The author highly recommends disabling IRQ balancing in the kernel
config, but does not clarify what this does. I tried googling but
didn't find much info. What does it exactly do, and why is disabling
it recommended/required?
I haven't seen irq balance option in kernels for some time now.
Marek Kierdelewicz wrote:
I think you could do well with P4 3GHz HT. It would be cheapest and
most effective choice. With HT enabled kernel two nic-s could be
configured that each nic's interrupt is serviced by another
processor.
I recommend reading this article:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 09:05:42PM +0200, sAwAr wrote:
Hi
I would like to ask you which processor is beter solution for router? Please
shortly explain why?
I have about 800 users. For each I create 2 htb classes and 4 filters.
Moreower router have dhcp serwer and lots of iptables
sAwAr wrote:
I would like to ask you which processor is beter solution for router? Please
shortly explain why?
I'd like to add a question.
What Gigabit PCI-E NICs do people prefer for a server/router. What would
be the maximum bandwidth to expect between two Gigabit NICs connecting
two
Hi
Hi
I'm interested in P4 3Ghz HT and AMD Athlon 64 3000+. What is beter
choice for my needs? What parametrs of processors are important:
clock, cache, fsb or something else ?
I think you could do well with P4 3GHz HT. It would be cheapest and
most effective choice. With HT enabled kernel
Hi
I would like to ask you which processor is beter solution for router? Please
shortly explain why?
I have about 800 users. For each I create 2 htb classes and 4 filters.
Moreower router have dhcp serwer and lots of iptables rules.
I'm interested in P4 3Ghz HT and AMD Athlon 64 3000+.
