[Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi, Our company projects requires a flexible and easy to use setup program to work on various Linux distros as well as Windows. Mac support will probably come in a year or two, because currently our applications are only available on Linux and Windows, so that is the platforms we are focusing on.

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi, * Notification of hard drive space available and how much will be used by selected features. * different internal archive options: gzip, lzma, zip, tar.gz etc... This might prove difficult. on linux, only .tar.gz is guaranteed to be

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Paul Ishenin
20.01.2010 15:06, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: We are primarily targeting deployment of Free Pascal based applications, but the setup engine should be flexible enough to handle any type of application (we hope). :) We will probably release the setup and setup builder as Open Source software once

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: * different internal archive options: gzip, lzma, zip, tar.gz etc... This might prove difficult. on linux, only .tar.gz is guaranteed to be supported. If you want any of the others, you'll have to deploy the uncompression engine as well. Do don't plan on relying

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: So what feature do you require in a setup that we did not think of? What's your wish list? What I also forgot to mention are a few more features. * Splash/Banner/Logo image support. If no image is available, the setup GUI window adjust itself accordingly. *

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Paul Ishenin wrote: My wish list - port innosetup (http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php) which is written in delphi and is opensource project. We are using it for lazarus windows installs. I know about inno setup, but never used it before. We didn't want to port something because we wanted

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Vladimir Zhirov
Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote: Anyway, I would like to know what features your guys (as developers) would like to see in a setup program. I can think of the one additional feature: * Checking dependencies. There is no such problem in fpGUI apps since the only dependency is X

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Vladimir Zhirov wrote: * Checking dependencies. There is no such problem in fpGUI apps since the only dependency is X :) But Lazarus apps can be stuck to specific GTK/QT version(s). That is exactly why the setup program is written with fpGUI. So even tiny lite linux distros or even embedded

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Vladimir Zhirov wrote: The clients we are targeting are all newcomers to Linux. They are used to Windows with simply double clicking a setup.exe file. This is our goal for Linux to - no opening of command prompts and typing (unless you are an

Re: [Lazarus] contnrs.ppu - Invalid Version 112

2010-01-20 Thread Kjow
2010/1/19 Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl: This happens only once or twice an year. I manually kill the fpc\$FPCVERSION\units\ dir if I notice it. A different reason to do the same is strange errors like linker errors, or wanting to recompile. This can happen because an unit switched

Re: [Lazarus] Build/Rebuild lazarus with components

2010-01-20 Thread Kjow
2010/1/19 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de: make bigide compiles an IDE as found in the windows installer. To compile an IDE with your current set of installed packages, use lazbuild --build-ide= After an svn update, it is better to do: make clean all lazbuild --build-all

[Lazarus] vga dependency

2010-01-20 Thread tim launchbury
Hello all I am learning free pascal / lazarus by porting a delphi application at work to lazarus on linux ( Mandriva 2010 ). So far I have got it to compile but when I tried to run it it complained about a missing lvga dependency. I installed libvga and now the message is that /dev/mem is not

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Vladimir Zhirov
Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Vladimir Zhirov wrote: The clients we are targeting are all newcomers to Linux. They are used to Windows with simply double clicking a setup.exe file. This is our goal for Linux to -

Re: [Lazarus] vga dependency

2010-01-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, tim launchbury wrote: Hello all I am learning free pascal / lazarus by porting a delphi application at work to lazarus on linux ( Mandriva 2010 ). So far I have got it to compile but when I tried to run it it complained about a missing lvga dependency. I installed

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Vladimir Zhirov
Sorry, I got my mails messed up, so here is the missing part: Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: I want to double click, then click next, next and finish - and be done with it. :) Well, then one more feature request :) * Automated install procedure. It could be a command line option to take a

Re: [Lazarus] vga dependency

2010-01-20 Thread tim launchbury
Hello all I am learning free pascal / lazarus by porting a delphi application at work to lazarus on linux ( Mandriva 2010 ). So far I have got it to compile but when I tried to run it it complained about a missing lvga dependency. I installed libvga and now the message is that /dev/mem is

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Vladimir Zhirov wrote: * Automated install procedure. It could be a command line option to take a text/xml/ini file with setup options and do not require user to press any buttons or type filesystem paths. Yes we are considering the usual /silent or --silent parameter option, and a option

[Lazarus] PropEdits.TGetStringProc duplicated Classes. TGetStrProc

2010-01-20 Thread Alexander Klenin
From PropEditUtils.pas (recently split by me from PropEditS.pp): TGetStringProc = procedure(const s:ansistring) of object; From Classes.pp: TGetStrProc = procedure(const S: string) of object; I think TGetStringProc is redundant and should be removed. Should I prepare a patch? -- Alexander S.

