On 2015-06-25 12:29, Tony Whyman wrote:
> Run->Clean up and Build
>
> Often works for me with this sort of problem.
Thank you for the suggestion, but no that didn't help. I already did a
similar thing with 'git clean -f -d' which removes everything that isn't
committed.
Regards,
- Graeme -
-
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:26:39 +0100
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>[...]
> > and that the second
> > package unit paths do not include any directories of the first package.
>
> This is a problem.
>
> 1) All units in tiOPF share a common tiDefines.inc include file that
> controls some behaviour o
/Compilers/FPC/
-FU/data/devel/Wisa/fpcpackages/tiopf/Compilers/FPC/lib/x86_64-freebsd/lcl/
-dLCL
-dLCLgtk2
-dUseCThreads
Does anybody know what could be going wrong here? In help would be very
much appreciated. As a work around I used IDE Macros in my project,
instead of Lazarus Packages, then my pr
Hi Mattias,
Many thanks for your response.
On 2015-06-25 12:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> If you let the compiler choose between source and ppu file it
> often chooses source, because source rulez.
That's what I assumed is happening.
> Make sure your packages have their own separate unit outp
86_64-freebsd/lcl/
> -dLCL
> -dLCLgtk2
> -dUseCThreads
>
>
> Does anybody know what could be going wrong here? In help would be very
> much appreciated.
It's on my todo list to generate warnings, if packages share source
directories.
It is a common problem with "u
On 2015-06-25 11:41, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> This is a odd one, but I'll try and explain as best I can.
One more piece of information my Lazarus versions:
Lazarus version | Compile Result
+--
Linux v1.5 r48595 |
On 2015-06-25 11:41, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> This is a odd one, but I'll try and explain as best I can.
I can also add that I have cleared out all compiled units between tests.
This made no difference on my failing systems.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolk
In help would be very
much appreciated. As a work around I used IDE Macros in my project,
instead of Lazarus Packages, then my project compiles just fine. The
other alternative is to create a new package just for my project that
contains all required tiOPF units in a single package, and no
Yes, you are right. Could you send me link to a patch, please? I'll
add it to debian build process. Thank you!
Petr
2014-05-02 14:45 GMT+02:00 Marco van de Voort :
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:30:06AM +0200, Petr Hlozek wrote:
>> Because I have to work with version that is in Debian. My app is
>
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:30:06AM +0200, Petr Hlozek wrote:
> Because I have to work with version that is in Debian. My app is
> builded on Launchpad and Debian build system. After Lazarus 1.2.2
> appears in Debian, I'll build packages for Ubuntu 14.04 as well.
If you could add patches to your bu
Because I have to work with version that is in Debian. My app is
builded on Launchpad and Debian build system. After Lazarus 1.2.2
appears in Debian, I'll build packages for Ubuntu 14.04 as well.
Petr
2014-05-02 8:31 GMT+02:00 leledumbo :
>> https://launchpad.net/~ok2cqr/+archive/lazarus
>
> Why
> https://launchpad.net/~ok2cqr/+archive/lazarus
Why not Lazarus 1.2.2? 1.2.0 with FPC 2.6.4 has a (showstopper) bug with Qt
and Carbon interface.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Packages-of-Lazarus-1-2-and-FPC-2-6-4-for-Ubuntu-14
Hi,
I've created packages for Ubuntu 14.04.
https://launchpad.net/~ok2cqr/+archive/lazarus
I'll try to keep version the same like in Sid.
Petr
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mail
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 20:10:02 +0300, Chris Crori wrote:
Hi all,
is there a "$ComponentName" directive that i can put in unit output
directory in my packages?
Thanks
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.la
Hi all,
is there a "$ComponentName" directive that i can put in unit output
directory in my packages?
Thanks
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25013
New Linux, New Lazarus, having to reinstall the packages with this bug
is a troubling case.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/lis
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Alejandro Gonzalo wrote:
> Not me, I know NOTHING about Laz internals, I just use Laz to develop apps.
