Re: [Lazarus] Watches/Local variables/Registers [Re: IDE UI consolidation (was: Re: lfm as pascal)]

2009-05-07 Thread Martin Friebe
Alexander Klenin wrote: On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 08:56, Martin Friebe laza...@mfriebe.de wrote: To heat the discussion up: From the wiki: Watches/Local variables/Registers All three are a lists of name/value pairs used at debug time. They should be merged together in a single

Re: [Lazarus] Watches/Local variables/Registers [Re: IDE UI consolidation (was: Re: lfm as pascal)]

2009-05-07 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 20:55, Martin Friebe laza...@mfriebe.de wrote: They should be merged together in a single list with appropriate filtering capabilities. another thing with combining them, is that the amount of Locals keeps changing (watches just display unavailable). This means

[Lazarus] Watches/Local variables/Registers [Re: IDE UI consolidation (was: Re: lfm as pascal)]

2009-05-06 Thread Martin Friebe
To heat the discussion up: From the wiki: Watches/Local variables/Registers All three are a lists of name/value pairs used at debug time. They should be merged together in a single list with appropriate filtering capabilities. That would make debugging so much harder. Let's assume

Re: [Lazarus] Watches/Local variables/Registers [Re: IDE UI consolidation (was: Re: lfm as pascal)]

2009-05-06 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 08:56, Martin Friebe laza...@mfriebe.de wrote: To heat the discussion up:  From the wiki:     Watches/Local variables/Registers All three are a lists of name/value pairs used at debug time. They should be merged together in a single list with appropriate filtering