what about using a sip proxy?
I'm not sure, but the rtp traffic goes though the sip proxy does it?
then you can prioritize traffic with the sip proxy process user id
(assuming that you can have a proxy on your router)
I have a much more basic question:
I installed a qos script based on
I think RTP traffic doesn`t flow through SIP proxy. Only SIP packets flows through SIP proxy and RTP traffic flows end to end.correct me if i`m not.Regards,Suresh Babu
On 4/26/06, sophana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what about using a sip proxy?I'm not sure, but the rtp traffic goes though the sip
Suresh Babu wrote:
I think RTP traffic doesn`t flow through SIP proxy. Only SIP packets
flows through SIP proxy and RTP traffic flows end to end.
correct me if i`m not.
would it depend on the kind of sip proxy?
I thought that one of the sip proxy functions was to resolve rtp NAT
problems.
the RTP traffic does not go through the SIP Proxy. Some solutions to control the voice traffic exist.
One is RTP Proxy which communicates with a SER (SIP Express Router) or
OpenSER and does as stated in the name, proxying for RTP. As a side
efect the outbound ports are known.
SIP Proxies do more
Hi,
Why don\'t just use \--helper sip\ extension in IPTABLES with
ip_conntrack_sip loaded. That would see, and track RTP trafic in the machine.
Please, if you do send me feed about the module.
Thanks.
CH.
Mensaje citado por: Marius Corici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why not just prioritize
This post is from Samuel Garcia. (thank you )
-
- I tried it with kernel 2.6.15.x and many pom-ng patches and those modules
- (conntrack and nat) hangs up the system.
-
- I don't recommend it, at least for now over 2.6.x kernel series.
-
- Regards
-
-
- Hi,
- Why don\'t just use
Hi, well there\'s a line to change in ip_conntrack_sip.c. The \'hangup\' if
because the ip_ct_refresh() function.
That\'s documented BTW in the netfilter list. I\'m sorry don\'t have the time
to submit a patch to the netfilter svn. I\'ll try to do it.
Cheers.
Christian Hentschel
Mensaje
About SIP: the traffic does not jump at a random port, it is another
type of traffic that you see afterwards, it's the RTP stream.
SIP is used only for signaling a session hence the name Session
Initiation Protocol. The SIP messages contain the IP Address + Port
where the RTP flow will appear. The
Abril de 2006 11:19 p.m.
- Para: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
- Asunto: Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic
-
-
- L7 filter works very well too:
- http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
-
- Although I didn't try it with sip, I use it to control my P2P and server
- applications and have a very usable ADSL link at almost 100
- About SIP: the traffic does not jump at a random port, it is
- another type of traffic that you see afterwards, it's the RTP stream.
OK!, Thank you. I understand.
- SIP is used only for signaling a session hence the name Session
- Initiation Protocol. The SIP messages contain the IP
L7 filter works very well too:
http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
Although I didn't try it with sip, I use it to control my P2P and server
applications and have a very usable ADSL link at almost 100% utilization of
my upstream.
El Martes, 18 de Abril de 2006 07:45, LinuXKiD escribió:
mmm...
On Thursday 20 April 2006 22:19, Francisco wrote:
L7 filter works very well too:
http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
Although I didn't try it with sip, I use it to control my P2P and server
applications and have a very usable ADSL link at almost 100% utilization of
my upstream.
Does any of
Hi I am pretty much a newbie, I found with sip if I match ports 5060 and
1 - 2 it works I noticed on some phones the use 13000 - 14000 and
others use 18000 - 19000. there is a new sip-contrack out although I
haven't tried it yet.
william
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
mmm... intresting
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_iptables
ip_conntrack_sip
Someone has tried it ?
works on 2.4 kernel series ?
thanks
-
-
- Hi I am pretty much a newbie, I found with sip if I match ports 5060 and
- 1 - 2 it works I noticed on some
Mensaje citado por: LinuXKiD [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mmm... intresting
:) indeed..
Someone has tried it ?
I suppose, i have received very goog feedback about it.
works on 2.4 kernel series ?
Only 2.6.11. (rusty newnat api)
BTW, using the \helper\ extension in IPTABLES is possible to
15 matches
Mail list logo