On Wed, 15 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:11:09 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Martin Devera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Catalin BOIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change
>
> > > :) You c
> > :) You can drop & recreate it safely. User will
> > not see it. The change function for SFQ will be
> > probably considered "redundant" by other kernel
> > developers because of it.
>
> But you loose counters! This is bad IMHO.
That's good point ! So that go ahead and implement it for
SFQ :)
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:24:54PM +0300, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
> But you loose counters! This is bad IMHO.
If you know when you're dropping it, the counter loss is not relevant;
resetting to zero is easy to compensate for, and rrdtool (for example)
has
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 14:15:36 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Martin Devera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Catalin BOIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change
>
> :) You can drop &
:) You can drop & recreate it safely. User will
not see it. The change function for SFQ will be
probably considered "redundant" by other kernel
developers because of it.
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > OK.
> > > But for SFQ?
> >
> > what do you want to change in sfq !!??
> perturb
> I wish you good luck!
> HTB deserves to be in the main kernel tree.
Thanks :)
> > Do you need it ? And why ?
> Yes, I need it.
> I need to change on the fly r2q to see how the traffic flow changes.
> But I don't want to delete the whole tree just to change some parameters
> on the root class.
> > OK.
> > But for SFQ?
>
> what do you want to change in sfq !!??
perturb and quantum on-the-fly.
> devik
---
Catalin(ux) BOIE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~catab
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mai
e:
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 12:29:00 +0200 (CEST)
> > > From: Martin Devera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: Catalin BOIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change
> > >
>
> OK.
> But for SFQ?
what do you want to change in sfq !!??
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
ra wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 12:29:00 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Martin Devera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Catalin BOIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change
> >
> > Because there is nothing
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 12:29:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Martin Devera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Catalin BOIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change
>
> Because there is no
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 12:29:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Martin Devera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Catalin BOIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change
>
> Because there is no
12 matches
Mail list logo
