On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-25 22:45, Michael Van Canneyt het geskryf:
This is indeed the problem. However, under Firebird, it is correct. An
Execute will return only the first values.
Is this true even for stored procs that return a result set (aka temp
table
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Jürgen Hestermann
wrote:
>> Better a soft doctor than no doctor.
>
> Here I strongly disagree.
-1 on the disagree
lazbuild is a very important tool. Plus for the user it's internal
structure is completely irrelevant.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
_
On 25 January 2011 06:45, Frank Church wrote:
>
> I am finding the NoGUI option useful in converting projects using
> TDataModules to Linux, but there is some talk about phasing it out.
>
> Can anyone clarify the original purpose behind its existence and whether it
> is problem free so long as no
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Frank Church wrote:
On 25 January 2011 06:45, Frank Church wrote:
I am finding the NoGUI option useful in converting projects using
TDataModules to Linux, but there is some talk about phasing it out.
Can anyone clarify the original purpose behind its existence and whe
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> lazbuild is a very important tool. Plus for the user it's internal
> structure is completely irrelevant.
That is a very good point, because for beginners and new people (Free)
Pascal and Lazarus are very attractive, because th
Op 2011-01-26 11:37, Thorstein Beyer het geskryf:
> ...because of potentially young talents who might join us in the future.
:-) Well... if they are "talented", then hopefully they knew from the
start how to separate non-GUI code from GUI code in the first place, and
not rely on some Lazarus spe
On 26 January 2011 10:19, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Op 2011-01-26 11:37, Thorstein Beyer het geskryf:
>
> > ...because of potentially young talents who might join us in the future.
>
> :-) Well... if they are "talented", then hopefully they knew from the
> start how to separate non-GUI code fro
Hello,
I'm trying to debug a strange crash in an application (it's strange
because the exception dialog appears and then disappears almost
instantly without clicking on any button, so the customer cannot tell me
the reason of the exception).
My application (as almost any application I write)
On Wednesday 26 of January 2011 11:22:47 Luca Olivetti wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to debug a strange crash in an application (it's strange
> because the exception dialog appears and then disappears almost
> instantly without clicking on any button, so the customer cannot tell me
> the reason of t
En/na zeljko ha escrit:
On Wednesday 26 of January 2011 11:22:47 Luca Olivetti wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to debug a strange crash in an application (it's strange
because the exception dialog appears and then disappears almost
instantly without clicking on any button, so the customer cannot tell m
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
Why do you think you need 2 processes and interprocess communication ?
A friend wants to do graphics (diagrams), using BGI, and wants to see
the results while debugging. Some time ago I wrote for him an TCP/IP
server in Delphi, that presents the diagrams.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:50 PM, José Mejuto wrote:
> Hello Lazarus-List,
>
> Sunday, January 23, 2011, 12:06:12 PM, you wrote:
>
> MVC> Attached is a possible patch. I don't have MS-SQL (doesn't
> MVC> run on Linux) so I can't test.
> MVC> Please apply it to packages/fcl-db/src/sqldb/sqldb.pp and
Only 3 issues left. Good work, guys!
2010/12/24 Vincent Snijders
> See
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view_all_set.php?type=3&source_query_id=1811
> for current open issues for the next release.
>
> Vincent
>
>
--
Atenciosamente,
Alexsander da Rosa
Linux User #113925
--
__
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> :-) Well... if they are "talented", then hopefully they knew from the
> start how to separate non-GUI code from GUI code in the first place
I strongly disagree with that, because many people might be seen as talented
at some point in t
On 01/26/2011 11:22 AM, Luca Olivetti wrote:
My application (as almost any application I write) is based on the
assumption that methods invoked by a timer and methods invoked by a
thread with synchronize will never fire at once (i.e. they will be
serialized by the main loop).
Can I be 100%
On 01/25/2011 10:33 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I also can't understand the point of the
'nogui' widgetset.
In fact its "Widget Type". (Not that I like this name, but somebody did
name it so.)
An application is or GUI or non-GUI (latter
requiring no widgetset at all).
Yep, but as the Timers
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:58:58 +0100
Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 01/26/2011 11:22 AM, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> >
> > My application (as almost any application I write) is based on the
> > assumption that methods invoked by a timer and methods invoked by a
> > thread with synchronize will never fire
On 01/26/2011 11:19 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
:-) Well... if they are "talented", then hopefully they knew from the
start how to separate non-GUI code from GUI code in the first place, and
not rely on some Lazarus specific features to help them out with a
temporary fix.
But is "RAD" not real
On 01/26/2011 10:28 AM, Frank Church wrote:
My main concern now is how the GUI part of an app can expose an
interface to data modules that do not require the data module to link
with GUI libraries.
You should do the "Business Logic" as number of Classes. They provide
properties and functio
On 01/26/2011 01:08 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
If the main thread calls Synchronize then the method will be called
instantly.
Yep, But of course this does not result in any preemption, either.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.laz
Op 2011-01-26 14:11, Michael Schnell het geskryf:
> But is "RAD" not really encouraging to drop the separation ?
