Hi all,
($LazarusDir)/images does not contain any license info about the image
files that are there.
($LazarusDir)/COPYING.txt does not mention the license situation.
What are the licenses for the images in that directory?
Raised as
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23780
Thanks,
Reinier
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:42:32 +0100
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:10:53 +0100
> Reimar Grabowski wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:53:25 +0100
> > Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> >
> > > A quick look at the gtkglext-1.2.0 sources didn't reveal anything
> > > special about multis
On 2/27/13, John Landmesser wrote:
> Per default property Keyoptions is empty and nothing happens pressing
> insert, delete ...
> You can only select the value and edit it.
Same in Lazarus
> If property keyoptions is [keyEdit,keyAdd,keyDelete,keyUnique] and you
> press Control plus keyDelete
Delphi 2010 Pro:
Per default property Keyoptions is empty and nothing happens pressing
insert, delete ...
You can only select the value and edit it.
Am 26.02.2013 19:03, schrieb Bart:
Hi all,
I'm currently working on the ValueListEditor.
I have some questions on the behaviour of the KeyOpt
Am 27.02.2013 13:22 schrieb "ListMember" :
> Referring to your other post, you gave this example:
>
>
> === example begin ===
>
> type
> SomeType1 = record;
> SomeType2 = record;
>
> SomeType1 = record
> // ...
> property SomeProperty: SomeType2 read ... write ...
> end;
>
> SomeT
On 27-2-2013 14:54, leledumbo wrote:
> No such a framework yet, but we have unit testing frameworks on which you can
> do TDD on top of. FPCUnit is distributed along, while FPTest is 3rd party.
Yep. And if you want to automatically store your fpcunit test results in
a database for easy comparison
tiOPF and Greyhound (+ my ghORM) are two frameworks I've ever used. There are
others, but I never touch them.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-CRM-and-MVC-tp4029487p4029508.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at N
No such a framework yet, but we have unit testing frameworks on which you can
do TDD on top of. FPCUnit is distributed along, while FPTest is 3rd party.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-TDD-tp4029488p4029507.html
Sent from the Free Pascal
thaks vincent !
Ing. Pablo Digonzelli
Sofware Solutions
IP Soluciones SRL
25 de Mayo 521. Entrepiso A
email: pdigonze...@softsargentina.com
email: pdigonze...@gmail.com
twitter: @pdigonzelli
Tel: 0381 4227378
Cel: 0381 155982714
- Mensaje original -
De: "Vincent Snijders"
Para
Thanks a lot . I will see it
Ing. Pablo Digonzelli
Sofware Solutions
IP Soluciones SRL
25 de Mayo 521. Entrepiso A
email: pdigonze...@softsargentina.com
email: pdigonze...@gmail.com
twitter: @pdigonzelli
Tel: 0381 4227378
Cel: 0381 155982714
- Mensaje original -
De: "Graeme Gel
On 2013-02-27 13:28, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 27.02.2013 10:51, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/26/2013 04:18 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
You CAN NOT have the record used as a field inside itself,
Using a pointer to this type within a record does make a lot of sense
for creating linked lists. I do this
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Pablo R. Digonzelli
wrote:
> Hi all, i am interested on Lazarus. I want to know if there are ORMs for it?
> Which is the better in your opinion.
> Other question is if there are MVC or MVP frameworks for Lazarus.
> Any answer will be apreciated ..
>
> Sorry for m
Am 27.02.2013 10:51, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/26/2013 04:18 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
You CAN NOT have the record used as a field inside itself,
Using a pointer to this type within a record does make a lot of sense
for creating linked lists. I do this all the time in "C".
This is not what i
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:45:07 +0100
Michael Ring wrote:
> The fonts of lazarus look very ugly on my Macbook Retina, a few weeks
> ago I found the tool retinizer
>
> http://retinizer.mikelpr.com/
>
> and used it on lazarus, the results were amazing, very nice&crisp fonts!
Nice.
How does it achi
On 02/26/2013 05:27 PM, ListMember wrote:
User code needs to create and destroy classes.
With records, there's no need for any of that.
This is because right now a class instance needs to reside on the heap.
But this does not mean it does not make sense to define an additional
class flavor
On 02/26/2013 04:18 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
You CAN NOT have the record used as a field inside itself,
Using a pointer to this type within a record does make a lot of sense
for creating linked lists. I do this all the time in "C".
-Michael
--
___
La
On 02/26/2013 03:07 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
The critical difference between records and classes besides the
ability of records to reside on the stack is that they don't allow
inheritance and they support variable parts. The "don't allow
inheritance" is important, because otherwise you'll have a
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:29:45 -0600
Andrew Brunner wrote:
> This process is called my a linux service.
>
> Required Packages only list as LCLBase and LazUtils. When I remove
> LCLBase the project compiles.
>
> However, if I follow the wiki suggestions I compile just fine but the
> program ter
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, xrfang wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to do the following:
=== example ===
program test;
type
TMyClass = class
type
TDataFilter = function
public
Value : Double;
Filter: TDataFilter;
procedure ViewData;
end;
procedure TMyClass.ViewData;
begin
if Fi
Hi,
Is it possible to do the following:
=== example ===
program test;
type
TMyClass = class
type
TDataFilter = function
public
Value : Double;
Filter: TDataFilter;
procedure ViewData;
end;
procedure TMyClass.ViewData;
begin
if Filter = nil then
WriteLn(Value)
e
On 27.02.2013 08:40, xrfang wrote:
Hi All,
My class looks like this:
TMyClass = class
FField1: Integer;
private
FField2: string;
public
FField3: string;
end;
Question is, is FField1 private or public or protected? For all lcl
classes,
I see a lot of fields above "private", it looks l
21 matches
Mail list logo