Re: [Lazarus] PropEdits.TGetStringProc duplicated Classes. TGetStrProc

2010-01-20 Thread Mattias Gärtner
Zitat von Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com: From PropEditUtils.pas (recently split by me from PropEditS.pp): Every change to the IDEIntf must be documented here: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_0.9.30_release_notes TGetStringProc = procedure(const s:ansistring) of object;

Re: [Lazarus] PropEdits.TGetStringProc duplicated Classes. TGetStrProc

2010-01-20 Thread Alexander Klenin
2010/1/20 Mattias Gärtner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de: Zitat von Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com: From PropEditUtils.pas (recently split by me from PropEditS.pp): Every change to the IDEIntf must be documented here: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_0.9.30_release_notes Done.

Re: [Lazarus] PropEdits.TGetStringProc duplicated Classes. TGetStrProc

2010-01-20 Thread Mattias Gärtner
Zitat von Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com: 2010/1/20 Mattias Gärtner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de: Zitat von Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com: From PropEditUtils.pas (recently split by me from PropEditS.pp): Every change to the IDEIntf must be documented here:

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Juha Manninen
Graeme, I am sorry to tell you but your project is doomed to failure with the requirements you listed. In the end you will have a system that almost works, or works in 85% of the cases, and you will be frustrated yourself. Your idea is not new. Other people have banged their heads to wall as

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Support for user languages and countries. That comes standard with all fpGUI applications. Currently we have translations for 8 languages (af, de, en, es, fr, it, pt, ru). Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread stoppok
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:49:29AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: [...Inno Setup...] I know about inno setup, but never used it before. We didn't want to port something because we wanted to think out-of-the-box and build it from the ground up with cross-platform support in mind. Trying to

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Juha Manninen wrote: I am sorry to tell you but your project is doomed to failure with the requirements you listed. With that attitude, ALL developers would be out of business and we wouldn't have things like Linux, OpenOffice or any open source projects for that matter. :-) I gather your

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
stop...@muenster.de wrote: I'd recommend to use the same syntax as inno-setup. By that you mean the *.iss file? eg: lazarus/tools/install/win/lazarus.iss * fully documented :-) Our setup.xml is already full documented (yeah, programmers that document. WTF??) and the elements used are

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Juha Manninen
Hi! * we use recommended *.desktop and *.directory files for menu items Do you mean there is a standard way for that for all window managers? Ok then, I didn't know. There are tens of different window managers around. Does RPM support dependency checks? Last time I used RedHat (years ago)

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote: Does RPM support dependency checks? Last time I used RedHat (years ago) it did not. RPM surely always did support dependency checks. Some packages have different names across distributions, which ruins the

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Juha Manninen wrote: * we use recommended *.desktop and *.directory files for menu items Do you mean there is a standard way for that for all window managers? Ok then, I didn't know. There are tens of different window managers around. Yes, there is a standard. Most (still active in

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: RPM surely always did support dependency checks. Some packages have Not in the days I used RedHat. I'm talking long ago, from Redhat 5.0 to about 8.1. :-) I've just been spoilt with Ubuntu. I guess it's time I start trying out other distros again. Slackware

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:25:58 +0200 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote: Juha Manninen wrote: * we use recommended *.desktop and *.directory files for menu items Do you mean there is a standard way for that for all window managers? Ok then, I didn't know. There are tens

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread stoppok
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:41:48PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: stop...@muenster.de wrote: I'd recommend to use the same syntax as inno-setup. By that you mean the *.iss file? eg: lazarus/tools/install/win/lazarus.iss Exactly. * fully documented :-) Our setup.xml is

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Phil Hess
- Vincent Snijders vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl wrote: But from the maintainer of fpgui which doesn't use an existing, familiar to the user widget set, another way (one kind of installer that runs on all systems, but does not match an existing packaging system) does not surprise me

Re: [Lazarus] Application.QueueAsyncCall()

