I'm trying to limit bandwidth consumption of sites hosted behind a squid
working as a reverse transparent proxy (squid 2.5.3 with Patrick McHardy
tcp_outgoing_priority patch) but with traffic levels for a given site of
1Mbps, only about 1% of the traffic shows up in a tc -s -d.
Anyone has exp
Martin Devera wrote:
>>Martin Devera wrote:
>>
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 10:43, you wrote:
>I've seen patch to squid somewhere. The trick is to encode original
>requester information into new request packets. It can go into
>"priority" field - it is 32bit and is userspace-
> Martin Devera wrote:
> >>On Wednesday 22 May 2002 10:43, you wrote:
> >>
> >>>I've seen patch to squid somewhere. The trick is to encode original
> >>>requester information into new request packets. It can go into
> >>>"priority" field - it is 32bit and is userspace-settable.
>
> In Squid 2.5 yo
Martin Devera wrote:
>>On Wednesday 22 May 2002 10:43, you wrote:
>>
>>>I've seen patch to squid somewhere. The trick is to encode original
>>>requester information into new request packets. It can go into
>>>"priority" field - it is 32bit and is userspace-settable.
In Squid 2.5 you have the poss
> On Wednesday 22 May 2002 10:43, you wrote:
> > I've seen patch to squid somewhere. The trick is to encode original
> > requester information into new request packets. It can go into
> > "priority" field - it is 32bit and is userspace-settable.
>
> That sounds exactly like the solution I've been
Andreas Lehrbaum wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 May 2002 10:43, you wrote:
>
>>I've seen patch to squid somewhere. The trick is to encode original
>>requester information into new request packets. It can go into
>>"priority" field - it is 32bit and is userspace-settable.
>
>
> That sounds exactly lik
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 10:43, you wrote:
> I've seen patch to squid somewhere. The trick is to encode original
> requester information into new request packets. It can go into
> "priority" field - it is 32bit and is userspace-settable.
That sounds exactly like the solution I've been looking for
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gavin White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] squid + tc
>
>
> On Wednesday 22 May 2002 09:00, Gavin White wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I h
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] squid + tc
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 09:00, Gavin White wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some htb rules set up to govern download speeds through a linux
box,
> depending on the IP address of the destination machine.
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 09:00, Gavin White wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some htb rules set up to govern download speeds through a linux box,
> depending on the IP address of the destination machine.
>
> My problem is that when the end users choose to use my squid cache, which
> sits before the htb
Hello,
I have some htb rules set up to govern download speeds through a linux box,
depending on the IP address of the destination machine.
My problem is that when the end users choose to use my squid cache, which
sits before the htb machine (and has to be there), the htb machine thinks
the traff
11 matches
Mail list logo