John, thanks for your response.
I did not intend to start a long discussion questioning the list policy.
IMHO the official policy of allowing short product/company notices has
worked well in the past to everybody's benefit.
Considering how carefully I've controlled access to this email address a
Dear list,
I recently received a full-blown advertisement (SPAM) from a company that
uses THIS LIST to gather email addresses. The sender is a member of the
list: John Toto at Superlogics.
I don't at all mind members peddling their products in direct response to
questions posted to the list (as
Jim,
I got it this time around. Neat. Thanks.
Tore
At 13:27 5/27/2004, you wrote:
Tore,
If you are running on an RT Target, then the reentrant approach is better
than the template technique, IMO. The reason is because of a "catch 22" --
you cannot create an instance of a template while the templat
and it also causes it to be
transferred to the RT execution target when you run your app in development
mode. If you reference your spawned VI by path and it is not loaded into
memory, then it will not be uploaded to the RT execution target when running
in development/debug mode.
Cheers,
-Jim Kri
directly to my email address)
TIA,
Tore
-------
Tore Johnsen
Saint Bernard Engineering, Inc.
Phone: 651-494-9073
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.saintbernardengineering.com/
