Hi
I using original version. I have merget only this patch:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jiri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
On Mar 12, Corey Hickey posted
here(http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q1/012038.html)
an updated esfq patch for ker
Hello
I using for this stuff application "parprouted":
http://freshmeat.net/projects/parprouted/?topic_id=150
Lim Kee Chian wrote:
Hi all,
not sure this should be post here but i hope some one could help
me. :>
I'm newbie in the ebtables MAC address NAT and filtering stuff...
i want to b
Patrick McHardy wrote:
I haven't followed the discussion, but this is the way it is supposed to
work. As IMQ can queue packets for multiple devices it is not possible
to couple the dequeue event with the "real" output device's dequeue
event, simply because there may be multiple. Use non-work-cons
Andy Furniss wrote:
Jiri Fojtasek wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
Jiri Fojtasek wrote:
Hello Roy
Roy wrote:
>Hello,
>imq became realy popular now ;)
> >
Sure, same as whole GNU/Linux :)
>It would be good ir you wrote what is that EOS to save time for
some people
>on sea
Andy Furniss wrote:
Jiri Fojtasek wrote:
Hello Roy
Roy wrote:
>Hello,
>imq became realy popular now ;)
> >
Sure, same as whole GNU/Linux :)
>It would be good ir you wrote what is that EOS to save time for
some people
>on searches.
>
> >
EOS - End of Send. I
Hello all
I have done next version of my IMQ implementation:
Fixed bug with spinlock in dev_queue_xmit()
Addet experimental support for ingress queue (just only IPV4)
Addet some comments to the sources
Fixed example in README + new example for ingress
The kernel patch for 2.4.25 was
Roy wrote:
>> >seems you may be unable shape ingress then. what basicaly voids
all imq
>> >purpose.
>> >
>>Iam not sure. Every packet comin in in to router must come out !!! So we
>>need only shape out trafics. Incoming trafics we cannot shape, only
>>police. We cannot change speed and rate of i
Roy wrote:
>this is qute intersting, and it happens on every computer not only on
bussy
>ones
>but in reality I dont see any need for that, because tcp itself should
take
>care of this issue.
>
Right but you lost TCP interactivity and overloaded WiFi interface is
painfull itself !!!
>anyway t
Hello Roy
Roy wrote:
>Hello,
>imq became realy popular now ;)
>
>
Sure, same as whole GNU/Linux :)
>It would be good ir you wrote what is that EOS to save time for some
people
>on searches.
>
>
>
EOS - End of Send. Its time betwen two dequeues and packet transmits
used by qdisc for calculati
Hello All
Its first time i posting to this mail list :). I have done something
(maybe) important. I write new IMQ device driver based from Martin
Devera and Patrick McHardy implementation with device EOS support. My
current implementation supporting only egress trafic shaping and kernel
2.4.25
10 matches
Mail list logo
