Op 2011-01-09 20:24, Hans-Peter Diettrich het geskryf:
> Where do you see problems?
> The determination of a closer target (e.g. control) is up to the
> application or library, that manages the layout of a window. Every
> application or library can freely define their own "handles" for every
12.01.2011 18:09, tim launchbury пишет:
Hello all
I am trying to implement printing in my app and want to use the
printdialog included with lazarus. I have dropped the print dialog on
the form and set it to appear when a button is clicked.
When the printdialog.execute function is executed an ex
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 17:26 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Reverting to Linux and trying to build with fpGUI from inside the LCL, I
> get stuck at
>
> fpguiint.pp(42,12) Fatal: Can't find unit fpg_main used by fpguiint
>
> Symlinks (3x) appear OK- have I missed something obvious like a prebui
Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 12 January 2011 15:13, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 03:47 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 12:46 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
I believe postmessage works in gtk2 now.
I did a test and it does not seem o work for me, while
Application.QueueAsyncCall(), tha
On 12 January 2011 15:13, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 03:47 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
>>
>> On 01/12/2011 12:46 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe postmessage works in gtk2 now.
>>>
>> I did a test and it does not seem o work for me, while
>> Application.QueueAsyncCall(), that
Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 12 January 2011 19:40, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Henry Vermaak wrote:
Graeme (or anybody): is it possible to build Lazarus+fpGUI completely
from source, i.e. without having a working Lazarus as described at
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/fpGUI_Interface
You won't b
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 19:40 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
So if I did that and also make lazbuild I might possibly get somewhere
on Solaris 10 despite missing libraries which appear to preclude
building the IDE.
On a side note:
I have never tested "pure" fpGUI on
On 12.01.2011, 20:23 Frank Church wrote:
> Is there a preprocessor value that can be set in the IDE for debugging?
> eg.
> ifdef XX
> showmessage('y')
> endif,
> I am interested in options that can be ticked in the IDE dialogs rather than
> typed.
I think Build Modes in the curren
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 19:40 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> So if I did that and also make lazbuild I might possibly get somewhere
> on Solaris 10 despite missing libraries which appear to preclude
> building the IDE.
On a side note:
I have never tested "pure" fpGUI on a Solaris system. If S
On 12 January 2011 19:40, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> Henry Vermaak wrote:
>
>>> Graeme (or anybody): is it possible to build Lazarus+fpGUI completely
>>> from source, i.e. without having a working Lazarus as described at
>>> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/fpGUI_Interface
>>
>> You won't be abl
Henry Vermaak wrote:
Graeme (or anybody): is it possible to build Lazarus+fpGUI completely
from source, i.e. without having a working Lazarus as described at
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/fpGUI_Interface
You won't be able to compile lazarus itself using fpgui, but you can
certainly compi
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 15:41 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Graeme (or anybody): is it possible to build Lazarus+fpGUI completely
> from source,
No, you can't build Lazarus IDE with LCL-fpGUI yet. As Michael said,
there are still way to many unimplemented functions or components in
LCL-fpGUI. H
Is there a preprocessor value that can be set in the IDE for debugging?
eg.
ifdef XX
showmessage('y')
endif,
I am interested in options that can be ticked in the IDE dialogs rather than
typed.
--
Frank Church
===
http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
--
___
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 12.01.2011 18:24, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>>
>> Marcos Douglas hat am 12. Januar 2011 um 18:05
>> geschrieben:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Andreas Schneider
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > ... which you can already do. The unit orde
On 12.01.2011 19:57, Sven Barth wrote:
On 12.01.2011 16:18, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 04:04 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13120
Supposedly this introduces the problem with TThread.Synchronize.
Would it not be possible / more appropriate to implem
On 12.01.2011 16:18, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 04:04 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13120
Supposedly this introduces the problem with TThread.Synchronize.
Would it not be possible / more appropriate to implement PostMessage(),
TThread.Synchronize,
On 12.01.2011 18:24, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Marcos Douglas hat am 12. Januar 2011 um 18:05 geschrieben:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> >
> > ... which you can already do. The unit order in the uses clause
> > already determines which identifier is chosen whe
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:00:51 -0300
> Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>> 2011/1/12 Mattias Gaertner :
>> >> But I can register a component called TButton?