2010-01-20 Thread cobines
2010/1/20 Brad Campbell b...@wasp.net.au: Is QueueAsyncCall() threadsafe? As far as I know it is not. Let's say I have a communications child thread and I want to trigger a call back in the main GUI thread. Traditionally I'd do something ugly like have a timer polling a variable used as a

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread stoppok
Please stop this flamewar, nobody is forced to use Graemes code. His only intention was to get some feedback and tell us about his ideas, thats how OSS works. bye, Stefan -- Absender:

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
stop...@muenster.de escreveu: Please stop this flamewar, nobody is forced to use Graemes code. His only intention was to get some feedback and tell us about his ideas, thats how OSS works. + 1 Keep going Graeme ! Luiz -- ___ Lazarus mailing

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06:55AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: already implemented or at least went through the brain storming and design idea phase. Here is our requirements and ideas we came up with: * Linux distro independent setup. Against the normal methods, we do not want to

Re: [Lazarus] PropEdits.TGetStringProc duplicated Classes. TGetStrProc

2010-01-20 Thread waldo kitty
On 1/20/2010 06:12, Alexander Klenin wrote: From PropEditUtils.pas (recently split by me from PropEditS.pp): TGetStringProc = procedure(const s:ansistring) of object; From Classes.pp: TGetStrProc = procedure(const S: string) of object; I think TGetStringProc is redundant and should be

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 20/01/2010, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: There seems to be a misunderstanding. Both deb and rpm have package dependency resolution, but neither downloads them automatically. You must use tools like apt-get for debs and yum for rpms or even Ah, so the RPM guys were

Re: [Lazarus] PropEdits.TGetStringProc duplicated Classes. TGetStrProc

2010-01-20 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:30:55 -0500 waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net wrote: On 1/20/2010 06:12, Alexander Klenin wrote: From PropEditUtils.pas (recently split by me from PropEditS.pp): TGetStringProc = procedure(const s:ansistring) of object; From Classes.pp: TGetStrProc =

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 20/01/2010, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe you used it in the wrong way. The rpm utility doesn't solve the dependencies, it's like the dpkg utility from Debian. Thanks. Mattias explained that I had a misunderstanding of how things work.

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Phil Hess
- stop...@muenster.de wrote: Please stop this flamewar, nobody is forced to use Graemes code. His only intention was to get some feedback and tell us about his ideas, thats how OSS works. Another way OSS works is that you're not our mommy. Okay, here's some feedback: Use a

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 20/01/2010, stop...@muenster.de stop...@muenster.de wrote: OK, I thought you are still in the early stages of evaluation. No, we have had the setup tool on the table for some time, we just did have time to implement everything yet. That's my task now. Concerning XML: From my point of

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 20/01/2010, Vincent Snijders vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl wrote: It is editable in the text editor. But also by IS-Tool, which is more like an IDE for inno setup scripts. I took a second look at the lazarus.iss file to see how install features/options and there relationships are mapped in the

[Lazarus] Error: illegal qualifier [ found

2010-01-20 Thread Kjow
Hi, I updated Lazarus svn to revision 23510, but from some revs (at least from some hours ago), when I press ctrl+space at the end of an array to open the menu I get the error: Error: illegal qualifier [ found Is it a bug or a my problem? Thanks, Kjow --

Re: [Lazarus] Error: illegal qualifier [ found

2010-01-20 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:33:32 +0100 Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I updated Lazarus svn to revision 23510, but from some revs (at least from some hours ago), when I press ctrl+space at the end of an array to open the menu I get the error: Error: illegal qualifier [ found Is it

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 20/01/2010, Vincent Snijders vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl wrote: To bad, the ideal setup creator would get a setup.xml and compile it to .rpm, .deb, windows installer, .dmg with Mac OS X package, etc. Kind of like the Lazarus idea, one source for many OS/widget set combinations. Good

Re: [Lazarus] Error: illegal qualifier [ found

2010-01-20 Thread Kjow
2010/1/20 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de: Can you give a more complete example? Mattias e.g. If I add to a form a listview or a memo or a combobox and in the source code I put this: ListBox1.items[0]. or Memo1.Lines[0]. or combobox1.items[0]. If I press CRTL+Space I got this

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 20/01/2010, stop...@muenster.de stop...@muenster.de wrote: Please stop this flamewar, nobody is forced to use Graemes code. Thanks Stefan. I always take what Vincent says with a pinch of salt. We have some understanding that everything goes except on Fridays, and I think I saw a smiley face

Re: [Lazarus] Error: illegal qualifier [ found

2010-01-20 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:02:19 +0100 Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/1/20 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de: Can you give a more complete example? Mattias e.g. If I add to a form a listview or a memo or a combobox and in the source code I put this: ListBox1.items[0].

