Hi,
has anyone contacted vger.kernel.org about lartc list creation?
Andrew Burgess wrote:
On 05/04/2011 07:10:01 PM, Russell Stuart wrote:
A list on vger.kernel.org does seem like a workable solution. Large a
third party provider such as google groups, yahoo groups, github,
sourceforge or sa
Hi
I sort of agree. This list just magically came back to life. Why? Did
someone flip a switch? Who is that person? Will they turn it off
again?
Also, regarding the site, its very static. I think a wiki could
replace it and breath some new life into it.
Adrian
2011/5/5 João Almeida :
> I just a
I just ask again, who is in charge now?
Why is the list awake again?
Not that I'm against a new list, but I propose four things:
1- Know what is going on!
2- Maintain this list for "compatibility" purposes
3- We can create a new one with a more easy address but keep them "tied
together" at least
On 05/04/2011 07:10:01 PM, Russell Stuart wrote:
A list on vger.kernel.org does seem like a workable solution. Large a
third party provider such as google groups, yahoo groups, github,
sourceforge or savanaha may be an even better solution as they would
be
just a reliable, and they provide a
+1
On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 11:10:01 pm Russell Stuart wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd
> > suggest that we give this list a week to a month probation to see if
> > it has straightened up it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Let's go for it then, count me in!
On 05/05/2011 05:10 AM, Russell Stuart wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
>> Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd
>> suggest that we give this list a week
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 12:10 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> A list on vger.kernel.org does seem like a workable solution.
>
> So who is in favour of doing this ASAP - like within the next few week
> or so?
+1
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.n
Yes, agree, affirmative, aye
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Russell Stuart
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
>> Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd
>> suggest that we give this list a week to a month probation to see if
>> it has str
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd
> suggest that we give this list a week to a month probation to see if
> it has straightened up it's act.I'd also like a comment from the list
> maintainer or a moderator in
+1
--Original Message--
From: Alex Samad
Sender: lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
ReplyTo: a...@samad.com.au
Subject: RE: [LARTC] List fault?
Sent: May 5, 2011 06:56
+1
-Original Message-
From: lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-boun
+1
-Original Message-
From: lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl] On
Behalf Of Russell Stuart
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2011 9:41 AM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] List fault?
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:24 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> All
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:24 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> All in favor?
>
> Any one against?
In favour.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:56 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:11 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
> > > True. We shall wait then for more information. On the other hand, I will
> > > try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote:
> > I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST).
> > Think we can get somebody else to join?
>
> I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self.
>
> However I think tha
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:11 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
> > True. We shall wait then for more information. On the other hand, I will
> > try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to take over
> > this one.
>
> I will say that this is the first
On 05/04/2011 10:15 PM, Ruben Rögels wrote:
> Am 04.05.2011 21:24, schrieb Grant Taylor:
>> On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
>>> I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
>>> take over this one.
>>
>> (I'll make this pitch again.)
>>
>> Does any one have any objection
> Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list so
> that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed back to
> the mailing list (as a discussion list)?
>
> All in favor?
>
> Any one against?
>From RFC2822 (my emphasis):
When the "Reply-To:" field is pre
Am 04.05.2011 21:24, schrieb Grant Taylor:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
so that it sets the Repl
On 05/04/2011 10:24 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
so that it sets the Re
Aye.
Greg
On 04 Μαϊ 2011, at 22:24 , Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
>> I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
>> take over this one.
>
> (I'll make this pitch again.)
>
> Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing
On 05/04/11 14:33, Radoslaw Horodniczy wrote:
How to unsubscribe from this spam list ?
The list may be (have been) broken, but it's not a source of spam.
( i cannot receive password from reminder)
That's odd.
If you are able to receive posts to the list, you should be able to
receive the
Agreed.
On 05/04/2011 10:24 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
so that it set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
In Favor...
Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
On 05/04/2011 12:24 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
>> I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
>> take over this one.
>
> (I'll make this pitch again.)
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:24 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
> > I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
> > take over this one.
>
> (I'll make this pitch again.)
>
> Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
Traffic Control"
Subject: Re: [LARTC] List fault?
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list so
that it se
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list so
that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed bac
going to have to agree... is nice to see however. =)
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:11 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
> > True. We shall wait then for more information. On the other hand, I will
> > try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to take ove
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
True. We shall wait then for more information. On the other hand, I will
try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to take over
this one.
I will say that this is the first time in approximately two years that
this mailing list has seemed to
I agree with Grant.
Greg.
On 04 Μαϊ 2011, at 21:06 , Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote:
>> I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST).
>> Think we can get somebody else to join?
>
> I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self.
>
> H
On 05/04/2011 09:06 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST).
Think we can get somebody else to join?
I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self.
However I think that this list (LARTC) is we
On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST).
Think we can get somebody else to join?
I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self.
However I think that this list (LARTC) is well known and documented all
over the place.
I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST). Think
we can get somebody else to join?
On 05/04/2011 08:02 PM, Brent Clark wrote:
On 04/05/2011 18:56, Radu Oprisan wrote:
Unfortunately, I think it all went to h*ll and back. I'll be more
than willing to create a new list un
On 04/05/2011 18:56, Radu Oprisan wrote:
Unfortunately, I think it all went to h*ll and back. I'll be more than
willing to create a new list under my own domain and we can start
discussing Linux routing once more. Anybody want me to do that?
Flip that would be awesome, and appreciated.
Linux r
Unfortunately, I think it all went to h*ll and back. I'll be more than
willing to create a new list under my own domain and we can start
discussing Linux routing once more. Anybody want me to do that?
On 05/04/2011 04:02 PM, João Almeida wrote:
Anyone managing the list can shed some light on t
Anyone managing the list can shed some light on the status of this list?
I for once wouldn't mind doing some moderation (if needed of course)...
2011/5/4 Kim Bak
> On 2011-05-04 05:43, Andreas Unterkircher wrote:
>
>> Same here, after having not received mails from this list for a long,
>> long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hehe,
must be my fault. I joined the list yesterday and have got nothing but
spam, old messages and comments on how broken the list is since ;-)
The web interface to mailman is painfully slow too.
Meanwhile I'll keep reading, maybe at some point th
The list is alive! :-D
On 5/4/2011 10:26 AM, Kim Bak wrote:
On 2011-05-04 05:43, Andreas Unterkircher wrote:
Same here, after having not received mails from this list for a long,
long time.
On 05/03/2011 11:52 PM, Don Gould wrote:
I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this list
On 2011-05-04 05:43, Andreas Unterkircher wrote:
Same here, after having not received mails from this list for a long,
long time.
On 05/03/2011 11:52 PM, Don Gould wrote:
I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this list.
Are others seeing same?
Yes, same here, I have not receiv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Same here...
On 05/04/2011 09:04 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:52 +1200, Don Gould wrote:
>> I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this list.
>>
>> Are others seeing same?
>>
>
> I've just had a load. Maybe they
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:52 +1200, Don Gould wrote:
> I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this list.
>
> Are others seeing same?
>
I've just had a load. Maybe they were a pile of messages that were held
for moderation and have just all been approved?
Would be nice to see some d
Same here, after having not received mails from this list for a long,
long time.
On 05/03/2011 11:52 PM, Don Gould wrote:
I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this list.
Are others seeing same?
D
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailma
I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this list.
Are others seeing same?
D
--
Don Gould
31 Acheson Ave
Mairehau
Christchurch, New Zealand
Ph: + 64 3 348 7235
Mobile: + 64 21 114 0699
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http:/
42 matches
Mail list logo
