Am 02.08.2013 13:32, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 08/02/2013 01:15 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Application.ExeName is a rather abstract functionality (in the end it
just works with ParamStr(0) anyway...).
Grrr. I meant it might be property that calls an abstract function to
force siblings to implement
On 08/02/2013 01:15 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Application.ExeName is a rather abstract functionality (in the end it
just works with ParamStr(0) anyway...).
Grrr. I meant it might be property that calls an abstract function to
force siblings to implement it. (TCustom... classes are often done like
Am 02.08.2013 12:07, schrieb Michael Schnell:
Will that automatically provide the correct string as
MyApplication.ExeName ?
Yes.
Great. I thought TCustomApplication would be rather abstract.
Application.ExeName is a rather abstract functionality (in the end it
just works with ParamStr(0) an
On 08/02/2013 11:57 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
So you suggest deriving and instantiating a propriety application
from the TCustomApplication class ?
I don't suggest anything. I just react on incorrect information.
I see. Thanks for the clarification .
Will that automatically provide the
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 08/02/2013 11:07 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Widget types do not even enter the picture, customapplication is included
in FPC, not Lazarus.
I see. Thanks.
So you suggest deriving and instantiating a propriety application from the
TCustomA
On 08/02/2013 11:07 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Widget types do not even enter the picture, customapplication is
included in FPC, not Lazarus.
I see. Thanks.
So you suggest deriving and instantiating a propriety application from
the TCustomApplication class ?
Will that automatically pr
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:58:02AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 10:32 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
> >>On 08/01/2013 08:56 PM, Richard Mace wrote:
> >>"Application" is only available when using appropriate
> >>"WidgetTypes". Not when
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 08/02/2013 10:32 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 08/01/2013 08:56 PM, Richard Mace wrote:
"Application" is only available when using appropriate "WidgetTypes". Not
when doing simple command line tools
On 08/02/2013 10:32 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 08/01/2013 08:56 PM, Richard Mace wrote:
"Application" is only available when using appropriate "WidgetTypes".
Not when doing simple command line tools.
It is if you use TCustomApplication from cus
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 08/01/2013 08:56 PM, Richard Mace wrote:
How can I get the path of where my application is running from?
I have tried Application.Name
Application.ExeName
but "Application" is not found?
"Application" is only available when using appropri
On 08/01/2013 08:56 PM, Richard Mace wrote:
How can I get the path of where my application is running from?
I have tried Application.Name
Application.ExeName
but "Application" is not found?
"Application" is only available when using appropriate "WidgetTypes".
Not when doing simple command l
On 1 August 2013 20:09, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 20:56, Richard Mace wrote:
> > Hi,
> > How can I get the path of where my application is running from?
> > I have tried Application.Name but "Application" is not found?
> >
> e.g. paramstr(0)
>
> Note: getting the exe path is not gu
On 01/08/2013 20:56, Richard Mace wrote:
> Hi,
> How can I get the path of where my application is running from?
> I have tried Application.Name but "Application" is not found?
>
e.g. paramstr(0)
Note: getting the exe path is not guaranteed to work on all platforms
(e.g. OSX). Please see the docu
Hi,
How can I get the path of where my application is running from?
I have tried Application.Name but "Application" is not found?
Thanks
Richard
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman
14 matches
Mail list logo