Re: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-03-06 Thread Jody Shumaker
On 3/5/06, Andreas Hasenack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Em Qui 23 Fev 2006 20:41, Markus Schulz escreveu: > > you need a patch for NAT processing with multiple gateways. this will > > then save the routing information for each connection inside NAT > > structures, so that each packet of an establi

Re: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-03-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Em Qui 23 Fev 2006 20:41, Markus Schulz escreveu: > you need a patch for NAT processing with multiple gateways. this will > then save the routing information for each connection inside NAT > structures, so that each packet of an established connection will be > get routed over the same gateway. you

Re: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-02-27 Thread Sebastian Bork
On Fr, 2006-02-24 at 22:22 +0100, Sebastian Bork wrote: > Done. It happens here, too. But now it gets really strange: the data (I > tried scp) goes out on IF1 with IF2's source address. The ACK packets > come in on IF2. The connection works anyway ... *That's* what I'd call > really cool load-balan

Re: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-02-26 Thread Sebastian Bork
On Sa, 2006-02-25 at 00:23 +0530, Raj Mathur wrote: > > "Sebastian" == Sebastian Bork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sebastian> I use exactly the same setup with a customer's > Sebastian> conenction, the only difference: I use MASQUERADE > Sebastian> instead of SNAT. I did not see an

Re: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-02-24 Thread Raj Mathur
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Bork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sebastian> On Fr, 2006-02-24 at 00:44 +0530, Raj Mathur wrote: >> I have a client connected to the 'net through 3 ISP's. Have >> set up a Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 >> connections. A fourth in

Re: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-02-24 Thread Sebastian Bork
On Fr, 2006-02-24 at 00:44 +0530, Raj Mathur wrote: > I have a client connected to the 'net through 3 ISP's. Have set up a > Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A > fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. > Am using iptables to SNAT traffic

Re: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-02-23 Thread Markus Schulz
Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2006 20:14 schrieb Raj Mathur: > Hi, > > I have a client connected to the 'net through 3 ISP's. Have set up a > Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A > fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. > Am using iptables to

Re: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-02-23 Thread Nataniel Klug
Subject: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT > Hi, > > I have a client connected to the 'net through 3 ISP's. Have set up a > Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A > fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. &

Re: [LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-02-23 Thread Edmundo Carmona
That's because the route to a host X has been changed. There's a routing decision to host X every so or so minutes. Ways to handle that? Boy, that can be tough. I've read of prople who use a different LAN IP for every public connection. So If you have 3 public connections, you should use three dif

[LARTC] Balancing multiple connections and NAT

2006-02-23 Thread Raj Mathur
Hi, I have a client connected to the 'net through 3 ISP's. Have set up a Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. Am using iptables to SNAT traffic to the appropriate IP depending on the interface the pa