>> >
>> > No, that would conflict with the LCL TButton. See the FCL function
>> > FindClass.
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 05:04 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Looks like I will be dead and burnt before that happens.
(in which case I will care little one way or the other - luckily)
I did many days of research on that issue once when we (company) really
intended to use FPC/Laza
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:00:51 -0300
Marcos Douglas wrote:
> 2011/1/12 Mattias Gaertner :
> >> But I can register a component called TButton?
> >
> > No, that would conflict with the LCL TButton. See the FCL function
> > FindClass.
>
> I know.
>
> >> Because that I proposed the Lazarus put the un
2011/1/12 Mattias Gaertner :
>> But I can register a component called TButton?
>
> No, that would conflict with the LCL TButton. See the FCL function
> FindClass.
I know.
>> Because that I proposed the Lazarus put the unit name in the code,
>> automatic...
> Just use the right unit order.
What i
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
a:= d(c, c)
end;
What does a(2, 3) return?
Then we'll have to implement many variations of such a template,
otherwise the bots can handle single cases easily.
Very true, but by the time the template has been expanded with different
variable/function names and
michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-12 14:15, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
I see. So I need to find the docs how to do a "pure" fpGUI project.
Take a look at any of the demos in the 'examples' directory. They ar
Marcos Douglas hat am 12. Januar 2011 um 18:05 geschrieben:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> >
> > ... which you can already do. The unit order in the uses clause
> > already determines which identifier is chosen when you do *not*
> > specify a u
Marcos Douglas schrieb:
And if we can "rename", in the code, the names of the units then it
would be perfect, IMHO.
Like this:
uses
CompanyXYZ_StdCtrls as xyzctrls;
That looks a bit like Modula to me.
I do not know Modula. This is good, in Modula?!
http://en.wikipedia.org/
Sven Barth schrieb:
When namespaces correspond to unit names, i.e. disk files, a
disambiguation is always possible by adding the parent directory to the
unit name. This is not implemented, because there never existed an
urgent need for such an extension, but it would always end up in unique
refe
Mark Morgan Lloyd schrieb:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
How about a Capcha that was a coding problem?
Some users do not speak english very well, so they may not understand
the problem that we are trying to express.
But they s
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Jürgen Hestermann
wrote:
>
>
> Marcos Douglas schrieb:
>>
>> And if we can "rename", in the code, the names of the units then it
>> would be perfect, IMHO.
>> Like this:
>> uses
>> CompanyXYZ_StdCtrls as xyzctrls;
>>
>>
>
> That looks a bit like Modula to me.
I d
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> ... which you can already do. The unit order in the uses clause
> already determines which identifier is chosen when you do *not*
> specify a unit explicitly. So just make sure that LCL's TButton is
> always the defa
Hello Lazarus-List,
Wednesday, January 12, 2011, 4:49:35 PM, you wrote:
>> Graeme (or anybody): is it possible to build Lazarus+fpGUI completely from
>> source, i.e. without having a working Lazarus as described at
>> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/fpGUI_Interface
mvwb> I don't think so: LCL
Marcos Douglas schrieb:
And if we can "rename", in the code, the names of the units then it
would be perfect, IMHO.
Like this:
uses
CompanyXYZ_StdCtrls as xyzctrls;
That looks a bit like Modula to me.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.
On 12.01.2011, 17:48 Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 21:09, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
>>> wrote:
Duplicate identifiers are used in the same unit in very rare ca
On 12/01/11 16:36, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 05:14 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
I just tested again here, and using postmessage with gtk2 from an
external thread (from a library) works perfectly.
As taken from some example code, I just created a user thread with
TMyThread.create(). It d
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 21:09, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
>> wrote:
>>> Duplicate identifiers are used in the same unit in very rare cases only, so
>>> that normally a qualification is
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 05:04 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Looks like I will be dead and burnt before that happens.
(in which case I will care little one way or the other - luckily)
I did many days of research on that issue once when we (company) really
On 01/12/2011 05:14 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
Have you built your project with -dusecthreads?
I found ho to set this in the Lazarus IDE (and verified that this does
work),
But no call to the message handler nonetheless.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus maili
On 01/12/2011 05:14 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
I just tested again here, and using postmessage with gtk2 from an
external thread (from a library) works perfectly.