Indeed, that is my opinion also, and seems to be the case in 99% of the
projects I have worked on in the past. But as Michael van Canneyt
pointed out, RAD doesn't exclude good design [b
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-25 11:46, Mark Morgan Lloyd het geskryf:
In particular, I wonder whether any of the older Ubuntu LTS
releases are still in significant use but don't have them.
I'm running Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS at home on my laptop. I'll take a look
tonight to see if it includes
Michael Schnell hat am 26. Januar 2011 um 13:06
geschrieben:
> On 01/25/2011 10:33 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> >
> > I also can't understand the point of the
> > 'nogui' widgetset.
> In fact its "Widget Type". (Not that I like this name, but somebody did
> name it so.)
It depends on the
On 01/26/2011 02:46 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
It depends on the context.
Obviously.
But as "Widget Set" (as in "external Widget Ste Library") and
"Interface" (this even is a Keyword in fpc) have at least one meaning
that can produce confusion, both expressions are not a good idea to be
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
> In fact (as you might know), for testing, I already did this some time ago,
> but I don't want to offer this code to the Lazarus project, as I took large
> chunks of source code from MSEGUI (which provides exactly this
> functionality), and
In fact I did ask Martin and he did agree that I am allowed to offer his
code to Lazarus, but I really consider it bad design and difficult to
maintain to have multiple completely unsynced implementations of the
same functionality in the same source code tree.(We did discuss this
already some y
Michael Schnell hat am 26. Januar 2011 um 15:40
geschrieben:
>[...]
> both expressions are not a good idea>[...]
> I don't want to offer this code to the Lazarus project
Thanks.
Mattias--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepasca
On 01/26/2011 03:59 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Thanks.
=-O
If anybody really wants to check this code, I'll try to dig it out of
the archive and send it in a private mail.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.or
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
> In fact I did ask Martin and he did agree that I am allowed to offer his
> code to Lazarus, but I really consider it bad design and difficult to
> maintain to have multiple completely unsynced implementations of the same
> functionality in
On 01/26/2011 04:23 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Not sharing is what might be
prohibited, depending on what use you make of this software.
Regarding GPL you need to provide the source code to everybody you give
the executable code. As this was just a "proof of concept" test with
ra
On 26 January 2011 15:23, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Michael Schnell
> wrote:
> > In fact I did ask Martin and he did agree that I am allowed to offer his
> > code to Lazarus, but I really consider it bad design and d
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:58 Thorstein Beyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>>Well... if they are "talented", then hopefully they knew from the
>> start how to separate non-GUI code from GUI code in the first place
> I strongly disagree with that,
Hi Marcos,
On 1/26/2011 3:48 AM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Pew (piffle.the.cat)
wrote:
I followed the instructions here:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Installing_Lazarus#Compiling.2Finstalling_FPC_and_Lazarus_from_Sources_of_SVN_.28Win32.29
As I said, I ch
On 25 January 2011 06:45, Frank Church wrote:
>
> I am finding the NoGUI option useful in converting projects using
> TDataModules to Linux, but there is some talk about phasing it out.
>
> Can anyone clarify the original purpose behind its existence and whether it
> is problem free so long as no
2011/1/26 Peter Eric Williams :
> I now have Free Pascal 2.4.2 compiler installed on Windows from the
> installation file.
>
> I am using Windows 7 Ultimate and there is no autoexec.bat and no My
> Computer icon.
You doesn't need this.
Just use the tutorial before again.
http://wiki.lazarus.freep
On 1/26/2011 13:08, Frank Church wrote:
After having sparked a much longer thread than I expected, I need to get back to
my problem, although it may belong in a different thread.
Now in most case data modules expose interfaces that the GUI parts of the app
call to get data.
My problem now is th
On 26 January 2011 18:29, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 1/26/2011 13:08, Frank Church wrote:
>
>> After having sparked a much longer thread than I expected, I need to get
>> back to
>> my problem, although it may belong in a different thread.
>>
>> Now in most case data modules expose interfaces that t
Am 26.01.2011 18:53, schrieb Peter Eric Williams:
* Win98: Edit autoexec.bat and add the line:
PATH=%PATH%;C:\pp\bin\bin\win32
* WinXP/2k: My Computer (Right Click) -> Properties -> Advanced
(Page) -> Environment Variables -> System Variables -> Edit
"PATH", Add "C:\pp\
On 1/26/2011 13:43, Frank Church wrote:
On 26 January 2011 18:29, waldo kitty mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net>> wrote:
On 1/26/2011 13:08, Frank Church wrote:
After having sparked a much longer thread than I expected, I need to get
back to my problem, although it may belong
Hi guys
I have obtained the TDbf tutorial by Micha Nelissen (english version) and in
the 6.35 Restructure Table it is mentioned the property Restruture, but I
havent found.
I will appreciate any suggestion.
thanks in advance,
Ing. Héctor F. Fiandor Rosario
hfian...@infomed.sld.cu
--
Este
40 matches
Mail list logo