> Someone who does know could probably do this in minutes. And how would one
> go about learning the internals?
>
> It's important to make Laz easie
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Alejandro Gonzalo
wrote:
> And how would one go about learning the internals?
>
> It's important to make Laz easier for beginners, and it's not always obvious
> which palette a component is on as it is in Delphi.
See units InstallPkgSetDlg and ComponentPalette.
The
mponent is on as it is in Delphi.
A. G.
From: Mattias Gaertner
To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Packages
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
Alejandro Gonzalo wrote:
> When y
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
Alejandro Gonzalo wrote:
> When you click on a package in the Installed list (in Install/Uninstall
> Packages) it should show which palette it's in. It does in Delphi.
If you want to implement it and you need help, do not hesitate to ask.
Mattias
--
_
When you click on a package in the Installed list (in Install/Uninstall
Packages) it should show which palette it's in. It does in Delphi.
A. G.--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailma
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:51:38 +0200
Juha Manninen wrote:
> 2011/12/23, Mattias Gaertner :
> > There is already a unit "main" in the IDE itself.
>
> Right, the error message was little misleading.
>
> BTW, where does the list of available packages come originally?
> Now i managed to install the p
2011/12/23, Mattias Gaertner :
> There is already a unit "main" in the IDE itself.
Right, the error message was little misleading.
BTW, where does the list of available packages come originally?
Now i managed to install the package and then I uninstalled it, and it
shows in the available list.
Be
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:27:38 +0200
Juha Manninen wrote:
> I am trying to make a package out of Bart's PO checker application.
> I want to integrate it to Tools menu like LeakView or LazSVN packages are.
> I don't know why it is so difficult.
> This new PoChecker package compiles fine but gives an
I am trying to make a package out of Bart's PO checker application.
I want to integrate it to Tools menu like LeakView or LazSVN packages are.
I don't know why it is so difficult.
This new PoChecker package compiles fine but gives an error when I try
to build Lazarus with it. I have compared every
Am Donnerstag, den 06.10.2011, 08:52 +0200 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:59:03 +0200
> Marc Santhoff wrote:
>
> > Hi to everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to know:
> > Is it possible to have fpc compile a source package that is created only
> > as a lazarus package by using the .lpk
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:59:03 +0200
Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Hi to everyone,
>
> I'd like to know:
> Is it possible to have fpc compile a source package that is created only
> as a lazarus package by using the .lpk-file, or do I have to make a
> second sort of building configuration e.g. for fpmake
Hi to everyone,
I'd like to know:
Is it possible to have fpc compile a source package that is created only
as a lazarus package by using the .lpk-file, or do I have to make a
second sort of building configuration e.g. for fpmake or fpcmake?
Secondly, does the generated .pas file corresponding to
On Sat, 14 May 2011 02:26:51 +1100
Alexander Klenin wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:15, Mattias Gaertner
> wrote:
> > Fill in the package options description, author, license, version.
>
> IMO a version is counter-productive for the packages which are
> distributed with Lazarus,
> since the
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:15, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
> Fill in the package options description, author, license, version.
IMO a version is counter-productive for the packages which are
distributed with Lazarus,
since their revisions are syncronized anyway.
I suggest (for all built-in packages,
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 17:27 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> > So maybe fpmake should be more flexible with the last two areas of the
> > version number? Just a thought.
>
> We thought about that and discarded it, since we need to be able to compare
> version numbers. With free format that
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 17:15 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 3 September 2010 11:12, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> >
> > You'd better do the same as we did with lnet. Add a fpmake file to
> > tiOPF/fpGUI's repositories. If that works ok. (Check if fpmake archive
> > works, and if you can use th
On 3 September 2010 17:27, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> We thought about that and discarded it, since we need to be able to compare
> version numbers. With free format that is not possible.
Alexander has a point. Even if version numbers are not 100% numeric,
they still follow a sequencing order.
