it's worse than that. we faced the same problems in china. an
oversubscribed adsl system. in fact there is more than one problem with
the public internet in these scenarios. the first as you have identified
is the lack of capacity. then you can't control the downstream routing -
eg traffic from
i know this will sound a bit flippant - it's not meant to be.
why not get rid of the cisco routers - i haven't found a need for them
yet.
my networks work much better without them ;)
rick
Ricardo Soria wrote:
Dear Chris:
Thanks for your sugestion. But my situation is really
more complicated
Andy Furniss wrote:
Ricardo Soria wrote:
1. So, starting at 80% of total 512kbit bandwidth
(410kbit), there would be a waste of 102kbit. Is this
completely necessary?? I think this is to ensure I
have the queue on my side, and the queue is not on the
side of the ISP. But, I fell tempted to thi
linux-linux using ip tunnels - modprobe ip_gre
eg
ip tunnel add china mode gre remote xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx local \
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ttl 255
ip link set china up
ip addr add 192.168.1.11 dev china
ip route add 192.168.5.0/24 dev china
ps - any hackers - don't bother - the firewalls will only accept
co
we have an external 2Mbit dsl connection and running on it are several
gre vpn tunnels
so far i've given priority to the vpn traffic (using htb)
can i now put rules in for the tunnels to control traffic within each
tunnel (that's where our video conferencing etc runs)? or can i only
control the r