On 10/22/07 15:50, Vaidas M wrote:
Thanks for your answer, this would help.
You are welcome.
I think I know how to block arp: -p ARP -j DROP something like that,
ant the broadcasts: --pkttype-type ...
Be careful blocking all ARP / broadcasts. Remember that equipment will
need to ARP to fi
On 10/20/07 06:23, Vaidas M wrote:
Hello to everyone,
Here is the situation:
[LAN1]---[eth3]/--\
| LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet]
[LAN2]---[eth4]\--/
Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24.
So I need:
LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other.
L
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:23:12 +0300
"Vaidas M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to everyone,
>
>
>
> Here is the situation:
>
> [LAN1]---[eth3]/--\
>
>| LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet]
>
> [LAN2]---[eth4]\--/
>
> Whole LAN is in subnet 10
Hello to everyone,
Here is the situation:
[LAN1]---[eth3]/--\
| LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet]
[LAN2]---[eth4]\--/
Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24.
So I need:
LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other.
LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same s
Thanks Marco.
Very useful your reply.
Roberto
2007/1/18, Marco Aurelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is not possible because ipp2p does not match every p2p packet but only
some essential signaling packets. By filtering these packets, the p2p client
cannot estabilish connections to transfer data,
This is not possible because ipp2p does not match every p2p packet but only
some essential signaling packets. By filtering these packets, the p2p client
cannot estabilish connections to transfer data, and that's how it filters
it.
Sometimes, ipp2p 'discovers' that this is a p2p related connection
Hi all !!!
I have a firewall bridge (not router) with two nics that filter p2p with ipp2p.
All works fine but now I need to add a third nic to route all p2p traffic
through this nic.
It is that possible with a bridge ?
Later (with other server) connect to this nic I do loading balancin
Hello,
I’ve setuped HFSC QOS using as this script
http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/
I've a bridge with eth0 and eth1 inside br0
I haven't use ebtables, just iptables. I neeed to have different
value on upload and download this why I've setuped QOS on 2 interfaces
I
Hello,
I've got somes questions about Bridge and QOS ...
I've got a serveur with 2 interfaces eth0,eth1 inside br0 bridge ...
nothing of special ...
If I understand all, normally I should configure TC class and qdisc on
each physical or use ebtables to manage packets on output ... right ?
I'v
On 11/13/06, Net Cerebrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to configure a device with three network interfaces where two of them
would bridge two segments of the LAN subnet and the third one would be
connected to the WAN link.
eth0 - 10.10.10.2/24 to be connected to the internet gateway having
I want to configure a device with three network interfaces where two of them would bridge two segments of the LAN subnet and the third one would be connected to the WAN link.eth0 - 10.10.10.2/24
to be connected to the internet gateway having IP 10.10.10.1/24 (also the default gateway for the devic
I recently upgraded my gateway to a pIII 600 with a zyxel 4 port nic
(tulip) and bridge eth0 and eth1, eth0 is a crossover cable to my PC
eth1 a switch.
I don't have ifconfig on this box (LFS) and couldn't find any examples
of bridging using ip - maybe this is relevant maybe not - I've tried a
fe
Hi I am using traffic shaping on br0 and working
nicely. Only problem is when I nat off br0 with a third nic I run into
the following problems when traffic shaping:
Wondering if anyone has had success with the following
layout???
__br0(eth0,eth1)-e
hi everybody.
i have a bridge, and i want to apply QoS with htb and layer7 on both
interfaces(eth0 and eth1), should i apply qdiscs and classes to each
individual interface (eth0 and eth1, not br0)?
if someone is using layer7, which is the right place to put the iptables
rules to assure tha
Hi.
I am trying to bend my brain around 'tc' and friends and am failing so far.
I need to set up a bridge which limits the packet rate to 2000 packets/s, but
with the added
twist that packets with a certain DSCP value must be given absolute priority in
both directions.
The packet rate limit thi
> I posted out on this problem some time ago and could never get 2.4.25 or
> any 2.6 kernel to work with TC + Bridging. If anyone has this working
> and has actually tested it (I am actually just doing IP based iptables
> filtering from my bridge interface) please let us know what version of
>
Roy Walker wrote:
I posted out on this problem some time ago and could never get 2.4.25 or any 2.6 kernel to work with TC + Bridging. If anyone has this working and has actually tested it (I am actually just doing IP based iptables filtering from my bridge interface) please let us know what versi
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Bridge + TC
Hi,
> I have also tried that. I'm using 2.6.3-mm3 -> packets don't seem to
> Perhaps the key here is 2.4. I might have to revert...
There was a change with kernel 2.6.0 for incoming and outgoing interfaces of
a bridge device (at lea
Hi,
> I have also tried that. I'm using 2.6.3-mm3 -> packets don't seem to
> Perhaps the key here is 2.4. I might have to revert...
There was a change with kernel 2.6.0 for incoming and outgoing interfaces of
a bridge device (at least for iptables - that's why I'm guessing it also
affects ebtable
Jeroen Vriesman wrote:
So I would suggest testing:
1) no filter rule for 1:10 which is default
This shouldn't affect things in the end though, correct? (I.e. it's
overkill, but it won't hurt anything, right?)
(I've also had it pass by default through the 1:1, in which case nothing
passed th
Hi,
I've got an almost simular setup, which is working fine.
something I noticed:
You say everything is going into class 1:10, which is both your default AND you got a
filter for it <-??
I also see that your "default filter" has handle 1, in my setup the handles of the
filters are unique.