>> What version number formats does fpmake support. eg: some projects use
>> a date (v0.7-2010-09-03), others use r
>> (v0.7.r43234) etc..
>>
>> So maybe fpmake should be more flexible with the last two areas of the
>> version number? Just a thought.
>
> We thought about that and discarded it, sin
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 3 September 2010 11:12, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
You'd better do the same as we did with lnet. Add a fpmake file to
tiOPF/fpGUI's repositories. If that works ok. (Check if fpmake archive
works, and if you can use that archive to install the
On 3 September 2010 11:12, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> You'd better do the same as we did with lnet. Add a fpmake file to
> tiOPF/fpGUI's repositories. If that works ok. (Check if fpmake archive
> works, and if you can use that archive to install the package, without
> any other resources) we c
On 3 September 2010 13:13, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> So you suggest changing it to .op ? :)
:-)
> pp = Pascal Program makes perfect sense.
Not really correct as not every .pp or .pas file is a "program", most
are simply pascal units. But at least now I understand why you guys
use .pp in FP
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:13:02 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> pp = Pascal Program makes perfect sense.
Not really. First program implies binary (at least for me) and second there is
usually only one 'program'-file in a pascal application, all other source files
are units (leaving out i
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 3 September 2010 12:09, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Why does FPC still use .pp anyway? That's from FPC pre v1 days (as far
as I remember, from Florian's history lesson).
Nono. .pp is the official Free Pascal source extension.
Oh? I thought
On 3 September 2010 12:09, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> Why does FPC still use .pp anyway? That's from FPC pre v1 days (as far
>> as I remember, from Florian's history lesson).
>
> Nono. .pp is the official Free Pascal source extension.
Oh? I thought .pp was only used when the language Florian
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 3 September 2010 11:12, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
You'd better do the same as we did with lnet. Add a fpmake file to
tiOPF/fpGUI's repositories. If that works ok. (Check if fpmake archive
works, and if you can use that archive to install the
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 11:53 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 3 September 2010 11:12, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> >
> > You'd better do the same as we did with lnet. Add a fpmake file to
> > tiOPF/fpGUI's repositories. If that works ok. (Check if fpmake archive
> > works, and if you can use th
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 11:30 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 3 September 2010 11:08, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> >> ~ $ fppkg install lnet
> >> The FPC Package tool encountered the following error:
> >> [lnet] Package fcl-process is not available
> >>
> >
On 3 September 2010 11:12, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> You'd better do the same as we did with lnet. Add a fpmake file to
> tiOPF/fpGUI's repositories. If that works ok. (Check if fpmake archive
> works, and if you can use that archive to install the package, without
> any other resources) we c
On 3 September 2010 11:08, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>> ~ $ fppkg install lnet
>> The FPC Package tool encountered the following error:
>> [lnet] Package fcl-process is not available
>>
>
> This has nothing to do with 2.4.3, but that you have your
> fpc-insta
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 10:57 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 3 September 2010 10:31, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> > The mechanism is basically functional. What needs to be done is using it:
> > Setting up a server with all packages installed, and testing that.
>
> I don't use 'lnet', but a
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 09:58 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Op 2010-09-02 22:05, Joost van der Sluis het geskryf:
> > >
> > > fppkg update
> > > fppkg install lnet
> > >
> > > Check if everything is ok with 'fppkg list'
>
> I get the following error. I've got latest FPC 2.4.3 in my path under
>
On 3 September 2010 10:31, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> The mechanism is basically functional. What needs to be done is using it:
> Setting up a server with all packages installed, and testing that.
I don't use 'lnet', but as I mentioned I have been wanting to add
packages for ages. fpGUI and as
te
> > fppkg install lnet
> >
> > Check if everything is ok with 'fppkg list'
> >
> > Now the lazarus-lnet-package files are in
> > ~/.fppkg/share/doc/fpc-lnet/lazaruspackage
> >
> > Maybe we can add scanning of those directories in Lazarus so
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 3 September 2010 10:12, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
But you are welcome to contribute.
