Re: [LARTC] Class C network 223.255.255.x

2006-04-14 Thread Erik Slagter
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:53 +0200, the sew wrote: Nothing wrong with the official, my backbone is expanding quite alot and we adding quite alot of businesses with cables in building, and we use pppoe and radus to asign ip addresses, just looking for a block of addresses that most companies

Re: [LARTC] Class C network 223.255.255.x

2006-04-13 Thread the sew
Nothing wrong with the official, my backbone is expanding quite alot and we adding quite alot of businesses with cables in building, and we use pppoe and radus to asign ip addresses, just looking for a block of addresses that most companies will never use. SewOn 4/12/06, Erik Slagter [EMAIL

[LARTC] Class C network 223.255.255.x

2006-04-12 Thread the sew
Hi, Most networks are using either 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x , but was curious If I can use the range 223.255.255.x for my backbone routing, this looks like a nice block to use as most ppl don't use this, specially if you build quite a big intranet what about the whole 223.x.x.x

Re: [LARTC] Class C network 223.255.255.x

2006-04-12 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:52 +0200, the sew wrote: Most networks are using either 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x , but was curious If I can use the range 223.255.255.x for my backbone routing, this looks like a nice block to use as most ppl don't use this, specially if you build quite a