As taken from some example code, I just created a user thread with
TMyThread.create(). It does run and does
while not Terminated
On 12/01/11 15:48, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-12 17:13, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
TThread.Synchronize seems to work fine with fpGUI, but with gtk2 I only
see events when I (e.g.) move the move around on Form.
@Michael van
On 01/12/2011 05:04 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Looks like I will be dead and burnt before that happens.
(in which case I will care little one way or the other - luckily)
I did many days of research on that issue once when we (company) really
intended to use FPC/Lazarus in an embedded desig
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 21:09, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
> wrote:
>> Duplicate identifiers are used in the same unit in very rare cases only, so
>> that normally a qualification is not necessary at all.
>
> Rare cases because I can't use the ide
On 12/01/11 14:47, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 12:46 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
I believe postmessage works in gtk2 now.
I did a test and it does not seem o work for me, while
Application.QueueAsyncCall(), that essentially is an enhancement of
same, does work fine
I just tested again
2011/1/12 Kjow :
> Oops, I'm on Windows 7 and yes, sources are present and relative path
> setted on Lazarus.
>
> I upgrade everyday, with a script, fpc + lazarus svn that rebuilds all
> automatically; yesterday there weren't problems... I can't understand
> if it isn't a lazarus/fpc issue
>
> Rega
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 04:48 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Seems like TThread.Synchronize should wake up the GTK main loop.
Hmm. So why does TApplication.QueueAsyncCallwork nicely ?
IMHO it should use the same interface to the underlying Event Que
On 01/12/2011 04:48 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Seems like TThread.Synchronize should wake up the GTK main loop.
Hmm. So why does TApplication.QueueAsyncCallwork nicely ?
IMHO it should use the same interface to the underlying Event Queue
implementation (and thus this code should be
On 12/01/11 15:48, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-12 17:13, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
TThread.Synchronize seems to work fine with fpGUI, but with gtk2 I only
see events when I (e.g.) move the move around on Form.
@Michael van
On 12/01/11 15:41, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-12 14:15, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
I see. So I need to find the docs how to do a "pure" fpGUI project.
Take a look at any of the demos in the 'examples' directory. They are
kept small and simple for a reason.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-12 14:15, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
I see. So I need to find the docs how to do a "pure" fpGUI project.
Take a look at any of the demos in the 'examples' directory. They are
kept small and simple for a rea
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-12 17:13, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
TThread.Synchronize seems to work fine with fpGUI, but with gtk2 I only
see events when I (e.g.) move the move around on Form.
@Michael van Canneyt
Now I don't feel so bad. ;-)
Yes, I though
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-12 14:15, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
I see. So I need to find the docs how to do a "pure" fpGUI project.
Take a look at any of the demos in the 'examples' directory. They are
kept small and simple for a reason. You can also read Michael
article/review rega
On 01/12/2011 04:23 PM, José Mejuto wrote:
Check my comments in: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18191
I did see it. and I feel that it really is time to redesign the thread
communication infrastructure (PostMessage, TThreadSynchronize,
TThread.Queue) in a (more) Widgetset independent wa
Hello Lazarus-List,
Wednesday, January 12, 2011, 4:13:16 PM, you wrote:
MS> More funny stuff:
MS> TThread.Synchronize seems to work fine with fpGUI, but with gtk2 I only
MS> see events when I (e.g.) move the move around on Form.
Check my comments in: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18191
Op 2011-01-12 17:13, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
>
> TThread.Synchronize seems to work fine with fpGUI, but with gtk2 I only
> see events when I (e.g.) move the move around on Form.
@Michael van Canneyt
Now I don't feel so bad. ;-)
[Michael and Luk will understand this email]
Regards,
- G
On 01/12/2011 04:04 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13120
Supposedly this introduces the problem with TThread.Synchronize.
Would it not be possible / more appropriate to implement PostMessage(),
TThread.Synchronize, and TThread.Queue (which is not yet implemen
On 01/12/2011 03:47 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 12:46 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
I believe postmessage works in gtk2 now.