What is still missing? I'm not referring to Lazarus IDE integration,
but rather using fppkg from the command line - so it works on all
platforms with any I
On 3 September 2010 10:12, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> But you are welcome to contribute.
What is still missing? I'm not referring to Lazarus IDE integration,
but rather using fppkg from the command line - so it works on all
platforms with any IDE / programmer editor of choice.
--
Regards,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2010-09-02 22:05, Joost van der Sluis het geskryf:
fppkg update
fppkg install lnet
Check if everything is ok with 'fppkg list'
I get the following error. I've got latest FPC 2.4.3 in my path under
64-bit Linux.
-
Op 2010-09-02 22:05, Joost van der Sluis het geskryf:
> >
> > fppkg update
> > fppkg install lnet
> >
> > Check if everything is ok with 'fppkg list'
I get the following error. I've got latest FPC 2.4.3 in my path under
64-bit Linux.
~ $ rm -rf ~/.fppkg
~ $ fp
f those directories in Lazarus so that
packages installed with fppkg which have lazarus-packages with them
appear in the packages-installation box?
Maybe that way we can make it attractive to use fppkg to install
fpc-additions.
A good idea.
The original idea I had to make fppkg/fpmake more at
nstalled with fppkg which have lazarus-packages with them
appear in the packages-installation box?
Maybe that way we can make it attractive to use fppkg to install
fpc-additions.
Joost
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http:
Hi,
Can somebody add JCF (Jedi Code Formatter) as a category in Mantis
(Lazarus > Packages). I was told by Paul to submit JCF patches in the
Packages section of Mantis, but no JCF category exists. Or should I
place in under the "patch" category?
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGU
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:24:39 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Mattias Gärtner wrote:
> >
> > Well, I could add a short cut for 'showing the todo list for the
> > package/project of the current file in the source editor' or
> > something like that. I need a good/short name for this function?.
>
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Well, I could add a short cut for 'showing the todo list for the
package/project of the current file in the source editor' or something
like that. I need a good/short name for this function?. Any ideas?
That would be great. I am terrible at function names, but lets se
Zitat von Graeme Geldenhuys :
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Yes. But this is a little bit awkward.
Not to bad, because I always have the Project Inspect window open,
so it's just a quick double click to open the Package.
The little bit awkward part is that I love keyboard shortcuts, and
you c
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Yes. But this is a little bit awkward.
Not to bad, because I always have the Project Inspect window open, so it's just
a quick double click to open the Package.
The little bit awkward part is that I love keyboard shortcuts, and you can't assign a
keyboard shortcut to
Zitat von Graeme Geldenhuys :
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I first thought maybe there is a "Package > Todo list" option, but
unfortunately there isn't. Any thoughts on how I can make this work?
No I idea why I did not find this before! If you open the package
and click on the "More..." bu
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I first thought maybe there is a "Package > Todo list" option, but
unfortunately there isn't. Any thoughts on how I can make this work?
No I idea why I did not find this before! If you open the package and
click on the "More..." button which presents a dropdown men
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Only a front end is missing. The scanner itself can already show the
todos of a package. In main.pp function TMainIDE.DoShowToDoList it
That's what I like to hear. :-) Thanks Mattias, I'll take a look at
extending the ToDo list form.
Maybe you want to add a combo
Zitat von Graeme Geldenhuys :
Hi,
I use the Lazarus todo list feature (View > Todo List) often. I also
use Lazarus Packages a lot to group my code. But if I am working on
a application, and in my case that application uses the fpGUI
toolkit package (which I also develop). The stand
Hi,
I use the Lazarus todo list feature (View > Todo List) often. I also use
Lazarus Packages a lot to group my code. But if I am working on a
application, and in my case that application uses the fpGUI toolkit
package (which I also develop). The standard "View > Todo List&quo
65 matches
Mail list logo
