Ehhh sorry , I wanted to ask: do you know .. ?
devik
On Wed, 29 May 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Julián Muńoz wrote:
> Yes, but will we understand ?? :-)
>
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
>
> > > > >
> > > > >So, the " --set-mark 0x10020" trick is not working in this case ??
> > > > >
>
Gasp,
Comparing my ingress with my egress config, I found I forget this:
tc filter add dev imq0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 fw
In the imq config, that's why it didn't work I suppose :-(
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
> > > >
> > > >So, the " --set-mark 0x10020" trick is not worki
Yes, but will we understand ?? :-)
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
> > > >
> > > >So, the " --set-mark 0x10020" trick is not working in this case ??
> > > >
> >
> >
> > Yes, it is the conclusion. With "tc filter" the packets go to the desired
> > queue, Devik's trick doesn't work in t
yes me :)
didn't get why???
C
Martin Devera wrote:
So, the " --set-mark 0x10020" trick is not working in this case ??
>>
>>Yes, it is the conclusion. With "tc filter" the packets go to the desired
>>queue, Devik's trick doesn't work in this case :-)
>>
>
> I'm interested here. D
> > >
> > >So, the " --set-mark 0x10020" trick is not working in this case ??
> > >
>
>
> Yes, it is the conclusion. With "tc filter" the packets go to the desired
> queue, Devik's trick doesn't work in this case :-)
I'm interested here. Do you want why didn't it work ?
devik
__
> >
> >So, the " --set-mark 0x10020" trick is not working in this case ??
> >
Yes, it is the conclusion. With "tc filter" the packets go to the desired
queue, Devik's trick doesn't work in this case :-)
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Julián Muñoz wrote:
>
> >I am marking inco
I am marking incoming packets this way:
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -j IMQ
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle --protocol tcp --destination 443 \
-j MARK --set-mark 0x10020
On the IMQ device I have a htb queue.
But all the traffic is put in the *default* htb queue, and not in t
