Re: [LARTC] HTB does not respect the prio parameter

Is quantum not perhaps a bit high? Try setting it lower, and see what happens? -justin On 2007-08-29 08:06, Martin Björnsson wrote: Hi all, I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me results I expect. I've created 4 HTB classes: 1:10 TCP ACKs

[LARTC] Traffic shaping questions and possible extensions

Hi, It has been quite a while since I looked at what was happening in Linux traffic shaping, so I am not sure if this has been discussed / improved on since I last looked. We use a traffic shaper based on HTB. The basic principals work fine, but we have a problem with 'intermittent trafic'

Re: [LARTC] Ethernet packet loss - frame errors

OK - Just finished more testing, and it seems to be a bug in the sky2 driver... ping -s 1450 -f xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx works perfectly, but ping -s 1500 -f xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx fails 100% with all packets being logged as frame errors. -justin Justin Schoeman wrote: Hi all, I have the following

Re: [LARTC] Ethernet packet loss - frame errors

Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:26:14 +0200 Justin Schoeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have the following problem. A Linux box configured as a bridge. One interface connects to the router via a crossover cable, the other connects to a switch via the cable that used

[LARTC] Ethernet packet loss - frame errors

Hi all, I have the following problem. A Linux box configured as a bridge. One interface connects to the router via a crossover cable, the other connects to a switch via the cable that used to go to the router. Now I get the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] net]# ifconfig eth3 eth3 Link

Re: [LARTC] Ethernet packet loss - frame errors

Andrei Sandu wrote: Possibly the length of the cable ? It is a 5m cable. It is also the 'common' cable - it is unplugged from the router and plugged into the bridge (the other side stays in the switch). -justin On 10/13/06, *Justin Schoeman* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

[LARTC] netfilter patch-o-matic: where did all the patches go?

Hi all, I haven't been paying attention to this for a while, but now that I download the latest patch-o-matic-ng, I see that most of the patches are gone... Anybody have an idea where I can download the 'extras' repository? Specifically geoip. Thanks! -justin

[LARTC] Netfilter/Iptables does not NAT all packets?

Hi all, I am having a small problem with netfilter on Linux kernel 2.6.11.4. It seems not all packets are hitting the pre-routing chain. In pre-routing, I have the following rules: $IPTABLES -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $IF_OUT -d 10.50.18.22 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.22 $IPTABLES -t

[LARTC] Hmmm... Weird results with HTB in kernel 2.6.11

Hi all, I have been getting some strange results with HTB in kernel 2.6.11, and was wondering if anybody could give me some advice. Also, if someone could direct me to the changelog for the recent versions so I can see if it is worth upgrading? Anyway, the problem can best be summed up by

Re: [LARTC] htb: HowTo identify squid cache hits

I haven't tried this myself, but I see l7filter (l7-filter.sf.net) has patterns for matching cache hits and misses... This may just work for your application? -justin Peter Kaagman wrote: Hi list... I work for a school in the netherlands with a 2mbit Internet uplink and about 3800 eager

Re: [LARTC] IP2P Skype question

I don't think Skype works very well with any of these. I have tried the l7-filter pattern, with no luck. Apparently, the big problem is that Skype traffic is encrypted, and so it is not possible to match it using fixed patterns. In some cases, it is possible to block Skype, as the existing

[LARTC] GeoIP?

Hi all, does anybody know what happened to GeoIP (www.geoip.net)? It seems I just get an empty page if I try go to the site now... Thanks, Justin ___ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

Re: [LARTC] ESFQ?

Thanks - really appreciate the help! -justin Andy Furniss wrote: Justin Schoeman wrote: Woohoo - that would be great! -justin Andy Furniss wrote: Justin Schoeman wrote: Ouch... Is there any other way to do host-based fair sharing (well, other than actually classifying each host :-( )? I don't

Re: [LARTC] ESFQ?

Woohoo - that would be great! -justin Andy Furniss wrote: Justin Schoeman wrote: Ouch... Is there any other way to do host-based fair sharing (well, other than actually classifying each host :-( )? I don't think it will take much to get it to work - though I haven't tried :-) . I'll have

[LARTC] ESFQ?

Hi again, I was just looking around for ESFQ sources, and I see that the main site is down, and only has kernel 2.6.4 patches. Is ESFQ maintained? If so, where can I find patches for 2.6.10? Thanks, -justin ___ LARTC mailing list /

Re: [LARTC] ESFQ?

level and the probability of ending up in the official kernel). Unfortunately, this seems to be fairly common in Linux QoS - too many one-man projects and too few resources too keep them going. --- Justin Schoeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi again, I was just looking around for ESFQ sources, and I

[LARTC] Interesting oopses...

OK - this is starting to get frustrating... Are there any known issues with 2.6.9 and traffic shaping? I am using 2.6.9 with geoip 20041115, and get odd oopses. The following script oopses my box: - #!/bin/sh -x IFOUT='eth1' IFIN='eth0'

Re: [LARTC] Shaping traffic on heavily oversubscribed links?

Thanks everybody for your advice... This is going to be an interesting one to try and solve ;-). -justin Justin Schoeman wrote: Hi all, I am having some fun with traffic shaping, and have run into an interesting situation. Here is South Africa, most internet links are heavily oversubscribed

[LARTC] HTB dropping packets while tokens available?

Hi again, I just ran into a seriously strange glitch, and was wondering if anybody had experienced this... I have an HTB class with an iptables classifier. The iptables classifier shows packets hitting the rule for this class. Now, HTB drops these packets ('dropped' increases), even although

[LARTC] Shaping traffic on heavily oversubscribed links?

Hi all, I am having some fun with traffic shaping, and have run into an interesting situation. Here is South Africa, most internet links are heavily oversubscribed, which means that in most cases the local link is _not_ the bottleneck, and shaping on the local link does not help that much...

Re: [LARTC] Traffic control and logging?

while doing up this solution as a proper kernel patch (does it have any chance of being accepted, or should I just do it 'quick-and-dirty' for my personal use? Thanks, Justin Justin Schoeman wrote: Hi all, I am new to tc on Linux, and am having some problems. The basic set-up and use works

[LARTC] Traffic control and logging?

Hi all, I am new to tc on Linux, and am having some problems. The basic set-up and use works wonderfully, but now I have run into a slight problem... I am using tc qdiscs and filters to do my traffic shaping. Now, I have a whole bunch of filters to classify the data, and they work well,