Re: [LARTC] Re: htb traffic shaping problem

2006-09-18 Thread Bugzilla-Redirect
2006, Andy Furniss wrote: gypsy wrote: Bugzilla-Redirect wrote: Yes, the output is below: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:09:2A:A6:F6 inet addr:10.0.0.50 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:424486

Re: [LARTC] Re: htb traffic shaping problem

2006-09-15 Thread Bugzilla-Redirect
Yes, the output is below: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:09:2A:A6:F6 inet addr:10.0.0.50 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:4244867 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets

[LARTC] Re: htb traffic shaping problem

2006-09-12 Thread Bugzilla-Redirect
Eric, here's the information you requested with the mtu set at 1500 (see further below): - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth0 qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 99 direc

[LARTC] Re: htb traffic shaping problem (Charlie Meyer)

2006-09-09 Thread Bugzilla-Redirect
Eric, I've attached the output from the command you requested below. I'm using kernel 2.6.17.12 and tc version ss060323. I'm have a nforce4 onboard giggabit controller using the forcedeth driver, if that makes a difference. Charlie, I'll take a look at the Apache model for throttling, thanks.

[LARTC] htb traffic shaping problem

2006-09-08 Thread Bugzilla-Redirect
Hello. I have a linux server connected to a gigabit lan, and though that lan to a 768kbps/768kbps DSL modem. I'm trying to shape my webserver running on port 80/443 down to 512kbps, while leaving all other ports alone. The current configuration script that I'm using is as follows: tc qdisc