Hi!
I would like to invite you to visit MyDailyFlog and see my latest photos.
Check out: http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/gafty/45637618stc=16
Cheers!
Claudiu Gafton
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging space
Hi!
I would like to invite you to visit MyDailyFlog and see my latest photos.
Check out: http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/gafty/45637618stc=16
Cheers!
Claudiu Gafton
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging space
Hi!
I would like to invite you to visit MyDailyFlog and see my latest photos.
Check out: http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/gafty/45637618stc=16
Cheers!
Claudiu Gafton
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging space
Hi!
I would like to invite you to visit MyDailyFlog and see my latest photos.
Check out: http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/gafty/45637618stc=16
Cheers!
Claudiu Gafton
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging space
Hi!
I would like to invite you to visit MyDailyFlog and see my latest photos.
Check out: http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/gafty/45637618stc=16
Cheers!
Claudiu Gafton
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging space
Hi!
I would like to invite you to visit MyDailyFlog and see my latest photos.
Check out: http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/gafty/45637618stc=16
Cheers!
Claudiu Gafton
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging space
Hi!
I would like to invite you to visit MyDailyFlog and see my latest photos.
Check out: http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/gafty/45637618stc=16
Cheers!
Claudiu Gafton
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging space
Hi!
I would like to invite you to visit MyDailyFlog and see my latest photos.
Check out: http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/gafty/45637618stc=26
Cheers!
Claudiu Gafton
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging space
Hello again all,
Question:
I have a number of users, who need to be shaped at different rates. My
question is this:
Is there a way that I can shape both *inbound* and *outbound* traffic to
not exceed a single threshold, ie. they can get x kbps traffic in or x
kbps out, but no more than x kbps
yes, thanks for the idea, the reason i did not think of implementing this is that i
cannot see how it would help, the data has already passed the
bottleneck with no particular qos with regard to interactive sessions, which should
mean, if i did egress on the fws internal interface, that the
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 22:28, Tomas Bonnedahl wrote:
well, if tcp throttles down at the point where packets are dropped is of
course good, but still, when a download is peaking at the maximum speed
minus a couple kbits, the delay is terrible, that's what i want to change.
any idea?
You
ok, thanks, one question though, you mean that i should use regular ingress qos?
this could rise some problems since i want to shape both traffic entering at a
physical interface and traffic entering at a virtual
ipsec interface. do you have any experiance from this particular sitaution?
On Thursday 06 February 2003 17:29, Tomas Bonnedahl wrote:
ok, thanks, one question though, you mean that i should use regular
ingress qos?
this could rise some problems since i want to shape both traffic entering
at a physical interface and traffic entering at a virtual ipsec interface.
do
Stef,
Am I overlooking something obvious?
I'd suggest that Tomas throttles his bandwidth on transmit to the internal
network. It is a router, so very little traffic will be initiated from
the router itself.
Why not perform traffic control on packets transmitted to the Internet on
the outward
On Thursday 06 February 2003 17:49, Martin A. Brown wrote:
Stef,
Am I overlooking something obvious?
I'd suggest that Tomas throttles his bandwidth on transmit to the internal
network. It is a router, so very little traffic will be initiated from
the router itself.
Why not perform
: I'd suggest that Tomas throttles his bandwidth on transmit to the internal
: network. It is a router, so very little traffic will be initiated from
: the router itself.
: Why not perform traffic control on packets transmitted to the Internet on
: the outward facing NIC.
: Then
hm, the only way i see how to really get a hold on downloads is egress filtering on
the isp side.
ingress filtering here is just waste of time? partly because, what stef also said, the
data is already reveived, so i can get the same
effect with egress filtering on the internal interface of the
On Thursday 06 February 2003 18:11, Tomas Bonnedahl wrote:
hm, the only way i see how to really get a hold on downloads is egress
filtering on the isp side.
Even that's too late. The isp has no control on the data that people is
sending to you.
ingress filtering here is just waste of time?
i dont really see your reasoning here. of course my isp has no control of the data
that other people is sending me, but if the
sending party could do egress filtering on their nearest router on the path to reach
me, my isp should be able to do the same?
the difference between my isp doing
to get most out of qos in general, would the best thing be to set up qos on both ends
of a bottleneck with both ingress and egress
filtering? the reason for asking is because we have a 2mbit connection with egress
filtering qos, the problem is that we experience
most downloads compared to
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 16:44, Tomas Bonnedahl wrote:
to get most out of qos in general, would the best thing be to set up qos on
both ends of a bottleneck with both ingress and egress filtering? the
reason for asking is because we have a 2mbit connection with egress
filtering qos, the
well, if tcp throttles down at the point where packets are dropped is of course good,
but still, when a download is peaking at the maximum speed
minus a couple kbits, the delay is terrible, that's what i want to change. any idea?
regards,
tomas bonnedahl
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:13:27PM
From: CIT/Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any help would be greatly appreciated :) This is much better than SFQ :
Sounds like SFQ to me. Can you tell us what the differences are?
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don Cohen wrote:
From: CIT/Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any help would be greatly appreciated :) This is much better than SFQ :
Sounds like SFQ to me. Can you tell us what the differences are?
PRIO'd SFQ.
If you had classful PRIO with SFQ on each band, you'd probably have a
similar effect
24 matches
Mail list logo
