Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-26 Thread sophana
what about using a sip proxy? I'm not sure, but the rtp traffic goes though the sip proxy does it? then you can prioritize traffic with the sip proxy process user id (assuming that you can have a proxy on your router) I have a much more basic question: I installed a qos script based on

Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-26 Thread Suresh Babu
I think RTP traffic doesn`t flow through SIP proxy. Only SIP packets flows through SIP proxy and RTP traffic flows end to end.correct me if i`m not.Regards,Suresh Babu On 4/26/06, sophana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what about using a sip proxy?I'm not sure, but the rtp traffic goes though the sip

Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-26 Thread sophana
Suresh Babu wrote: I think RTP traffic doesn`t flow through SIP proxy. Only SIP packets flows through SIP proxy and RTP traffic flows end to end. correct me if i`m not. would it depend on the kind of sip proxy? I thought that one of the sip proxy functions was to resolve rtp NAT problems.

Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-26 Thread Marius Corici
the RTP traffic does not go through the SIP Proxy. Some solutions to control the voice traffic exist. One is RTP Proxy which communicates with a SER (SIP Express Router) or OpenSER and does as stated in the name, proxying for RTP. As a side efect the outbound ports are known. SIP Proxies do more

Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-24 Thread chentschel
Hi, Why don\'t just use \--helper sip\ extension in IPTABLES with ip_conntrack_sip loaded. That would see, and track RTP trafic in the machine. Please, if you do send me feed about the module. Thanks. CH. Mensaje citado por: Marius Corici [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why not just prioritize

RE: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-24 Thread LinuXKiD
This post is from Samuel Garcia. (thank you ) - - I tried it with kernel 2.6.15.x and many pom-ng patches and those modules - (conntrack and nat) hangs up the system. - - I don't recommend it, at least for now over 2.6.x kernel series. - - Regards - - - Hi, - Why don\'t just use

RE: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-24 Thread chentschel
Hi, well there\'s a line to change in ip_conntrack_sip.c. The \'hangup\' if because the ip_ct_refresh() function. That\'s documented BTW in the netfilter list. I\'m sorry don\'t have the time to submit a patch to the netfilter svn. I\'ll try to do it. Cheers. Christian Hentschel Mensaje

Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-21 Thread Marius Corici
About SIP: the traffic does not jump at a random port, it is another type of traffic that you see afterwards, it's the RTP stream. SIP is used only for signaling a session hence the name Session Initiation Protocol. The SIP messages contain the IP Address + Port where the RTP flow will appear. The

RE: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-21 Thread LinuXKiD
Abril de 2006 11:19 p.m. - Para: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl - Asunto: Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic - - - L7 filter works very well too: - http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ - - Although I didn't try it with sip, I use it to control my P2P and server - applications and have a very usable ADSL link at almost 100

RE: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-21 Thread LinuXKiD
- About SIP: the traffic does not jump at a random port, it is - another type of traffic that you see afterwards, it's the RTP stream. OK!, Thank you. I understand. - SIP is used only for signaling a session hence the name Session - Initiation Protocol. The SIP messages contain the IP

Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-20 Thread Francisco
L7 filter works very well too: http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ Although I didn't try it with sip, I use it to control my P2P and server applications and have a very usable ADSL link at almost 100% utilization of my upstream. El Martes, 18 de Abril de 2006 07:45, LinuXKiD escribió: mmm...

Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-20 Thread Jason Boxman
On Thursday 20 April 2006 22:19, Francisco wrote: L7 filter works very well too: http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ Although I didn't try it with sip, I use it to control my P2P and server applications and have a very usable ADSL link at almost 100% utilization of my upstream. Does any of

RE: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-18 Thread William Bohannan
Hi I am pretty much a newbie, I found with sip if I match ports 5060 and 1 - 2 it works I noticed on some phones the use 13000 - 14000 and others use 18000 - 19000. there is a new sip-contrack out although I haven't tried it yet. william -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-18 Thread LinuXKiD
mmm... intresting http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_iptables ip_conntrack_sip Someone has tried it ? works on 2.4 kernel series ? thanks - - - Hi I am pretty much a newbie, I found with sip if I match ports 5060 and - 1 - 2 it works I noticed on some

RE: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

2006-04-18 Thread chentschel
Mensaje citado por: LinuXKiD [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mmm... intresting :) indeed.. Someone has tried it ? I suppose, i have received very goog feedback about it. works on 2.4 kernel series ? Only 2.6.11. (rusty newnat api) BTW, using the \helper\ extension in IPTABLES is possible to