, but not THAT crappy.
Route-cache somewhat helps too.
-alex
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/m
oute for packet classification
> or it can be simulated with netfilters connmark module.
> then amount of test to be done will be more than half of active connections
> number.
Sorry - my bad, I thought that the poster *was* talking about using route
(and realm) for packet classification and t
to 2 secs.
Is there an option to put (for instance) all UDP traffic at the beginning of
the output queue?
Thanks,
Alex
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
o put (for instance) all UDP traffic at the beginning of
the output queue?
Thanks,
Alex
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
X.
I use one class C private with private ips + another 2 class C for tunels.
Maybe this message is because my users frequently scan the network with
WS_PING to see what users are online (this produces arp-requests for each ip
in that ip class)?
Alex Iruc
- Original Message -
From: &q
d to strange to happen
all of the sudden in 1-3 hours time.
So, maybe I'm wrong, but these messages are a bit too weird to happed so
many at once. Any ideeas?
Thanks
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Santiago J. Ruano Rincón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex
What is the cause for such a message while running kernel 2.6.1 on RH9 ?
Neighbour table overflow.
NET: 282 messages suppressed.
Neighbour table overflow.
Alex Iruc
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo
(I don;t think so...)
or do I have to get another patch. If so, from where?
Alex Iruc
Administrator Retea
LG-NET
http://www.hostingcenter.ro
Suport Tehnic: [E
After few hours of looking, I couldn't find a way to combine ("and")
different filters.
Example: I need to police ingress traffic coming from certain source IPs
(which are best expressed with u32 filter) and going to certain routes
(which are best expressed with route filter).
What I was tryin
(I don;t think so...)
or do I have to get another patch. If so, from where?
Alex Iruc
Network Administrator
LG-NET
http://www.hostingcenter.ro
Suport Tehnic: [E
> Isn't the same possible in /lartc.org 12.3.2. Overlimit actions / and
> "reclassify" option /which i din't used yet/.
Interesting idea - Let me try if this works first.
> next, you must use IMQ to pass every traffic from eth2, /because as i'm
> thinking there isn't possible to do reclassify pack
Hello,
If any of kernel hackers wants to make some money:
For 300$:
What I need is a netfilter match rule that would match on depth of a queue
on a given device. Example:
iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -m queue_backlog --device eth0.1
--depth-gt 10 -j
If you can complete this in a reasonabl
each client of speed
x in class 4, for each client of speed y in class 5, and so on..
1
/ \
/ \
2 3
/ | \ / | \
4 5 6 7 8 9
Thanks!
Alex
___
LARTC mailing list / [
Hi,
I'am looking for tcng examples where ingress is used.
Please post me some (working) examples, no need for explanation.
Thank you
Alex
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
gs.debian.org/215629
Here goes the story, thanks for any tip on the subject.
Alex
I would like to add a fwmark filter to the original HTB based
LARTC "WonderShaper" script (http://lartc.org/wondershaper/).
I am using a self compiled kernel from latest sarge
kernel-source-2.4.22 an
t ceil
256kbit prio 5
/sbin/tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:10 protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip dst
192.168.254.11 flowid 4:12
etc (full script at http://retea.hostingcenter.ro/htb.txt)
Thanks!
Alex
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
I have everything cbq/htb and all the QoS stuff compiled directly in the
kernel, not as a module. The script is at
http://retea.hostingcenter.ro/htb.txt since is about 46k and is too big to
post here.
Thanks.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Stef Coene" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
:2" is unparsable
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Thanks!
Alex
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
I forgot to say that I have put my script on
http://retea.hostingcenter.ro/htb.txt
Maybe someone could lead to to the correct sintax if there's something
wrong.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Stef Coene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex" <[EMAIL PROT
fter marking of the packets.
Thanks again.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Stef Coene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lartc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:59 PM
ternational how would
the "tc" command be?
Something like:
/sbin/tc class add dev eth2 parent 1:2 classid 2:11 htb rate 50kbit ceil
100kbit prio 5
/sbin/tc filter add dev eth2 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip dst
192.168.254.10 flowid 1:11
Would this be the correct commands?
Thanks
country. What I don't know is how to continue the script with assigning
lower limits to everything else not going from ip's in --set-mark 6.
Maybe some of can enlighten me about this.
Thanks,
Alex
#!/bin/sh
#Mark metro packets
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -d 213.154.1
and then configure lilo or
grub, whatever you have.
btw, if you do "make bzlilo" it will work even if you have grub installed
instead of lilo ( it will copy the thing to /boot but you will also see a
error about lilo.conf, but nothing to worry about )
Alex
- Original Message ---
ybe I'm missing something...
