On 13-7-2013 11:27, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:37:16 +0200
> Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> buildlazdialog.pas(58,18) Error: Duplicate identifier "CODETOOLMANAGER"
>> buildlazdialog.pas(58,18) Error: Duplicate identifier "CodeToolManager"
> Please try now.
>
Thanks, Mattias,
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 00:24:10 +0200, duilio foschi
wrote:
> Now I get the following error:
> http://i44.tinypic.com/who3g5.jpg
>From your image, error:
Compiler "/usr/bin/fpc" does not support target arm-linux
I'm not too sure about that one, but you could check and set the
following from the
right.
The problem was exactly what you guessed.
Now I get the following error:
http://i44.tinypic.com/who3g5.jpg
It is frustrating.
It seems that somebody did a sloppy work with this "ready" virtual box
image... :)
Thank you
Duilio
2013/7/13 Anthony Tekatch :
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:58:21
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:58:21 +0200, duilio foschi
wrote:
> I get an error as shown in
> http://i44.tinypic.com/2ljnssz.jpg
>
> What is wrong ?
The error:
"Exception while creating process: Executable not found: "xterm"
I've seen this if the following is set on operating systems that do not
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:37:16 +0200
Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> As per subject line; for about a day I see this when building x86 Laz
> using fpcup:
>
>[...]
> Compiling mainintf.pas
> Compiling buildlazdialog.pas
> buildlazdialog.pas(58,18) Error: Duplicate identifier "CODETOOLMANAGER"
> buildla
Hi Koenraad,
On 13/07/13 16:51, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Since I'm thinking about writing a POS system myself I downloaded
firepos and I tried to compile it. But I'm having dependency problems,
fpgui related. I have a development system (odroid arm-linux) that has
lazarus 1.1 and fpc 2.7.1 (both s
On 13/07/13 19:06, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Op 13-07-13 18:40, Paul Breneman schreef:
Thank you *very* much Koenraad for mentioning that this project uses
fpGUI. I didn't find any docs at the site but I hope to study the code
more ASAP. It is very interesting to see a fpGUI program set up for u
On 7/13/2013 13:58, duilio foschi wrote:
I'd like to wet my feet in Android programming.
I followed the instructions found here
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Custom_Drawn_Interface/Android
and downloaded the "ready Virtual Box Image with FPC and Lazarus" from
sourceforge.
what OS is included in
Op 13-07-13 18:40, Paul Breneman schreef:
Thank you *very* much Koenraad for mentioning that this project uses
fpGUI. I didn't find any docs at the site but I hope to study the code
more ASAP. It is very interesting to see a fpGUI program set up for use
with a touchscreen! I've started down t
I'd like to wet my feet in Android programming.
I followed the instructions found here
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Custom_Drawn_Interface/Android
and downloaded the "ready Virtual Box Image with FPC and Lazarus" from
sourceforge.
After a while, I could happily run Lazarus on a Mandrive distro.
T
On 07/13/2013 10:51 AM, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Op 12-07-13 20:29, Malcolm Poole schreef:
http://code.google.com/p/firepos/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2FmuPDFlaz
Malcolm,
Reading this thread I went to the link. It seems this is a POS system.
Since I'm thinking about writing a POS system myself
Marco van de Voort wrote:
With a bit of good will, a lot can be done. But don't try to convince people
that don't have a strong motivation (like a desire to be multiplatform). It
is usually a waste of time, and it only forces their defenses up.
Thanks, list passed on. Knowing the person concer
Op 12-07-13 20:29, Malcolm Poole schreef:
http://code.google.com/p/firepos/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2FmuPDFlaz
Malcolm,
Reading this thread I went to the link. It seems this is a POS system.
Since I'm thinking about writing a POS system myself I downloaded
firepos and I tried to compile it
On 7/12/2013 22:26, Éderson Cássio wrote:
Em 12-07-2013 22:31, waldo kitty escreveu:
On 7/12/2013 18:36, Éderson Cássio wrote:
I wrote on this thread because I'd like to help to improve Lazarus code as I
find problems with it.
i understand that but your addition has nothing to do with comment
On 7/13/2013 00:48, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Éderson Cássio wrote:
I wrote on this thread because I'd like to help to improve Lazarus code as I
find problems with it.
Waldo meant:
Use the 'Reply' button of your mailer, when you want to
reply to someon
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
leledumbo wrote:
The whole JEDI sucks, dependencies hell everywhere and IS TIED TO WINDOWS!
Some of the components have been converted though.
Virtual Treeview is available for Lazarus.
Quickreport is not needed because we have LazReport, more ove
Problem: Certain object files cannot be placed in an archive file (a static
library) and referenced with {$linklib myarchive} is a pascal unit. I don't
know why and would like some advice.
I am attempting to link a static library (an archive of object files) built
on Linux using mingw-w64 for Wind
leledumbo wrote:
The whole JEDI sucks, dependencies hell everywhere and IS TIED TO WINDOWS!
Some of the components have been converted though.
Virtual Treeview is available for Lazarus.
Quickreport is not needed because we have LazReport, more over, FastReport
is also Lazarus compatible.
Lazarus
On 13-7-2013 2:38, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Elsewhere, somebody's posted this:
>
> "But we already own Delphi XE2. My understanding is that Lazarus is
> still clunky compared with Delf at basic IDE-and-forms stuff; Lazarus
> doesn't support key familiar libraries that we rely on to slap together
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Elsewhere, somebody's posted this:
"But we already own Delphi XE2. My understanding is that Lazarus is still
clunky compared with Delf at basic IDE-and-forms stuff; Lazarus doesn't
support key familiar libraries that we rely on to slap together
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:38:39PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Elsewhere, somebody's posted this:
>
> "But we already own Delphi XE2. My understanding is that Lazarus is
> still clunky compared with Delf at basic IDE-and-forms stuff; Lazarus
> doesn't support key familiar libraries that we
The whole JEDI sucks, dependencies hell everywhere and IS TIED TO WINDOWS!
Some of the components have been converted though.
Virtual Treeview is available for Lazarus.
Quickreport is not needed because we have LazReport, more over, FastReport
is also Lazarus compatible.
Lazarus can connect to many
Elsewhere, somebody's posted this:
"But we already own Delphi XE2. My understanding is that Lazarus is
still clunky compared with Delf at basic IDE-and-forms stuff; Lazarus
doesn't support key familiar libraries that we rely on to slap together
the basic elements (Jedi, Virtual Treeview, Quic
As per subject line; for about a day I see this when building x86 Laz
using fpcup:
C:/development/fpcbootstrap/make.exe -C ide idepkg
make.exe[1]: Entering directory `C:/development/lazarus/ide'
../tools/svn2revisioninc.exe .. revision.inc
C:/development/fpcbootstrap/make.exe --assume-new=lazarus.
24 matches
Mail list logo
