On Sunday 04 November 2007 23:16, Fog_Watch wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:46:37 +
>
> Gustavo Homem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't use Shorewall, but rather an iptables script which works for
> > most scenarios:
>
> No disrespect, but that sounds too scary for me. I feel more
> comfor
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:46:37 +
Gustavo Homem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't use Shorewall, but rather an iptables script which works for
> most scenarios:
No disrespect, but that sounds too scary for me. I feel more
comfortable if something like Shorewall is holding my hand.
> That is, s
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:34:07 +0100
Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On dom, 2007-11-04 at 23:04 +1100, Fog_Watch wrote:
>
> > HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP.
>
> Is it? Any pointers?
I was going on gut instinct from vague information I read cruising
aroun
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
On dom, 2007-11-04 at 23:04 +1100, Fog_Watch wrote:
HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP.
Is it? Any pointers?
Well, it can decouple bandwidth and delay. And both are important here. Some
documentation pointers:
http://linux-ip.net/articles/h
On dom, 2007-11-04 at 23:04 +1100, Fog_Watch wrote:
> HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP.
Is it? Any pointers?
--
Giovanni Bajo
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/la
On Sunday 04 November 2007 12:04, Fog_Watch wrote:
> G'Day
>
> I would like to be able to use my VOIP telephone over a saturated
> ADSL link whilst enjoying optimum audio quality and utilising all of the
> bandwidth I pay for. It is about this situation that I write.
>
> HFSC appears to be the que
G'Day
I would like to be able to use my VOIP telephone over a saturated
ADSL link whilst enjoying optimum audio quality and utilising all of the
bandwidth I pay for. It is about this situation that I write.
HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. In order
for this to work
