Hi all,
I just joined this list today as a result of an email conversation I had
with the lead developer of LazSVNPkg, the Lazarus SVN plugin for
revision control the SVN way. He suggested that I raise the issue on the
list if I wanted to help on this. So that is the reason I joined the
list and
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 08:44:28 Dawson wrote:
Ah ... another question I have is kind of a noob question, since I'm new
on this list. Since I couldn't see any easy way of searching through the
entire archive for this topic, I laboriously scanned each and every
archive on the list for by
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 08:44:28 Dawson wrote:
Ah ... another question I have is kind of a noob question, since I'm new
on this list. Since I couldn't see any easy way of searching through the
entire archive for this topic, I laboriously scanned each and every
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 08:44:28 Dawson wrote:
Ah ... another question I have is kind of a noob question, since I'm new
on this list. Since I couldn't see any easy way of searching through the
entire archive for this topic, I laboriously scanned each and every
On 11-4-2012 8:44, Dawson wrote:
Hi all,
I just joined this list today as a result of an email conversation I had
with the lead developer of LazSVNPkg, the Lazarus SVN plugin for
revision control the SVN way. He suggested that I raise the issue on the
list if I wanted to help on this. So
On 10-4-2012 22:26, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Precompiling a second LCL platform:
Do not use make lcl LCL_PLATFORM=qt, as this will update
lclbase.compiled and this tells the IDE to rebuild the
existing ppu of the first platform.
Use instead:
make -C lcl/interfaces/qt
Here is an example
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:40:58 +0200
Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10-4-2012 22:26, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Precompiling a second LCL platform:
Do not use make lcl LCL_PLATFORM=qt, as this will update
lclbase.compiled and this tells the IDE to rebuild the
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I updated and cleaned up the Makefiles of the Lazarus sources.
make help
prints all available targets. There are some more - internal ones -
which are not meant for direct use.
Thanks Mattias, good work and an exemplary summary.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT.
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 09:33:06 Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 11-4-2012 8:44, Dawson wrote:
See here for a message on an extended SVN class that might serve as a
basis for porting functionality:
http://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org/msg28007.html
I might well be
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:47:54 +0200
Benito van der Zander ben...@benibela.de wrote:
Hi,
whenever I compile a project, it first compiles/checks the dependencies:
Compiling package FCL 1.0.1 completed
Compiling package LazUtils 1.0 completed
Compiling package LCLBase 1.0.1 completed
On 10 April 2012 22:25, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I updated and cleaned up the Makefiles of the Lazarus sources.
Good work. This should help many people. I hope you created a Lazarus
Makefile wiki page with this same information.
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
I think I am being a little dumb here
What command would I need to issue, to stay up-to-date with trunk, building
a new IDE (I guess?) and making sure all of my components are up-to-date.
Would it be: make clean all lazarus-ide?
Sorry if the question has already been answered, and that I have
On 11 April 2012 10:20, Martin Schreiber wrote:
A FPC based git frontend is here:
https://gitorious.org/mseuniverse/mseuniverse/trees/master/tools/msegit
I might be wrong, but I think the original poster was referring to a
Source Code Management API for Lazarus IDE, making it possible for
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:34:51 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 April 2012 22:25, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I updated and cleaned up the Makefiles of the Lazarus sources.
Good work. This should help many people. I hope you created a Lazarus
Makefile wiki page
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:39:08 +0100
Richard Mace richard.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I am being a little dumb here
What command would I need to issue, to stay up-to-date with trunk, building
a new IDE (I guess?) and making sure all of my components are up-to-date.
Would it be: make clean
On 11-4-2012 12:45, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 11 April 2012 10:20, Martin Schreiber wrote:
A FPC based git frontend is here:
https://gitorious.org/mseuniverse/mseuniverse/trees/master/tools/msegit
I might be wrong, but I think the original poster was referring to a
Source Code
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:45:46 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 April 2012 10:20, Martin Schreiber wrote:
A FPC based git frontend is here:
https://gitorious.org/mseuniverse/mseuniverse/trees/master/tools/msegit
I might be wrong, but I think the original
What Lazarus version do you use?
r36661
What reason is given for the recompile?
Target: FCL 1.0.1
Build needed.
File: /opt/lazarus/packager/registration/fcl.lpk
Note: FPC unit /home/benito/hg/components/pascal/data/pseudoxpath.pas
is newer than state file of FCL:
unit age=04/11/12
Thanks Martin for your posts on where to look for archives, that was
helpful. I wanted to do my best to check things out before I asked
questions that have already been covered.