I did a test and it does not seem o work for me, while
Application.QueueAsyncCall(), that essentially is an enhancement of
same, does work fine
More funny s
Hello all
I am trying to implement printing in my app and want to use the
printdialog included with lazarus. I have dropped the print dialog on
the form and set it to appear when a button is clicked.
When the printdialog.execute function is executed an exception is
generated. The exception is
"P
On 12/01/11 14:47, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 12:46 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
I believe postmessage works in gtk2 now.
I did a test and it does not seem o work for me, while
Application.QueueAsyncCall(), that essentially is an enhancement of
same, does work fine
Well, posting an LM
On 01/12/2011 03:47 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 12:46 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
I believe postmessage works in gtk2 now.
I did a test and it does not seem o work for me, while
Application.QueueAsyncCall(), that essentially is an enhancement of
same, does work fine
In fact with
2011/1/12 Mattias Gaertner :
> What OS?
>
> How did you install Lazarus and FPC?
>
> Have you installed the FPC sources?
>
>
>
> Mattias
Oops, I'm on Windows 7 and yes, sources are present and relative path
setted on Lazarus.
I upgrade everyday, with a script, fpc + lazarus svn that rebuilds all
On 01/12/2011 12:46 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
I believe postmessage works in gtk2 now.
I did a test and it does not seem o work for me, while
Application.QueueAsyncCall(), that essentially is an enhancement of
same, does work fine
-Michael
--
___
Kjow hat am 12. Januar 2011 um 14:50 geschrieben:
> Lazarus: r28973M
> FPC 2.4.2: r16754
>
> Double clicking on any component (Form, Button, etc) to create the
> relative event or pressing ctrl+space on the source editor, causes
> this error:
>
> -
Lazarus: r28973M
FPC 2.4.2: r16754
Double clicking on any component (Form, Button, etc) to create the
relative event or pressing ctrl+space on the source editor, causes
this error:
-
C:\Develop\lazarus\lcl\lclclasses.pp(32,10) Error: unit not found: Cla
On 01/12/2011 01:54 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
After all, fpGUI already
has a Object Pascal based event queue and allows PostMessage and
SendMessage, and fpGUI widgets understand the object pascal construct of
'somemethodmessage;'
That is the main reason why I am that interested in fpGUI. I
Op 2011-01-12 14:57, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
> Access to "Homeip" - of course - is disabled by out firewall (i.e.
> proxy) as it can be abused to work for home from the office :)
Don't you just hate proxies! :) I'll send you the article in private.
. you have mail!
Regards,
- Graeme
On 01/12/2011 01:54 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
kept small and simple for a reason. You can also read Michael
article/review regarding fpGUI at the following URL:
http://opensoft.homeip.net:8080/articles/
Access to "Homeip" - of course - is disabled by out firewall (i.e.
proxy) as it can b
Op 2011-01-12 14:15, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
> I see. So I need to find the docs how to do a "pure" fpGUI project.
Take a look at any of the demos in the 'examples' directory. They are
kept small and simple for a reason. You can also read Michael
article/review regarding fpGUI at the followin
Op 2011-01-12 13:18, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
> TThread.synchronize (that is said to drop events when system load is high),
I don't know the LCL internals, but I would expect that to be a FPC
issue and not a GUI toolkit issue.
> SendMessage -> Procedure ..Message (AFAIK, not working in the c
Op 2011-01-12 12:59, Andreas Schneider het geskryf:
> all. Everything that wants to get outside has to go through a HTTP
> proxy. That automatically gets rid of most custom protocols like git.
Ah yes, I forgot about the proxy access. That will indeed block all
other protocols. In our company a
On 01/12/2011 12:46 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
What you are using now is the fpgui lcl interface. This is why the
lazarus form designer works. This interface is not complete, so less
things will work than using the fpgui designer.
I see. So I need to find the docs how to do a "pure" fpGUI pro
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> But they speak Pascal, otherwise why are they trying to register?
What if they want to learn Pascal?
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepas
On 12/01/11 11:18, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/12/2011 11:36 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
Now lets see what I can do with this.
Works like charm !
Just changing the Project's Widget Type from gtk2 to fpGUI toggles the
Widget set and both create working application with just a slightly
differe
Hello Lazarus-List,
Wednesday, January 12, 2011, 12:18:41 PM, you wrote:
MS> Thus the Lazarus Form designer does work for fpGUI including visually
MS> creating TTimer instances.
