I could only work from the data you supplied, so I looked at the
graph. What you post, more often than not, determines who and how good
the answer is.
I still think that the damping of your measurement system will be
critical to effective and accurate measurement as well.
Check out the following
1)=09Yes, you are right. It isn=92t undersampled really, but
reviewing the block diagram in my improvised Write Loggin VI , I have
found that the =93raw=94 signal was averaged too (300 samples) and I
recorded it as is. This is an answer for your item 3} too.
2)=09Sync pulses have different amplit
How did you progress ?
My initial reaction to looking at the data is
1) It is undersampled
2) Why are the synce pulses different amplitudes
3) The raw data contains little or no information
It appears, although not clear from your comment, that there was an
existing system which weighed the trays. If this is the
Looks like this might get lost, so I hope to help get it going
I would imagine that the most difficult part would be getting the
mechanical engineering / handling correct.
1) Is this your own mechanics ?
2) How are you managing damping of the system?
i.e. When the tray 'hits' the loa