Re: [Lazarus] Why Laz2_DOM, laz2_XMLRead, and laz2_XMLWrite?

2017-09-20 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:38:23 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: >[...] > Currently not, I think. > All the more reason to move everything to FCL in a unified codebase. +1 > Or use your suggestion and use something like > > Type > {$IFDEF

Re: [Lazarus] Why Laz2_DOM, laz2_XMLRead, and laz2_XMLWrite?

2017-09-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt

Re: [Lazarus] Why Laz2_DOM, laz2_XMLRead, and laz2_XMLWrite?

2017-09-20 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus >> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [Lazarus] Why Laz2_DOM, laz2_XMLRead, and laz2_XMLWrite?

2017-09-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: These units work using UTF8. The DOM units use UnicodeString (UTF16). Given that these units are quite stable in terms

Re: [Lazarus] Why Laz2_DOM, laz2_XMLRead, and laz2_XMLWrite?

2017-09-20 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: > > These units work using UTF8. The DOM units use UnicodeString (UTF16). > > Given that these units are quite stable in terms of functionality and > maturity, it may be a good idea to move

Re: [Lazarus] Why Laz2_DOM, laz2_XMLRead, and laz2_XMLWrite?

2017-09-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: Hi, Nowadays we have Unicode and so on. Is there any reason to these units (Laz2_DOM, laz2_XMLRead, and laz2_XMLWrite) still exists? I've always used them, but days ago I needed to use XPath and the xpath unit works using

[Lazarus] Why Laz2_DOM, laz2_XMLRead, and laz2_XMLWrite?

2017-09-20 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
Hi, Nowadays we have Unicode and so on. Is there any reason to these units (Laz2_DOM, laz2_XMLRead, and laz2_XMLWrite) still exists? I've always used them, but days ago I needed to use XPath and the xpath unit works using objects from DOM unit, not laz2_DOM, and because that my doubt. Best