Thanks for help.
Alex
btw, on lartc.org in the howto at split access section there is a mention
about
"Reader Rod Roark notes: 'If $P0_NET is the local network and $IF0 is its
interface, the following additional entries are desirable:
ip route add $P0
t I found on the net are a little
confusing.
I also need to prioritize interactive traffic (IRC and yahoo/msn messengers)
and ICMP ping (to impress my boss :-) ).
The documentation has done nothing but to confuse me in this situation.
Please help me with this!
Thank you in advance for any
Does this patch work on kernel 2.4.21 or 2.4.22? (I'm curently using 2.4.21
and planning to switch to 2.4.22 in near future)
Thanks.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Martin A. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jihoon Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Does this patch work on kernel 2.4.21 or 2.4.22? (I'm curently using 2.4.21
and planning to switch to 2.4.22 in near future)
Thanks.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Martin A. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jihoon Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
help me at all.
Thanks,
Alex
Here the script that I use: (192.168.55.1 is another router which actualy
has the second line conected physicaly and on that router I do SNAT for the
squid machine)
IF0="eth1"
IF1="eth2"
IF2="eth0"
IP0="192.168.254.125"
IP1=&qu
maybe some of you know any better solutions?
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Gabriel Lorenzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Monitoring traffic
> Here is my tip.
>
, just something
to show them hou much traffic they did.
I'm currently using net-acct mysql but with little success because on RH9
the netacctd daemon dies unexpectedly sometimes without any error.
Thanks!
Alex
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROT
r 10.1.1.5
I've looked over the adv routing howto, but can't see how I would
implement it according to section 4.2.1, as I won't always know our ip
address for the adsl connection.
Could someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks,
Alex
. In the example, however, classes are being attached to other
classes. Can anybody explain to me how this works?
Sorry if this is a silly question.
Thanks,
Alex
snip
9.5.5.1. Sample configuration
Functionally almost identical to the CBQ sample configuration above:
# tc qdisc ad
gging in iptables but reading the logs is kind of
tiresome. I rather have something like iptraf but that can be run
after the fact.
alex
--
Alex Polite
http://plusseven.com/gpg
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/ma
bert hubert said:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Alex Bennee wrote:
>> A. Peter Mee said:
>> >
>> > Could someone give me some pointers to achieving stable cvs and rcp
>> > access through a fairly restrictive firewall.
>> >
>>
&g
PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Alex
www.bennee.com/~alex/
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
rough differnt traffic shapers.
See the Section 9 of the lartc HOWTo:
http://lartc.org/HOWTO//cvs/2.4routing/html/c427.html
For an intro to the options you have available.
Alex
www.bennee.com/~alex/
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://m
l and write rules accordingly
There is nothing wrong with having multiple layers of firewalls. It means
your haxor has several layers of security to beat - security through depth.
But you can just use iptables on your internal firewall as well. No point
learning new s
mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bennee.com/~alex/
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
lassifications
I use (which go by traffic type) but use network matches instead.
You should also read the htb manual (http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/)
as it contains some useful worked examples that are pretty clear about the
paremeters for htb shapers.
Alex
www.bennee.com/~alex/
___
ables does this already but if I can match and tag a
packet based on the time of the connection I can still allow new
connections to get priority of long lived downloads. This may involve
writting a new kernel module as a netfilter extension but it would be the
iceing on the cake to my setup :-)
Alex
w
script that can be found on my websites CVS
pages (under software) but its not fully integrated yet.
Enjoy,
Alex.
function setup_shaping ()
{
# Setup POSTROUTING marking on dsl output
# needed for QoS type hacks
# 1 - outgoing interactive (ssh)
# 2 - outgoing file stuf
k in relation to the filters. I've been looking for any good
examples that show iptables -j MARK, prio and filter being used together
but have yet to come up with any good ones. If I get this to work your
welcome to use it in the FAQ :-)
Alex
www.bennee.com/~alex/
_
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Kurt Wagner wrote:
> Howdi Alex,
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Alex Leyva wrote:
>
> > I've been triying with diferent values for burst, limit and latency,
but
> > we cant understand how to determine the correct values for them.
> >
> Now,
ormal?.
Thanks.
Alex Leyva
Gobierno del Distrito Federal
Oficialia Mayor
Comite Ejecutivo de Desarrollo Informatico
Direccion de Nuevas Tecnologias
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
91 matches
Mail list logo
