jump for joy when the 64kbit link goes down... (keeping in mind that policing is
no guarantee that you'll actually stay below 64kbit usage, especially if a lot
of the traffic is UDP).
- Original Message -----
From:
Kenneth Kalmer
To: Chris Bennett ; Taylor
Grant
Cc: lartc
You can't split a particular IP connection
between two links, but can instead only determine which link a
particular connection will occur on. Given this, it sounds like you
want to have some way to detect that Link A is already saturated and then send
all further connections to Link B unti
e the
overhead incurred by bridged mode over ATM (RFC 2684/1483).
I would say "now I can sleep peacefully", but I just woke up a couple of
hours ago... so I'll go for a run instead ;)
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Furniss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &q
Thanks! Very prescient of you, since my latest test results prove exactly
what you said about needing a higher overhead value! :)
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Furniss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday,
I was able to do some further testing today with a full crew of players on
my game servers. I cleaned up my script a bit to make it easier to modify
the MPU and OVERHEAD, and also added both settings to the root class for
completeness sake (not sure that matters at all). I'll include the final
I'm running some tests as you suggested. I'll have to wait til there are
more players on my servers again before I can get some more accurate
results, but preliminary tests show that 1) the overhead setting is quite
significant and 2) my overhead value of 24 is a bit too low.
With overhead set
I know there is that handy patch available to very efficiently use ATM
bandwidth, but I was wondering what the best values to use with a
non-patched iproute2 would be. Anyone here care to check my logic in coming
up with these numbers and perhaps suggest better values?
My transmit speed is 768
In the case where you have a router (that is not generating signficant
traffic itself) with one internet facing interface and one LAN facing
interface, you really don't need IMQ.
It becomes very useful in alternate cases where, for example, you have
multiple interfaces facing the internet (eg,
When you say you are so close but can't get your head around the final
part... what do you mean? Exactly what is working and what is not? How far
have you gotten?
- Original Message -
From: "brooke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 4:56 PM
Subject: [LARTC] 2
There appears to be a pretty serious router bug in kernel 2.6.8. One
reference to it is here:
http://www.debiantalk.com/_Bug279666_kernel-image-2_6_8-1-k7_Runs_out_of_network_buffers-10116882-5788-a.html
and a followup that it may now be fixed in later kernels here:
http://lists.debian.org/deb
luck. Try it out.. write a paper, become famous.
----- Original Message -
From: "Gomi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<"lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl"@alpha.symbio.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [LART
I'm not sure what you mean by AI. I suppose you could mean that you're
going to feed various QoS parameters into a neural net and "teach" the
neural net to vary the parameters according to conditions... but somehow I
think it unlikely that this is what you mean.
What is the specific situation
Title: Mensagem
My solution to this exact problem isn't
exactly what you asked for, but I'll tell you anyway because it turned out to be
s easy and work s well.
On my LAN I created a /23 subnet. For
example, lets say it is 192.168.2.0/23, giving us 192.168.2.0 -
192.168.3.255. I
I don't personally know a way to do that (maybe someone else does), but I
can say that I've tweaked my shaping script with over 50 users playing
online games on my servers, and the script runs so quickly that even though
it drops and rebuilds the qdiscs, no one even notices the blip.
- Orig
s about as elegant as possible
with a script. Very nice. That goes right into my routing script.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Martin A. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday
I've had the same problem. I sorta wish there was an "ip rule flush"
command that would leave only the default rules.
Anyway, what I do to prevent my rules from getting out of hand is every time
I add a rule, I first delete the very same rule. This prevents the
duplicates, at least.
So every
Hi Frank,
I forgot to copy the list earlier so this will be a dup for you (sorry)...
Anyway, in your message you say "contradicting to Chris..." in reference to
me saying that only the IP and MAC of the NAT router would be visible to the
ISP.
I'd like to fill in my knowledge gap here.. can you p
Cloning a MAC address really has nothing to do with particular act of hiding
multiple computers behind a firewall.
Sometimes an ISP will register the MAC address of a particular device to
make sure you don't use any other device. Cloning the MAC address is a way
of getting around this so you c
thing deferred when I send through
procmail for spamassassin...
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Jake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Chris Bennett'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 11:56 PM
Subject: R
Hi ro0ot,
You may be running into the same problem that I was dealing with this
weekend.
I tried to follow the LARTC FAQ on multiple internet connections (in my case
two ADSL connections) and I found that the information got me most of the
way but not the whole way.
Specifically, the thing tha
What I do is have the linux box claim all of the public IPs as its own, and
then use IPTABLES to DNAT/SNAT to/from private IPs as needed. You can
dedicate a public IP to a specific private IP, so the computer on your
network with that private IP appears to all of the world as if it actually
ha
Next week I'm replacing my single SDSL connection with two ADSL connections.
I've got a plan for dealing with this, but I'd like any thoughts on
potential problems I might run into.
My goal is not to load balance the bandwidth (yet), but I do want to run all
traffic through a single router. At
22 matches
Mail list logo
