"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Attaway Kathy! (Attaway Bill too, come to think of it). But Kathy - a
big welcome, keep posting... :) LDMF.
William J. Foristal wrote:-
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. For
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi - you have me really laughing! I didn't know about this Martian one,
the one I read was somepeople from Upper, Lower, and Mid-Somewhere. I
have one question and another answer and to tell you the truth I don't
k
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Steve - I am not up on my vampire lore, but from the summary that
Kathy posted I would say with that confidence he could do a lot of
things! It's tragic that he murdered. But if they had said he did it the
vampire way,
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sue - yes - its amazing to me that we must have been reading the phrase
you have posted here at the same time, and I stumbled over it before I
went on reading. I didn't know what to say about it; glad you posted
it.
Now
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In this recent Supreme Court case it was held that voluntary appearance
at clemency meeting did not violate an inmates constitutional rights.
Posted below is a passage from an abstract of the case. Posted here
for its s
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jackie, Sue - hi - a question: what is the deal with so-called "truth
serum?" Is that sodium pentathol? Not sure. But isn't there an injection
(usually) that so relaxes a person that the tongue goes wag wag
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue - yes, but possibly instead of "knowing" something, they must
have probable (probabilistic) cause to believe a crime has been comitted
and the subject committed it (or the subject might be endangering the
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue - I think we had better bring our expert in on this one. And he
is a California lad also. Calling Ed, Calling Ed...! from a general
perspective though, and not having read anything about the case except
what's he
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue: Oh no. I must have given you the wrong impression. I guess I
should have used some smilies or grins. But the short answer is No, he
didn't think he was a vampire. And the reason that he didn't think
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue, I think you've hit on what might help, a midway replacement
(please correct and/or elaborate) for prison-psychiatric-wards and
psychiatric-hospital criminal-wards. I don't know about the funding, but
special
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:) Echo your feelings, Kathy -- which is why I posted the 'OTOH'. It's
such a strong if melodramatic move to accuse someone else, not a missing
person suspect, but an actual located and presented person (ha, inde
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sue - thanks for posting this advance notice; Ed probably knows a good
deal sbout this, but its always fascinated me, what is required for
probable' cause or reasonable suspicion' for police to search a car. I
g
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
;) ;) ;) Oh yes Kathy, please do look in your large database of
'Vampire' cases and post a summary. (No, really, I was watching some of
this trial too, the perp was giving a good verbal lesson on becoming a
vampire
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Suer - this is certainly a difficult issue. Concurrently 'sick and
criminal' (an individual factor, a social factor -- though that's too
simplistic a distinction) which should be treated? I understand pri
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kathy, this 'triangulation' to third party 'virtual-suspect' seems
designer-designed for "reasonable doubt." OTOH who knows. It will be
interesting to see how this works out.
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue - this seems a very touching situation; one hopes someone will
review it while there is still time to do so. I know the arguments for
proceeding are many because all the intertwining laws and sub-texts add
up to exe
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill - this goes way way way back, but I recall that in describing
the "omniscient" intelligence (knows all, sees all "objectively"), Henry
James posited a "shoulder fly" that just perches th
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
doncha love it doncha love it (breathe here) doncha love it doncha?!?!?!
- Sue Hartigan wrote:
>It's very easy to sling mud, the problem
>is make sure your tossing it
"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greetings all - Kathy has kindly shared this link to an Opinion which
explores consitutional, 4th amendment issues (whether search and seizure
was, in context, legal and admissible) in a case involving pornography,
disk files o
"Dr. LDMF [Ph.D., J.D.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greetings all - this is a new post located by Sue and retrieved for us
by Kathy; I leave it for a future lister to snip. However, I have
selected as a quote a summary paragraph, and attach 2 questions:
"Dr. LDMF [Ph.D., J.D.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thanks Bill; actually had cabbage and corned beef, carrots,
potato.:)LDMF
-William J. Foristal wrote:, inter alia:-
>May the leprechauns be near you to spread luck along your way. And
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
