RE: Re (2) : appbuilder

2004-04-20 Thread Rolf Kalbermatter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Forum LabView > i agree that building a cross compiler wouldn't be so easy to > do and not a profitable option > But having to pay for a whole development system is really > expensive as > you already bought it for another platform > > why not just selling an application buil

Re: Re (2) : appbuilder

2004-04-20 Thread Infos - Bien Entendu
i agree that building a cross compiler wouldn't be so easy to do and not a profitable option But having to pay for a whole development system is really expensive as you already bought it for another platform why not just selling an application builder as vi are able to migrate between platforms (o

Re (2) : appbuilder

2004-04-20 Thread Rolf Kalbermatter
"Infos - Bien Entendu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >this is really unfair from national as VIs can migrate from one platform >to another and embedding VIs in multiples "standalone engine" (one for >each platform) should be quite easy to do. Well it has economical as well as technical reasons. First integ

Re (2) : appbuilder

2004-04-20 Thread Infos - Bien Entendu
>> for exemple i develop on a mac OSX with LV7 an application builder >> what do i need to make it run on windows ? >> > >This ability isn't really there today. EXEs on various Windows are >compatible with one another, but Mac and unix have different binary >standards. To compile one from the

Re: Re (2) : appbuilder

2004-04-15 Thread Craig Graham
Infos - Bien Entendu wrote: > this is really unfair from national as VIs can migrate from one > platform to another > and embedding VIs in multiples "standalone engine" (one for each > platform) should be quite easy to do. VIs migrate, like other programs, only if they have the source code. Remov