In rebuilding Lazarus with LazSVNPkg, I do get the added functionality
to the IDE and the forms pop up when they
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:39:08 +0100
Richard Mace richard.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I am being a little dumb here
What command would I need to issue, to stay up-to-date with trunk,
building
a new IDE (I guess?) and making sure all of my components are up-to-date.
Would it be:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:34:33 +0200
Benito van der Zander ben...@benibela.de wrote:
What Lazarus version do you use?
r36661
What reason is given for the recompile?
Target: FCL 1.0.1
Build needed.
File: /opt/lazarus/packager/registration/fcl.lpk
Note: FPC unit
On 11 April 2012 14:55, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
./lazbuild.exe --build-ide=
primary config path: C:\Users\Richard\AppData\Local\lazarus
After running make clean lazbuild useride I get the following error:
[...]
ERROR: Package file not found
The package FCL
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:13:16 +0100
Richard Mace richard.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 April 2012 14:55, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
./lazbuild.exe --build-ide=
primary config path: C:\Users\Richard\AppData\Local\lazarus
After running make clean lazbuild useride
On 11 April 2012 15:45, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
Mattias,
I installed 9.30.RC3 in a c:\lazarus directory
Then, did a svn checkout in a new c:\lazarus-trunk directory
Then, copied the fpc bin directory from c:\lazarus to c:\lazarus-trunk
and
put it in the
On 4/11/2012 07:00, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
A safe way is
make clean
svn up
make clean lazbuild useride
is the second clean necessary?
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Reinier wrote ...
What are your plans? (Note: haven't used the Lazarus SVN plugin yet)
Well, at this point, I'm trying to get an idea of what has been done in
Lazarus. I wanted to answer the question of how to do revisioning on my
projects (one of which is in collaboration with another
Hi Martin, et al,
I looked at your FPC based git frontend, I must say I'm impressed.
Thanks for sharing that bit with me.
Hi Graeme,
You are right, I am thinking about a source code management API for
Lazarus, and your suggestion about checking out previous work is exactly
what I plan to do, or
Hi again Reinier,
yes, I know what Darius (et al.) have done in lazsvnpkg is a plugin, and
I really think it will be helpful. In a message from Darius, I got the
impression that his work is open source, and it certainly would be a
great building block.
Is there a reason not to make an API, as
Some time ago Bernd improved LazSVN package and removed memory leaks. I
added generics containers and removed some more memory leaks. I think they
are all removed now.
See this mail thread where LazSVN package is an out-of-topic issue:
Dear Mattias, et al.
Thanks for your helpful comments, and for your offer of help about the
IDE interface, that is a very kind offer. I'll keep trying to learn what
I need to learn, and plug myself into whatever I can do to help with
this project.
I'm green here on this list, I just signed up
On 11.04.2012 20:54, Dawson wrote:
Is there a reason not to make an API, as opposed to a plugin for
Lazarus? I guess in some ways the plugin system is nice since it doesn't
force anything on anyone, but on the other hand it seems odd to me that
a developer wouldn't want access to a source code
1. Put your units into a package instead of into fpc.cfg. Then the IDE
knows the dependencies between the units and does not need to ask the
compiler.
Way to much trouble, in case I need to use them in some trivial
test project or compile it without Lazarus
2. Open the package fcl.lpk and set
Dawson schrieb:
Hi again Reinier,
yes, I know what Darius (et al.) have done in lazsvnpkg is a plugin, and
I really think it will be helpful. In a message from Darius, I got the
impression that his work is open source, and it certainly would be a
great building block.
Is there a reason not to
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Dawson schrieb:
Hi again Reinier,
yes, I know what Darius (et al.) have done in lazsvnpkg is a plugin, and
I really think it will be helpful. In a message from Darius, I got the
impression that his work is
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 12:45:46 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 11 April 2012 10:20, Martin Schreiber wrote:
A FPC based git frontend is here:
https://gitorious.org/mseuniverse/mseuniverse/trees/master/tools/msegit
I might be wrong, but I think the original poster was referring to a
On 11-4-2012 20:54, Dawson wrote:
yes, I know what Darius (et al.) have done in lazsvnpkg is a plugin, and
I really think it will be helpful. In a message from Darius, I got the
impression that his work is open source, and it certainly would be a
great building block.
Looking at
36 matches
Mail list logo