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:56:06 +0200 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote: On 20/01/2010, Vincent Snijders vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl wrote: To bad, the ideal setup creator would get a setup.xml and compile it to .rpm, .deb, windows installer, .dmg with Mac OS X package, etc.

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 20/01/2010, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote: (it might be wise to check out in how far these named programs are shared linked) True, those mentioned (and ones like ATI and Nvida drivers) tend to be more on the commercial side of things. But then again, our company products are

[Lazarus] Can't compile Lazarus from latest svn

2010-01-20 Thread Žilvinas Ledas
Hello all, I get error: Compiling E:\lazarus\packager\frames\compiler_buildvar_options.pas Compiling .\frames\compiler_conditionals_options.pas compiler_conditionals_options.pas(28,47) Fatal: Circular unit reference between compiler_conditionals_options and Compiler_BuildVar_Options Fatal:

Re: [Lazarus] Can't compile Lazarus from latest svn

2010-01-20 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:25:10 +0200 Žilvinas Ledas zilvinas.le...@dict.lt wrote: Hello all, I get error: Compiling E:\lazarus\packager\frames\compiler_buildvar_options.pas Compiling .\frames\compiler_conditionals_options.pas compiler_conditionals_options.pas(28,47) Fatal: Circular unit

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 20/01/2010, Jonathan wrote: The is no frame work under Windows for the menu, just files thats why you have silly company's listing there program under there name. I haven't looked at that code in a while, but our old Delphi programs created there own icons. I can't remember if it was

Re: [Lazarus] Can't compile Lazarus from latest svn

2010-01-20 Thread Žilvinas Ledas
Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:25:10 +0200 Žilvinas Ledas zilvinas.le...@dict.lt wrote: Hello all, I get error: Compiling E:\lazarus\packager\frames\compiler_buildvar_options.pas Compiling .\frames\compiler_conditionals_options.pas compiler_conditionals_options.pas(28,47)

Re: [Lazarus] Application.QueueAsyncCall()

2010-01-20 Thread Brad Campbell
cobines wrote: 2010/1/20 Brad Campbell b...@wasp.net.au: Is QueueAsyncCall() threadsafe? As far as I know it is not. Let's say I have a communications child thread and I want to trigger a call back in the main GUI thread. Traditionally I'd do something ugly like have a timer polling a

Re: [Lazarus] Can't compile Lazarus from latest svn

2010-01-20 Thread Žilvinas Ledas
Žilvinas Ledas wrote: Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:25:10 +0200 Žilvinas Ledas zilvinas.le...@dict.lt wrote: Hello all, I get error: Compiling E:\lazarus\packager\frames\compiler_buildvar_options.pas Compiling .\frames\compiler_conditionals_options.pas

Re: [Lazarus] PropEdits.TGetStringProc duplicated Classes. TGetStrProc

2010-01-20 Thread waldo kitty
On 1/20/2010 16:55, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:30:55 -0500 waldo kittywkitt...@windstream.net wrote: On 1/20/2010 06:12, Alexander Klenin wrote: From PropEditUtils.pas (recently split by me from PropEditS.pp): TGetStringProc = procedure(const s:ansistring) of object;

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread waldo kitty
On 1/20/2010 17:15, Phil Hess wrote: - stop...@muenster.de wrote: Please stop this flamewar, nobody is forced to use Graemes code. His only intention was to get some feedback and tell us about his ideas, thats how OSS works. Another way OSS works is that you're not our mommy. and

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread waldo kitty
On 1/20/2010 17:18, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 20/01/2010, stop...@muenster.destop...@muenster.de wrote: OK, I thought you are still in the early stages of evaluation. No, we have had the setup tool on the table for some time, we just did have time to implement everything yet. That's my

Re: [Lazarus] Application.QueueAsyncCall()