For
I'm hoping someone can provide a little input that might help me out a
little...
I've recently tried to setup a 3-interface transparent bridge, where 2
internal interfaces (eth1,eth2) funnel into 1 outgoing interface (eth0).
The idea was to be that eth1 gets priority over eth2 in all cases.
Th
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 4:15 pm, Wouter Coppens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't get traffic shaping working.
>
> This is my situation:
>
>
> --
> Net1 - |router| | TC | --- Net2
> leased line
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 17:15, Wouter Coppens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't get traffic shaping working.
>
> This is my situation:
>
>
> --
> Net1 - |router| | TC | --- Net2
> leased line ---
Hi,
I can't get traffic shaping working.
This is my situation:
--
Net1 - |router| | TC | --- Net2
leased line --
eth1eth0
We'll need a lot more information to help you... Why do you say the
bridge is working? What DOES work? What is the configuration of your
bridge?
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 03:35, Victor wrote:
> I belive I missed something
>
>| br0 |
> test --|eth0 eth1 |- network
I belive I missed something
| br0 |
test --|eth0 eth1 |- network
ftp|tc |
If I ping a machine from "network" from the "test ftp" she doen't answers.
If I skip the bridge, and I put the "test ftp" in the "network", the ping
is working.
I have n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a question here, i am wondering if changing my setup. I have a linux firewall
doing QoS and load balancing with 3 ethernets.
I have to DSL connections running at 2Mbit each. So, i was wondering, can i change
this setup to set up to bri
Hi:
I would like to know how can i bridge traffic between
2 lans over the internet, if posible i prefer to do
this using kernel features instead of userspace app
of course encryption is desirable but not a most since
i can set iptables rules to limit traffic
thanks in advance for any comment or
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of hare ram
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LARTC] Bridge+QOS
Hi all
iam setting up a bridge with QOS Services
i would like to you to have coments on setup, is this works
i ahve
On Monday 17 March 2003 08:04, hare ram wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
> iam setting up a bridge with QOS Services
>
> i would like to you to have coments on setup, is this works
>
> i ahve setup like this
>
> LAN--eth1(Bridge)eth0--router--Internet
>
>
> in LAN i have users 10 people
> i would like to have Q
Hi all
iam setting up a bridge with QOS Services
i would like to you to have coments on setup, is this works
i ahve setup like this
LAN--eth1(Bridge)eth0--router--Internet
in LAN i have users 10 people
i would like to have QOS Services for 5 people burstable
5 People commited ( bounded b/w w
I have some remakst to make.
You can't use iptables on a linux bridge. (I think there is a patch that you
can, but I'm not sure). And try to patch the kernel for htb (it's a
replacement for cbq). And maybe you can try to filter on mac-address so you
don't need to know the ip-addresses.
Stef
I'm about to set up a Linux bridge (kernel 2.4.18.x from Redhat 7.3)
between a (future) cable modem and several machines in the house. Some
of those machines are windows, mine is Linux (but dual boots to
windows). Basically:
CABLE_MODEM (DHCP issues to each machine)
|
|(eth0 --
> I think I caused unnecessary alarm. There was actually
> a network cable connecting my router and hub behind the linux
> box that does the shaping, duh :-) I forgot to pull it out once I
> move some servers around causing very little traffic to go through
> the box doing the shaping.
:)
> Thi
Hi Stef
I think I caused unnecessary alarm. There was actually
a network cable connecting my router and hub behind the linux
box that does the shaping, duh :-) I forgot to pull it out once I
move some servers around causing very little traffic to go through
the box doing the shaping.
On Mon,
does not HTB only shape on outgoing traffic? unless you start doing some
ingress queues?
- Original Message -
From: "Stef Coene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Roché Compaan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 5:54 AM
Su
> If I understand correctly I can shape incoming traffic by setting
> up a qdisc on eth0 and filters that match any of the ip addresses
> in my public subnet sitting behind the linux box that currently does
> the traffic shaping.
But all traffic coming on eth0 is leaving eht1 and vice versa. So s
> what kinda bridge are you using?
> bridge-nf? if you are it says it only supports iptables, you would have to
> mark the packets then use filter to put the marked packets into
> teh correct
> queue for managing
Yes I'm using bridge-nf, but as far as I understand bridge-nf
doesn't require ipta
To: "Stef Coene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 10:27 PM
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Bridge with Traffic shaping
> On Saturday 27 July 2002 19:56, Roché Compaan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am fairly new to routing and traffic cont
> On Saturday 27 July 2002 19:56, Roché Compaan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am fairly new to routing and traffic control but I with the
> > help of the lartc howto I managed to setup a bridge with htb
> > traffic control. The traffic shapping does not seem to work
> > as I expected and I would real
On Saturday 27 July 2002 19:56, Roché Compaan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am fairly new to routing and traffic control but I with the
> help of the lartc howto I managed to setup a bridge with htb
> traffic control. The traffic shapping does not seem to work
> as I expected and I would really appreciate i
Hi,
I am fairly new to routing and traffic control but I with the
help of the lartc howto I managed to setup a bridge with htb
traffic control. The traffic shapping does not seem to work
as I expected and I would really appreciate if somebody
can tell my why this is the case.
My setup:
I have a
Okay, right now I have: (this may be really bad ascii)
dsl
|(eth0)
router
|(eth1)
---hub---
/\
hpnabridge ethernet hub
| | | | | |
computers computers
(hpna cards)(ethernet cards)
I have hpna drivers working great for linux, s
44 matches
Mail list logo