It works for LCLfpGUI, not for fpGUI ;)
MS> GREAT !
MS> So what do I need the external dedicated / additional fpGUI d
Howard Page-Clark wrote:
What does a(2, 3) return?
Mark I think you can do better than that!
Assuming you meant to write
function d(c, b: integer): integer; etc.
it is still a nonsense, a function that tries to alter non-var
parameters and has an undefined result.
It's OK to give newcome
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:41:50 -0600
Andrew Brunner wrote:
> Debugging under Linux (Ubuntu) is the largest development pain, and
> has persisted since I started cross platform development with
> FPC/Lazarus. I was wondering what if anything could be done to get a
> bug report together and submit s
On 01/12/2011 11:36 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
Now lets see what I can do with this.
Works like charm !
Just changing the Project's Widget Type from gtk2 to fpGUI toggles the
Widget set and both create working application with just a slightly
different look.
Thus the Lazarus Form designer
Joost van der Sluis hat am 12. Januar 2011 um 11:49 geschrieben:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently 'make install' does only install the man-files of the binaries
> which are placed in the search-path. (lazarus-ide, rpmbuild and
> startlazarus)
>
> Do we want to install the other man-files by default t
2011/1/12 Joost van der Sluis :
> Hi all,
>
> Currently 'make install' does only install the man-files of the binaries
> which are placed in the search-path. (lazarus-ide, rpmbuild and
> startlazarus)
>
> Do we want to install the other man-files by default too? (lazres,
> lrstolfm,updatepofiles,sv
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
wrote:
> Duplicate identifiers are used in the same unit in very rare cases only, so
> that normally a qualification is not necessary at all.
Rare cases because I can't use the identifiers TEdit, TButton, etc.
Then we always will have to inven
On 11.01.2011, 15:23 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Op 2011-01-11 15:09, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
>>
>> The git protocol is forbidden by the firewall, the server does not seem
>> to support http:
> That is strange. Most firewalls track the initial outgoing packets of
> traffic, and allow return
Hi all,
Currently 'make install' does only install the man-files of the binaries
which are placed in the search-path. (lazarus-ide, rpmbuild and
startlazarus)
Do we want to install the other man-files by default too? (lazres,
lrstolfm,updatepofiles,svn2revisioninc)
Joost.
--
__
Try using version 0.9.29 (Actual SVN 0.9.31). It already contains components
to MySQL 5.0 and 5.1.
Fabio Souza
-Mensagem original-
De: ziad dudin [mailto:z...@dudin.org]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2011 15:25
Para: Lazarus mailing list
Assunto: Re: [Lazarus] RES: mysql con
On 01/11/2011 03:23 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
That is strange. Most firewalls track the initial outgoing packets of
traffic, and allow return packets back in without problems. Maybe not
all firewalls are made equal. :-/
And no, SourceForge has very limited support for Git - rather annoying.
On 01/11/2011 03:18 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Because this thread is called 'Can't find unit contnrs used by
Masks', I will answer to this:
The IDE now warns if fpc has no config file and can not find any ppu
files.
I did replace the seemingly corrupted fpc.cfg in /etc by some old one I
foun
On 12/1/11 9:27, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
How about a Capcha that was a coding problem?
Some users do not speak english very well, so they may not understand
the problem that we are trying to expres
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
How about a Capcha that was a coding problem?
Some users do not speak english very well, so they may not understand
the problem that we are trying to express.
But they speak Pascal, otherwise why a
Hello Lazarus-List,
Wednesday, January 12, 2011, 2:00:34 AM, you wrote:
>> IMHO the "solution" is to personalize the captcha. The most simple
>> captcha is hard to be resolved by a computer if the captcha "style"
>> change everyday.
HPD> IMO it depends on the financial interest, when e.g. compani
Am 11.01.2011 22:42, schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Marcos Douglas schrieb:
So if rxlib would take the namespace "rx" (on top of units), and someone
else did also take that namespace, then you have the same problem
You right... but, of course at Namespaces will be much longer than "rx"!
Th
86 matches
Mail list logo
