Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-14 Thread Vincent Snijders
2011/2/14 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com: Op 2011-02-11 15:27, Andreas Schneider het geskryf: He who wants to be heard (by me) must follow *my* rules :-] Yeah, but it's not your list and you aren't the only one who reads it. Just saying because what you wrote sounds pretty

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-14 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Op 2011-02-14 10:40, Vincent Snijders het geskryf: It is not forbidden to write HTML mails, I agree is it not wise, because less people can read it. OK, could you maybe create a Lazarus mailing list etiquette page like what was done for fpc-pascal as shown below. This could include attachment

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-13 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Op 2011-02-11 15:27, Andreas Schneider het geskryf: He who wants to be heard (by me) must follow *my* rules :-] Yeah, but it's not your list and you aren't the only one who reads it. Just saying because what you wrote sounds pretty egocentric. Where is the list moderator/maintainer

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-13 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Op 2011-02-11 15:46, Andreas Schneider het geskryf: Fair enough, but I guess it should probably be forbidden by mailman (which, afaik, offers filtering). So it's up to the mailinglist owner. These are the rules for most mailing lists

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-11 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Dejan Boras schrieb: Can you please stop sending HTML messages? The selected font size is so small that I cannot read your message. Sending plain text is sufficient and leaves no room for such problems. Thanks DoDi -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-11 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Bo Berglund schrieb: One of the advantages of following this list via the GMane news relay (news.gmane.org group: gmane.comp.ide.lazarus.general) is that the message bodies are plaintext. :-) This doesn't help any contributor, when I simply disregard his unpleasant messages - be for HTML

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-11 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:18:28 +0100, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Bo Berglund schrieb: One of the advantages of following this list via the GMane news relay (news.gmane.org group: gmane.comp.ide.lazarus.general) is that the message bodies are plaintext. :-) This doesn't help any contributor,

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-11 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 02:27:55PM +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: Just saying because what you wrote sounds pretty egocentric. P.S.: Both of my eMail frontends (The Bat! and Roundcube) had no problems rendering the eMail at a readable size, so I guess: time for you to get a proper

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-11 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:34:19 +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote: I've a problem with it with the latest version of my email-client (ELM), so I would like to see it go too! Fair enough, but I guess it should probably be forbidden by mailman (which, afaik, offers filtering). So it's up to the

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-11 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Andreas Schneider schrieb: He who wants to be heard (by me) must follow *my* rules :-] Yeah, but it's not your list and you aren't the only one who reads it. Just saying because what you wrote sounds pretty egocentric. Yes, I'm egocentric when somebody asks for my assistance ;-)

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-11 Thread de_jean_7777
I am sorry for this, uhm, problem. I was using the Yahoo! web interface at the time to write my mail. Now that I am home, I adjusted my mail client to send only text to the Lazarus list, which I hope will solve any problems. I will make sure to send text only when I'm at work. Thanks to

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-11 Thread waldo kitty
On 2/11/2011 06:02, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Dejan Boras schrieb: Can you please stop sending HTML messages? The selected font size is so small that I cannot read your message. Sending plain text is sufficient and leaves no room for such problems. i went back and looked and dejan's posts

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-11 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
waldo kitty schrieb: i went back and looked and dejan's posts are arriving here as multipart posts with a plain/text section... is your reader selecting the HTML portion over the plain/text one?? Many thanks for this hint :-) It was not easy, but I could find a mailnews_prefer_plaintext

[Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-10 Thread Dejan Boras
In r29190 the executables were output to the same directory as the project file if given a target file name in options. Now (r29435) the executable file is output into the unit output directory, regardless if a target file name is set or not. Creating a new project makes no change. Why the

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-10 Thread Thomas Gatliff
Can you send the compiler options you are using? You can copy them by going to Project - Compiler Options - Show Options (Button) 2011/2/10 Dejan Boras de_jean_7...@yahoo.com In r29190 the executables were output to the same directory as the project file if given a target file name in

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-10 Thread Dejan Boras
From: Thomas Gatliff tgatl...@gatliff.com To: Dejan Boras de_jean_7...@yahoo.com; Lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org Cc: Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 12:01 AM Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change? Can you send the compiler options you are using

Re: [Lazarus] Did the executable output path change?

2011-02-10 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:55:08 -0800 (PST) Dejan Boras de_jean_7...@yahoo.com wrote: In r29190 the executables were output to the same directory as the project file if given a target file name in options. Now (r29435) the executable file is output into the unit output directory, regardless if