2010-01-20 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Brad Campbell b...@wasp.net.au wrote: Is QueueAsyncCall() threadsafe? In Delphi the queued method is run on the (context of) the main/GUI thread. -Flávio -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Phil Hess
- waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net wrote: Another way OSS works is that you're not our mommy. and the other way around... we're not your mommy, either... the main thing to remember about OSS is there is no :( in OSS ;) Waldo, I have no idea what that means. Hope it's

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Paul Ishenin
21.01.2010 8:06, Phil Hess wrote: Part of this is probably related to the evolution of Lazarus more and more into the best tool for developing Linux apps (which is great) but maybe less and less the best tool for other platforms. And sure, that's no problem either, if that's the direction

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Phil Hess
- Paul Ishenin i...@kmiac.ru wrote: 21.01.2010 8:06, Phil Hess wrote: Part of this is probably related to the evolution of Lazarus more and more into the best tool for developing Linux apps (which is great) but maybe less and less the best tool for other platforms. And sure, that's

Re: [Lazarus] Application.QueueAsyncCall()

2010-01-20 Thread cobines
2010/1/21 Brad Campbell b...@wasp.net.au: Yeah, but what I'm trying to do is have the main gui thread sit on its hands until it has a message waiting for it. Then I'd like to have it wakeup on an event rather than spinning or polling, while still remaining responsive to user input. Polling is

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread George Lober
Phil Hess wrote: - waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net wrote: Another way OSS works is that you're not our mommy. and the other way around... we're not your mommy, either... the main thing to remember about OSS is there is no :( in OSS ;) Waldo, I have no idea what

Re: [Lazarus] Application.QueueAsyncCall()

2010-01-20 Thread waldo kitty
On 1/20/2010 21:01, cobines wrote: If you're not worried about your worker thread pausing from time to time to update the GUI, then using Synchronize is prefferable. as in how much time?? is this a standard setting or something related to all other processing?? --

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread waldo kitty
On 1/20/2010 20:06, Phil Hess wrote: - waldo kittywkitt...@windstream.net wrote: Another way OSS works is that you're not our mommy. and the other way around... we're not your mommy, either... the main thing to remember about OSS is there is no :( in OSS ;) Waldo, I have no idea

Re: [Lazarus] Application.QueueAsyncCall()

2010-01-20 Thread cobines
2010/1/21 waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net: On 1/20/2010 21:01, cobines wrote: If you're not worried about your worker thread pausing from time to time to update the GUI, then using Synchronize is prefferable. as in how much time?? is this a standard setting or something related to all

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Vincent Snijders
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef: On 20/01/2010, Vincent Snijders vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl wrote: It is editable in the text editor. But also by IS-Tool, which is more like an IDE for inno setup scripts. I took a second look at the lazarus.iss file to see how install features/options and there

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Mattias Gaertner wrote: * have other customization options during the install. Not easily at least. I have seen a handful of .deb packages that prompt for a Yes/No question, but that's about it. Most prompted in a console window (ugly) and one or two prompted in a GTK2 dialog

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Phil Hess wrote: - LCL with Qt widgetset (if you don't mind the overhead: OOP LCL -- OOP widgetset -- non-OOP QtIntf library -- OOP Qt (C++) -- Cocoa). All of these are acceptable native solutions, Very interesting Phil. You have no problems with Qt and even call it native, yet fpGUI

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Phil Hess wrote: Many of the ideas expressed here seem to start with Linux and end with Linux. Probably because Linux is becoming a more attractive platform than all others for desktop applications. Also maybe because Lazarus IDE is simply the best tool for the job - hands down! So live with

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installati on - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread zeljko
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 21:29, Marco van de Voort wrote: Do you plan to support windowmaker? A lot of packages do this wrong under Windowmaker. Just because WMaker is not freedesktop compliant ? ;) z. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
George Lober wrote: that is easy to use by the average joe computer user whatever the platform is. It is an idea to cater to the end user and the software developer, and not some OSS or other status quo. Considering what the task is, it is understandable a large focus is on the Linux

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
zeljko wrote: Just because WMaker is not freedesktop compliant ? ;) And judging by the progress in recent years, a dead product. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ --

Re: [Lazarus] cross-distro (and OS) app installation - what would you like?

2010-01-20 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
waldo kitty wrote: s/did have/did not have/ ?? Correct. :-) I was typing while being half asleep. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ -- ___ Lazarus mailing