Hi,
Have a look at
http://ldp.kernelnotes.de/HOWTO/Querying-libiptc-HOWTO/bmeter.html
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
At 01:50 p.m. 01/08/03 -0300, you wrote:
Anybody knows about one bandwidth meter to use in Bering.
This is a script i built, it's works wel, but it's not very n
Hi, Chijioke,
Do you have a link?
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
At 07:49 a.m. 20/07/03 -0700, you wrote:
Lo All,
Linux is Catching up with Cisco in VoIP traffic management.
Alex Clouter of LARTC, just submitted a new QoS management tool using ESFQ,
for beta-testing, so far its working
host or it has just to be forwarded? Read
Stef´s remarks on the diagram:
Output routing : the local process selects a source address and a route.
This route is attached to the packet and used later.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
Practical QoS
http://opalsoft.net/qos
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
p too. This case the control is less
agressive and, perhaps, things go better. It´s just a matter to have time
and patient to make some tests.
You can search for more information on my site, below.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
Practical QoS
htt
Hi, Chijioke:
I have written something about VoIP using Linux that can be of interest for
you and any other interested in VoIP packet forwarding under Linux.
Have a look at http://opalsoft.net/qos/VoIP.htm
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
uot; = 1000. Is it
possible that it is implemented this way? I could see
high priority packets being dropped if this was the
implementation?
**
No, again, have a look to a previous e-mail I sent to Lars.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
Here you have a copy
vsTCP.htm.
Finally, to close this pleasing conversation, don't forget that when
you configure your "controller devices" you are not controlling TCP,
you are just conspiring against it by killing some packets and using
the simple rule, "if you lose a packet, cut your window"
the queue can be any sort of queue, but
certainly, not a PRIO queue. Then it´s not posible to ask on PRIO for something
that drops an already enqueue packet to make run for a new arriving one.
I suggest that configurations and tests made to reach that
, inmediately, with a
datagram that has its RST flag on.
Search for this side, perhaps you were lucky.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Also, in drop-tail queues, as its name imply and prio is, never a already
enqueue packet is dropped to make room for a new one. Packets are dropped
from the tail.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
r www flow? Are you measuring average or
instantaneous rates?
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
converge to every flow
sharing the upper level defined by the controller device, as soon as those
flows have enough packets to reclaim it.
Conclusion: use your bandwidth controllers but never forget the TCP natural
behavior.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
_
, but I'm always
late with my e-mail replies.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
cheers.
Having had another look at the kernel, and at the lartc howto it seems that
tc filter when policing may be able to reclassify out of profile traffic to
BE, but no more than this, without first putting traf
Andrew:
Differentiated Service on Linux HOWTO (work in progress) could be of some
help for you.
Have a look at http://opalsoft.net/qos
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
Message: 6
From: "Burnside, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[E
tle time have a look to this; any feedback, comment or
criticism is welcome.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi,
Have a look to: http://qos.ittc.ukans.edu/howto/index.html
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
At 02:40 p.m. 11/10/02 +0200, you wrote:
>Message: 9
>From: "Emmanuel SIMON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:39:00 +0200
Hi,
I wrote http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Querying-libiptc-HOWTO/ published by The
Linux Document Project.
It´s very simple C program. Hoping this can help you.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
At 06:29 a.m. 21/09/02 +0200, you wrote:
>Message: 1
>Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Hannes,
You are right. Thank to Stef for the information. I´ll take a copy too.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
At 06:35 p.m. 18/09/02 +0200, you wrote:
>Message: 5
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 10:04:36 +0200
>From: Hannes Ebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
Hi,
Have a look to tbf. It has a selectable latency parameter that adjust the
queue length. http://lartc.org/lartc.txt paragraph 9.2.2. Token Bucket
Filter can give you more information.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
At 06:45 p.m. 17/09/02 +0200, you wrote:
>Message: 12
>Date: T
opped with no mercy (udp is an unresponssive
protocol) hurting quality.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
Ps: Cisco has (check your IOS version) RTP header compression that can help
a lot to lowering bandwidth requirements. You have to enable it at both
sides of the link. Also, why don't tr
k to
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-hacking-HOWTO.txt
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
OUTPUT before mangle OUTPUT but after OUTPUT ROUTING.
mangle POSTROUTING before nat POSTROUTING.
conntrack POSTROUTING after nat POSTROUTING but before QOS EGRESS.
when discussion matures I will post this changes to Stef.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi Jan:
Perhaps this could help you.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
Pd: haven't never implemented one of this monsters.
NAME
red - Random Early Detection
SYNOPSIS
tc qdisc ... red limit bytes min bytes max bytes
avpkt bytes burst packets [ ecn ] [ band
--+--+
| QOS |
|EGRESS| <- controlled by tc
+---+--+
|
---+---
---
It was JFYI. I\'m not sure whether we can find a place in the
diagram for all programs in the world that are using NF hooks :) Of course,
you can go further and to build a jumbo picture of the NF world :)
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
_
ue and trying to complete the diagram.
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/Joseph.Mack/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO-19.html#ss19.21
4) Of course, diagram is ready to be shoot it off. Any comment, criticism,
etc,. is welcome.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
Have a look to this article I've taken from The Washington Post. Microsoft
is making some Lobbies
Hard Against Free Software. They deleted the article already but I took a
copy before.
http://opalsoft.net/qos/wpost/Washtech_com.htm
Best regards,
Leonardo.-
__
Hi Naim:
Check with "ps ax" if you have samba daemon running. Look for smbd and nmbd
servers.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
Naim wrote:
were too many connections attempt to my server at port 137 with UDP and
TCP, when I look into log files. In file /etc/services it says
netb
Hi Andreani,
I don´t think so. With 3 PCs you can set 3 routers but you also need some
client to complete your test. I walked through this way some time ago and I
really can´t create any useful scenario.
If you have better luck give a feed back.
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
>I want
Hi, Svavar :
I have set bonding and it works fine... but..
Before spending your money try to figure out first what your system
bottleneck is...
I purchased another NIC and installed bonding only to discovered that my
bottleneck was the hard disk's server.
Best regards,
Leonardo.-
___
Hi Andreani:
Nothing. Just some bad written and worst explained document out there in
the web.
I have an old html document about gated (routing daemon older than zebra:
rip, rip ii, ospf, isis, etc). If you want it e-mail me and I attached to
you. Also for protocol information try with cisco
erver; replace ppp0 and ppp1 with
eth0 and eth1. Also have a look to Alexey iproute2 because he says that
this command equalize load through the 2 NIC. Connect each NIC to each
incoming line using 2 different address space.
Give a feedback telling us your experiences.
Best regards,
Leonardo Ball
32 matches
Mail list logo