Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A woman convicted of brutally murdering an elderly man is joining a
handful of women on death row in Texas.
Brittany Marlowe Holberg was sentenced Friday night to death by lethal
injection following her March 13 capital murder conviction in the death
of A.B.
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie:
Someone on one of those Sunday News shows said that the WH and everyone
on the "hill" keep right up on those polls that are published. I'm sure
that they are all aware of the publics feelings about Clinton.
I honestly don't think it will
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Sue
I just can't help but wonder if Congress stays in tune with the public at all
sometimes. Now they have allocated more money for this mess. I just shake my
head.
jackief
Sue Hartigan wrote:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill
My server has finally decided that it will let me in. Oh well, I had a lot
to do anyway so maybe that was good. But, I didn't like not knowing what
was happening on the list.
Will have to get up to date with the new cases that I just seen on
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill
I think you have really hit on one important thing that many forget when we
hear each person's story of what occurred. Usually, it is not an either/or
thing, but the truth lies somewhere in-between. I guess what I mean here is
that it is not
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill
You know I can't help but wonder why the producers of 60 Minutes didn't ask
themselves why Willey was so willing to come on the program and tell her
devastating tale? I know I would wonder after she was previously a reluctant
witness. This
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie :) My replies are below :)
Jackie Fellows wrote:
Here comes the ole' devil's advocate here.
Isn't it fun doing that at times? LOL
Question: if Willey was so concerned about her husband's whereabouts, why
was she making an appointment to see the
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you all still need me to do a summary of the show or not? Just let me
know and I'll do one up if you need me to :)
Sue Hartigan wrote:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Dr. L.:
I'm not too good at doing that, but maybe we could get Kathy to
"Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Direct exam: What if anything did you want Kathy to do?
Opposition counsel: objection, leading.
Witness: I wanted (as to state of mind) a summary from Kathy.
Cross Exam: Isn't it true you wanted Kathy to do a summary?
Opposition Counsel:
"Dr. L. [Ph.d., J.D.]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...Which is why you are just a swell person, not an attorney also *YET*
Sue Hartigan wrote:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Dr. L.:
All I answered was "Yes", "Please". LOL
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a feeling that it will be a long, long educational period for me
to even resemble an attorney. Of course it won't be for the lack of a
great teacher. :)
Dr. L. [Ph.d., J.D.] wrote:
...Which is why you are just a swell person, not an attorney
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Kathy:
Would you please? Thanks
Sue
Do you all still need me to do a summary of the show or not? Just let me
know and I'll do one up if you need me to :)
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Well now we know a possible motive for Willey. Apparently she has a book
deal in the works. Guess she gave up on Clinton finding her a job and
decided this might be an easier way for her to get out of debt. If the
book deal is a
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh man I'm LMAO! Thanks for that Linda :) The summary is in another
message :)
Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff wrote:
"Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Direct exam: What if anything did you want Kathy to do?
Opposition counsel: objection, leading.
"Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi - I missed it; could you sum up the 60 minutes program along with
which of the several women were interviewed? Thanks a lot, ") LDMF.
Sue Hartigan wrote:---
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Dr. L.:
I would have bet on it too. Until I saw that interview tonight on 60
Minutes. :( Did you see it? That woman is really very convincing.
Sue
Hi Sue - Betcha a marzipan bar (my favorite, I surf the web for them)
that: his ratings will go
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Dr. L.:
I'm not too good at doing that, but maybe we could get Kathy to do it.
She is wonderful when it comes to those sorts of things.
I was impressed with this woman. I still haven't taken her word as
being the absolute truth, but I can't discount
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They just announced on CNBC that yet another woman has come forward with
yet more allegations against Clinton. She is appearing before the grand
jury tomorrow or Tuesday.
When in the world did this man have time to do his governor and
president jobs.
"Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Sue - Betcha a marzipan bar (my favorite, I surf the web for them)
that: his ratings will go up. :) LDMF.
-Sue Hartigan wrote:---
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They just announced
19 matches
Mail list logo
